If you need this document translated into Spanish or another language, or need a paper copy, please contact the MTPO Transportation Planning Coordinator, by phone at (423) 434-6272 or email atÃÂ jcmpo@jcmpo.org.ÃÂ
Spanish Translation of the above statement:
Si usted necesita esteÃÂ documentÃÂ resumido enÃÂ espanolÃÂ contacta por favor alÃÂ CoordinatorÃÂ del MTPO , numero deÃÂ telefonoÃÂ (423) 434-6272, correoÃÂ electronicoÃÂ jcmpo@jcmpo.org.
The Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization ensures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 49 CFR, part 26; related statutes and regulations to the end that no person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.
Table of Contents
Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification
1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Introduction
2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Program Development
3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Public Participation
4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Financial Plan
5ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ TIP Amendment and Modification Procedures
6ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Status of Projects in FYs 2020-2023 TIP
7ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Projects to Carryover from FYs 2020-2023 TIP to FYs 2023-2026 TIP
8ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Illustrative Projects
9ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Performance Measures and Targets
10àààààààààIndividual Project Sheets for the FYs 2023 ÃĒâŽâ 2026 TIP
Section B: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program ÃĒâŽâààState Projects (STBG-S)
Section C: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Section D: National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
Section E: Transit Projects (FTA)
Section F:ÃÂ ÃÂ Transportation Alternatives
Section G: Financial Summary Tables
Financial Summary of Highway Funds
Financial Summary of STBG-L Funds (Local Allocation to MPO)
Financial Summary of Transit Funds
Appendix A:ÃÂ ÃÂ Public Participation Documentation
Appendix B: Memorandum of Agreement
Appendix C:ÃÂ ÃÂ Statewide Grouping Descriptions
Appendix D: Highway Funding Program Descriptions
ÃÂ
Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process Certification
In accordance with 23 CFR 450.336, the Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization and the Tennessee Department of Transportation hereby certify that the metropolitan transportation planning process is addressing major issues facing the Johnson City, TN urbanized area, and is being carried out in accordance with the following requirements:
- ÃÂ 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135, 49 U.S.C. 5303 and this subpart;
- In nonattainment and maintenance areas, sections 174 and 176(c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7504, 7506(c) and (d)) and 40 CFR part 93;ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
III.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000 d-1) and 49 CFR part 21;
- ÃÂ 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment or business opportunity;
- Section 11101 (e) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (also known as the ÃĒâŽÅBipartisan Infrastructure LawÃĒâŽÂ) (Pub. L 117-58) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business enterprises in USDOT-funded projects;
- ÃÂ 23 CFR part 230, regarding the implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and Federal-aid highway construction contracts;
VII.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101ÃÂ et seq) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and 38;
VIII.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The Older Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
- Section 324 of Title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on gender; and
- Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27 regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities.
Signature: ________________________________ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Date: ________________________
Randy Trivette
Chair, Johnson City MTPO Executive Board
ÃÂ
__________________________________________ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Date: _________________________
Ronnie PorterÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
Director, TDOT Program Development &
Administration DivisionÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
ÃÂ
Adoption Resolution
A RESOLUTION OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE JOHNSON CITY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MTPO)
To Approve and Adopt the Fiscal Years 2023 ÃĒâŽâ 2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ WHEREAS, the Johnson City MTPO is responsible for carrying out a comprehensive, cooperative, and continuing transportation planning process throughout portions of Carter, Sullivan, Unicoi and Washington Counties; and
ààààààààààààààWHEREAS, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Public Law 117-58, also known as the ÃĒâŽÅBipartisan Infrastructure LawÃĒâŽÂ) requires that each MPO adopt a four-year work program that consists of a program of transportation projects to be advanced during the program period; and
ààààààààààààààWHEREAS, the TIP is comprised of projects that are derived from the MTPOÃĒ⎙s adopted Metropolitan Transportation Plan, which serves as a guide for the development of the TIP; and
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ WHEREAS,ÃÂ the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board determines the use of various Federal Highway Administration funds, including Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, National Highway Performance Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program, Federal Transit Administration programs, and other federal transportation funds that are made available for Johnson City MTPO area projects, as listed in the TIP; and
ÃÂ
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ WHEREAS, no Johnson City MTPO area highway or transit projects are eligible for Federal funds until they are programmed into the TIP; and
ÃÂ
ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ WHEREAS,ÃÂ the Johnson City MTPO has involved the public and interested stakeholders as detailed by the Public Participation Plan, which includes a public review and comment period of no less than fourteen (14) calendar days; and
ÃÂ
ààààààààààààààNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,àthat the Executive Board of the Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization hereby approves and adopts the Johnson City MTPO Fiscal Years 2023 ÃĒâŽâ 2026 TIP.
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
MTPO Executive Board, ChairÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Date
ÃÂ
MTPO Executive SecretaryÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Date
List of Abbreviations
ACÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Advanced Construction
ADAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Americans with Disabilities Act
ACQÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Acquisition of vehicles or equipment
ACNHPPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Advance Construction National Highway Performance Program
BFPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Bridge Formula Program
BILÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
BIPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Bridge Investment Program
CAPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Capital Expenditure
CFRÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Code of Federal Regulations
CMAQÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program
CONSTÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Construction
CRPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Carbon Reduction Program
CRRSAAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act
E+CÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Existing plus CommittedÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
ERÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Emergency Relief Program
IIJAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act
FHWAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal Highway Administration
FLAPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal Lands Access Program
FLTPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal Lands Transportation Program
FTAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal Transit Administration
FFYÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal Fiscal Year
HIPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Highway Infrastructure Program
HSIPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Highway Safety Improvement Program
IAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Improving Manufacturing Public Roads and Opportunities for a Vibrant Economy (IMPROVE) Act
ITSÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Intelligent Transportation System
JCTÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Johnson City Transit System
MAINTÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Maintenance
MAP-21ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21stÃÂ Century Act
MOAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Memorandum of Agreement
MPAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Metropolitan Planning Area
MPOÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Metropolitan Transportation Plan
MTPOÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization
NEPAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Environment Policy Act
NET TransÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Northeast Tennessee Regional Public Transit
NEVIÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program
NHFPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Highway Freight Program
NHPPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Highway Performance Program
NHSÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Highway System
OPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Operating Expenditure
PE-NÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Preliminary Engineering (NEPA)
PE-DÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Preliminary Engineering (Design)
PHSIPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Penalty Highway Safety Improvement Program
PMÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Performance Measures
POPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Program of Projects
PPPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Public Participation Plan
RCPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Reconnecting Communities Program
ROWÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Right of Way
RTPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Recreational Trails Program
SHSPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SRÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ State Route
SS4AÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Safe Streets and Roads for All Grants
STBG-LààààààààààààààààSurface Transportation Block Grant Program ÃĒâŽâ Local Allocation to MPO
STBG-SààààààààààààààààSurface Transportation Block Grant Program ÃĒâŽâ State
STIPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ State Transportation Improvement Program
TAPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Transportation Alternatives Program
TERMÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Transit Economic Requirements Model
TDOTÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Tennessee Department of Transportation
TIPÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Transportation Improvement Program
TRÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Training
U.S.C.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ United States Code
UZAÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Urbanized Area (redefined as urban area)
YOEÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Year of Expenditure
1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Introduction
1.1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ About the Johnson City MTPO
The Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization (MTPO) was established in 1982 when the 1980 Census identified the Johnson City Urbanized Area (urban areas with a population of at least 50,000).ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal law requires the Johnson City MTPO to conduct transportation planning activities within the Johnson City Urbanized Area in aÃÂ continuous, cooperative, and comprehensive process, as defined in the following federal legislation and regulations:
- Current Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act ÃĒâŽâ Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL);
- Previous Surface Transportation Reauthorization Act ÃĒâŽâ Fixing AmericaÃĒ⎙s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act;
- Metropolitan Transportation Planning ÃĒâŽâ Title 23 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 134;
- Formula Grant Program for Metropolitan Planning ÃĒâŽâ Title 49 of the U.S.C., Section 5303;
- Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming ÃĒâŽâ Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450; and
- Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming ÃĒâŽâTitle 49 of the CFR, Section 613, Subpart A.
1.2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Metropolitan Planning Area
Under current federal law, at a minimum, any urbanized area (UZA) with a population over 50,000 must be in a Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) for a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPA is a boundary around the urbanized area that identifies additional areas that are expected to become urbanized within the next twenty (20) years.ÃÂ ÃÂ Please note, in 2022, the Census Bureau defined areas as either rural or urban in new criteria and did away with the term urbanized area, even though the federal transportation law still refers to it. The Johnson City MTPO MPA consists of the Town of Bluff City, the City of Elizabethton, the City of Johnson City, the Town of Jonesborough, a portion of the Town of Unicoi, and parts of Carter, Sullivan and Washington Counties.ÃÂ ÃÂ The map inÃÂ Figure 1ÃÂ on the next page shows the Johnson City MTPO Urbanized Area, as well as the MPA boundaries.ÃÂ ÃÂ The current boundary was adopted by the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board at its meeting on October 9, 2014 and approved by the Governor of the State of Tennessee on December 17, 2014.
Figure 1
1.3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Organizational StructureÃÂ
The Johnson City MTPO is comprised of an Executive Board, an Executive Staff (technical committee) and administrative staff.ÃÂ ÃÂ The Executive Board is the overall governing body for the Johnson City MTPO and is supported by the Executive Staff and the Johnson City MTPO administrative staff.ÃÂ ÃÂ The administrative staff of the Johnson City MTPO is housed by the City of Johnson City.ÃÂ ÃÂ As required by federal law, the Johnson City MTPO is responsible for coordinating transportation planning activities for all its member jurisdictions.ÃÂ ÃÂ Figure 2ÃÂ on page 11 shows the Organizational Structure of the Johnson City MTPO.
Figure 2
Johnson City MTPO Organizational Chart
1.4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Purpose of the Document
As part of the metropolitan planning requirements, the Johnson City MTPO develops and regularly updates a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).ÃÂ ÃÂ The purpose of the TIP is to identify and program all transportation projects within the Johnson City MPA that are funded by federal programs in Titles 23 (Highways) and 49 (Transportation) of the U.S.C.ÃÂ ÃÂ The TIP is cooperatively developed at least every four (4) years by the Johnson City MTPO administrative staff in conjunction with its member jurisdictions, Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and providers of public transportation.ÃÂ ÃÂ The TIP is included by reference in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and adopted by the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board and the Governor of the State of Tennessee.ÃÂ ÃÂ The TIP contains all federally funded andÃÂ regionally significantÃÂ locally fundedÃÂ projects, of which no regionally significant locally funded projects are currently planned. The TIP includes proposed federally funded capital and non-capital surface transportation projects or project phases.ÃÂ
Once a draft TIP is completed, it is submitted to TDOT, FHWA, and FTA for comments. Once the comments have been adequately addressed, the TIP follows the process in the Public Participation Plan (as described on page 16) to provide public notice and an opportunity for the public to comment.ÃÂ ÃÂ Once any public comments are addressed, the TIP is recommended for adoption by the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board.ÃÂ ÃÂ Then, the final TIP is forwarded to TDOT to be included by reference in the STIP and approved by FHWA and FTA.
2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Program Development
The projects that can be included in the TIP range from new construction and capital improvements for highway, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, intercity transportation, to operational and safety improvements.ààConsideration is also given to operational strategies from the Johnson City MTPO Regional Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Architecture and Deployment Plan, the Johnson City Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plans, TDOTÃĒ⎙s Three Year Work Program and 25-Year Long-Range Transportation Policy Plan, the Johnson City Unified Planning Work Program, and the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) for Tennessee.àààÃÂ
2.1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Planning Horizon
All projects in the TIP are derived from the Johnson City MTPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which is a plan that is required to cover at least a twenty (20) year timeframe of planning for projects in the future.ÃÂ ÃÂ TIP projects include either the MTP (Long Range Plan #) Project Number or state the project is consistent with the overall objectives with the MTP.ÃÂ ÃÂ The 2045 MTP was adopted on February 22, 2018.ÃÂ ÃÂ A new 2050 MTP is currently in the draft process and will be adopted on or before February 22, 2023.ÃÂ ÃÂ At a minimum, the TIP is required to cover at least a four (4) year horizon.ÃÂ ÃÂ This TIP covers the federal fiscal years (FFYs) period of October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2026.ÃÂ ÃÂ The previous TIP covered the FFYs period of October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2023 and was adopted on December 20, 2019.ÃÂ ÃÂ The next TIP will cover the FFYs period of October 1, 2025 to September 30, 2029, and the development cycle will begin in early 2025.
2.2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Project Selection
The Johnson City MTPO considered many factors important to the area during its project selection process, which are the same as the previous TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ Those factors are shown inÃÂ Table 1ÃÂ on the next page.ÃÂ ÃÂ Projects that are submitted by local jurisdictions are scored according to the factors for inclusion in the TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ More detail on the project selection process is provided in Section 9.4 on page 44.ÃÂ ÃÂ A call for projects was issued on October 27, 2021. The MTPO staff held a TIP workshop on November 16, 2021. Several new highway and ITS projects were submitted by mid-March 2022. Staff consulted with local jurisdictions and TDOT to determine the status of projects in the current TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ Staff also reviewed available funding and the capacity of the local governments to provide the required match to the federal funds for projects. The final TIP, after state and federal review, will then be formally presented to the Executive Board, which has the responsibility as the governing policy board to adopt the TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ Projects in the first year of the TIP constitute an agreed to list of projects for inclusion in the TIP.
2.3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Project Phases
The TIP is just one part of a projectÃĒ⎙s journey through the planning and approval process.ààProjects in the TIP must first appear in the MTP or consistent with the MTP.ààOne project can have many phases ÃĒâŽâ preliminary engineering, environmental process, design, right-of-way purchase, and finally, construction.ààIt can take many years for one project to complete all phases and be ready for construction, so not all phases may be included in this TIP.ààIn order to add a project phase to the TIP, funding must be identified and be reasonably expected to be available in order to ensure the TIP remains fiscally constrained.ààTable 2àon page 14 lists the types of project phases found in the TIP and a brief description, along with a Glossary in Appendix D that provides in-depth descriptions.
ÃÂ
Table 1
|
TIP Project Selection Criteria |
||
|
Regional Goal |
Criteria |
Points |
|
Safety and Security |
Projects located on facilities with known safety issues for all users |
30 points |
|
Traffic Congestion Mitigation |
Projects located on routes with existing capacity issues |
20 points |
|
Sustainable Growth and Livability |
Projects that minimize future maintenance needs and do not impact natural or cultural resources, or disadvantage residents |
40 points |
|
Regional Access |
Projects that provide access to projected population and employment growth in the region |
10 points |
|
Maximum of 100 points |
||
ÃÂ
2.4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Advanced Construction
Advanced Construction (AC) is a technique which allows a State to initiate a project using non-federal funds while preserving eligibility for future Federal-Aid funds. Eligibility means that FHWA has determined that the project technically qualifies for Federal-Aid; however, no present or future federal funds are committed to the project. After an AC project is authorized, the state may convert the project to regular Federal-Aid funding provided Federal funds are made available for the project.
An AC project must meet the same requirements and be processed in the same manner as a regular Federal-Aid project. All phases of a project must meet federal requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act), etc., when any phase is implemented with Federal-Aid funds.
ÃÂ
Table 2
|
Types of Project Phases |
||
|
Project Phase |
Acronym |
Description |
|
Acquisition/Purchase |
ACQ |
Procuring equipment, software, or vehicles |
|
Capital |
CAP |
Capital Expenditures, including capitalized preventive maintenance on revenue vehicles |
|
Construction |
CONST |
Work by the agency or contractor(s) to construct the project, possibly including utility relocation |
|
Maintenance |
MAINT |
Activities to maintain the transportation/transit system |
|
Operations |
OP |
Operating the transportation system such as incurring costs related to the day-to-day operations or maintenance of transit vehicle systems, traffic signal systems, or intelligent transportation systems |
|
Preliminary Engineering – NEPA |
PE-N |
Includes activities from the inception of the project, fulfilling the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and all applicable legislation, regulations, executive orders, and directives, up to the approval of the environmental document |
|
Preliminary Engineering – Design |
PE-D |
Preliminary engineering design work, in which general project location and design concepts are determined |
|
Right-of-Way |
ROW |
Work from the distribution of ROW plans up to advertising for bids or commencement of work by the Agency, dealing with real property acquisition, temporary and permanent easements, and utility relocation |
ÃÂ
2.5ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Goals of the Federal-Aid Highway Program
Title 23 of the U.S.C., Section 150(b) lists a set of seven (7) national transportation goals for the federal-aid highway system:
(1)ààààSafetyàÃĒâŽâ To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.
(2)ààààInfrastructure conditionàÃĒâŽâ To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair.
(3)ààààCongestion reductionàÃĒâŽâ To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System.
(4)ààààSystem reliability ÃĒâŽâàTo improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system.
(5)ààààFreight movement and economic vitalityàÃĒâŽâ To improve the National Highway Freight Network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development.
(6)ààààEnvironmental sustainabilityàÃĒâŽâ To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.
(7)ààààReduced project delivery delaysàÃĒâŽâ To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies’ work practices.
2.6ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Federal Planning Factors
In addition to project selection criteria, the Johnson City MTPO also considered the ten (10) planning factors identified Title 23 of the CFR, Section 450.306 (b), which requires MPOs to focus efforts on regional strategies that:
(1)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
(2)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
(3)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
(4)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight;
(5)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;
(6)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes, for people and freight;
(7)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Promote efficient system management and operation;
(8)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system;
(9)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and
(10)ÃÂ Enhance travel and tourism.
3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Public Participation
The Johnson City MTPO Public Participation Plan (PPP) provides guidelines for how the public and interested stakeholders will be involved in the development of the TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ Throughout the development of the MTP and the TIP, the public and interested stakeholders are given an opportunity to comment.ÃÂ ÃÂ The full document is available on the website atÃÂ https://jcmpo.org/ppp.html.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ
Throughout the development of the MTP, significant public input was gathered from online surveys and public meetings.ÃÂ ÃÂ In addition to this, the MTP was made available for thirty (30) calendar days for the public to comment.ÃÂ ÃÂ All projects in the TIP must either be in the MTP or consistent with the MTP, thus the public has already been made aware of planned projects and has been provided with the opportunity to comment.
To build on this process, the TIP process includes additional opportunities for the public to be involved.ÃÂ ÃÂ Following the process outlined in the PPP, the final draft TIP is available to the public for review and comment for fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the public notice in the regional newspaper, theÃÂ Johnson City Press.ÃÂ ÃÂ The notices and document are made available on the Johnson City MTPO website and posted on social media.ÃÂ ÃÂ All public participation documentation and comments are compiled for inclusion in Appendix A of the TIP document and presented to the Executive Board.ÃÂ ÃÂ If there are significant comments, the Executive Board may choose to postpone the adoption of the TIP until such time these comments can be addressed.ÃÂ ÃÂ If the TIP document changes significantly, the Executive Board may decide to request an additional review period to afford the public the opportunity to comment on the revisions.
3.1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Coordination and Consultation Process
As part of the ÃĒâŽÅConsultation ProcessÃĒâŽÂ required by Section 450.316 of the CFR, the Johnson City MTPO has established contact with federal and state agencies.ààFormal coordination with these agencies will help to identify effective mitigation strategies for potential impacts of projects included in the Johnson City MTPOÃĒ⎙s MTP and TIP.ààThe Johnson City MTPO public participation processes shall be coordinated with the statewide transportation public involvement process through review and communication wherever possible.ààThe Johnson City MTPO Interagency Consultation List is available as Appendix C in the PPP.ààA checklist from the PPP for adoption of the TIP is shown asàTable 3àbelow.
Table 3
|
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Checklist |
|
|
Activity |
Technique(s) |
|
Draft Document |
Available online atÃÂ www.jcmpo.orgÃÂ and at the Johnson City MTPO office. |
|
Comment Opportunities |
|
|
Public Notice & Comment Period |
14 Calendar Days, beginning with public notice in a regional newspaper and on the Johnson City MTPO website atÃÂ www.jcmpo.org, and on social media.ÃÂ http://www.jcmpo.org/ |
|
Public Meeting Notice |
Published a minimum of seven (7) calendar days prior to the public meeting in the Johnson City Press, on the website and on social media. |
|
Amendment Notice |
Amendments to the TIP will follow the same public review process and procedures as that of TIP adoption. |
|
Summary of comments received |
A public comment summary will be made available to members of the Executive Board prior to the meeting for the TIP adoption/amendment.ÃÂ ÃÂ Written and verbal comments are summarized and incorporated into the final document.ÃÂ ÃÂ If significant changes are made after addressing the comments, additional opportunity for public comment will be provided. |
|
Final, adopted document availability |
The final, adopted TIP document will be available on the Johnson City MTPO website and at the administrative office. |
3.2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Title VI / Environmental Justice
As with all processes and projects in the Johnson City MTPO, Title VI, Environmental Justice, and the ADA are a priority.ààTitle VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based upon race, color, or national origin.ààSpecifically, Title 42 of the U.S.C., Section 2000d states, ÃĒâŽÅNo person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.ÃĒâŽÂààEnvironmental Justice, Executive Order 12898 of 1994 states, ÃĒâŽÅEach Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations.ÃĒâŽÂààIn addition to the Executive Order, the US DOT issued Orderà5610.2(a), which provides directive about how Environmental Justice communities are to be addressed in the planning process.ÃÂ
All projects using federal highway trust funds for the Johnson City MTPO comply with Title VI and Environmental Justice.ÃÂ ÃÂ The Johnson City MTPO has procedures for addressing Title VI complaints by making available a complaint form and an instruction document, in both English and Spanish languages, on our website atÃÂ https://jcmpo.org/titlevi.html.ÃÂ ÃÂ Staff has also published a Title VI notice in the Johnson City Press in January 2022, in both English and Spanish languages. The TIP document can also be translated into another language, upon request.
ÃÂ
3.3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ADA and Transition Plans
As part of FHWAÃĒ⎙s regulatory responsibility under Title II of the ADA of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the FHWA ensures that recipients of Federal aid and State and local entities that are responsible for roadways and pedestrian facilities do not discriminate on the basis of disability in any highway transportation program activity, service, or benefit they provide to the general public; and to ensure that people with disabilities have equitable opportunities to use the public rights-of-way system.ÃÂ
Table 4ÃÂ below describes the status of the ADA Transition Plans that are required for cities and counties with 50 or more employees.
Table 4
|
Status of ADA Transition Plans |
||||
|
Jurisdiction with 50 or more employees |
ADA Coordinator Identified |
ADA Grievance Procedures Developed & Published |
Self-Evaluation Completed |
ADA Transition Plan Completed |
|
City of Elizabethton, TN |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
Fall 2022 |
|
City of Johnson City, TN |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
|
Town of Jonesborough, TN |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
|
Carter County, TN |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
|
Sullivan County, TN |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
|
Washington County, TN |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃĒÅâ |
ÃÂ
3.4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Public Transportation Program of Projects
Local public transportation providers rely on their coordination with the Johnson City MTPO public participation process outlined in the PPP to ensure public awareness and outreach of the agenciesÃĒ⎙ Program of Projects (POP).ààJohnson City MTPOÃĒ⎙s public involvement activities, public notices, and public comment periods on the TIP will satisfy the POP requirement of the Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5307) administered by FTA.
Public notices of the TIP will state:àÃĒâŽÅPublic involvement activities and time established for public review and comment on the TIP will satisfy the Program of Projects requirement for the Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area Formula Program.ÃĒâŽÂ
3.5ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
At the end of each federal fiscal year, an annual listing of obligated projects, including investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding year, will be published or otherwise made available by the cooperative effort of the state, transit operator and metropolitan planning organization for public review.ààThe listing will be consistent with the categories identified in the TIP. The listing includes both highway (FHWA) and transit (FTA) projects.ààNotice will be given through the website, under the ÃĒâŽÅProjects & InfoÃĒâŽÂ tab, and on social media.ààThe listing will be distributed and discussed at the Executive Board/Staff meetings, along with the listing emailed to the distribution list.ÃÂ
4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Financial Plan
4.1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Fiscal Constraint
The TIP is required to include a financial plan that demonstrates how the program of projects can be implemented.ÃÂ ÃÂ This includes identifying eligible federal, state, and local funding sources.ÃÂ ÃÂ Member jurisdictions of the Johnson City MTPO, TDOT and other agencies that reside in the Johnson City MTPO MPA boundary have submitted projects and indicated they have the financial resources to provide the necessary local matching funds to complete their projects.ÃÂ ÃÂ If funding revenues change, either in the positive or negative level, the TIP will be adjusted or amended when necessary.
Detailed financial breakdowns are included in the Summary Tables in Section G of this document.àààThe total amount of money available in each funding category is shown, as well as the total amount of programmed expenditures and remaining funds by funding source by year.ààThe tables show that programmed expenditures are within the balance of expected fund allocations in accordance with the requirements of the IIJA (BIL).ààTherefore, the TIP is ÃĒâŽÅfiscally constrained.ÃĒâŽÂ
4.2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Revenue Sources
The annual allocation of Surface Transportation Block Grant Program ÃĒâŽâ Local Allocation to MPO funds (STBG-L) for the Johnson City Urbanized Area is estimated at $1,820,268 for each fiscal year. The Tennessee Department of Transportation provided this estimate to the Johnson City MTPO.ààSTBG funds are federal funds that come from the Highway Trust Fund through fuel taxes and authorized with the transportation reauthorization Act.ààIn recent years, due to shortfalls, the Highway Trust Fund has been supplemented with general budget appropriations.ààThe current act, the IIJA (BIL), expires on September 30, 2026.àààSTBG-L funds are allocated by TDOT to the small MPOs and is the primary funding source for non-transit transportation projects funded by the Johnson City MTPO.ààLocal matching funds for projects are provided by jurisdictions through their own revenue sources, primarily through property and sales taxes.ààIn developing the TIP, the Johnson City MTPO used the annual allocation to program projects, covering multiple years in the TIP, to ensure they do not exceed projections; however, the annual allocation can vary from year to year, depending upon revenue from the highway trust fund, changes to the gas tax, congressional rescissions, new transportation authorization legislation or other external influences.ààIf this occurs, the Johnson City MTPO will adjust the TIP accordingly.
The Johnson City MTPO works closely with public transportation providers in forecasting transit revenue to include in the TIP, taking into consideration historic funding from the GovernorÃĒ⎙s allocation of Section 5307 funds and discretionary grant funding in other programs, such as Section 5310 and 5339.ÃÂ
4.3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Cost Estimation
Each project listed in this TIP has a cost estimate assigned to it.ÃÂ ÃÂ These cost estimates were derived through consultation with local jurisdictions, consultants, the Johnson City MTPO staff, public transportation providers, and TDOT, as was done in developing the MTP.ÃÂ ÃÂ The Johnson City MTPO staff also uses a conceptual planning cost estimation tool provided by TDOT.ÃÂ ÃÂ The Johnson City MTPO used Year of Expenditure (YOE) to calculate future costs.ÃÂ ÃÂ Johnson City MTPO funding requirements are compiled from available data for future expected capital, operating, and maintenance expenditures for highways, transit, and bike/pedestrian transportation modes, as well as from historical expenditures, which have been projected with a 5% inflation rate.ÃÂ ÃÂ This rate was determined in consultation with TDOT Programming Division.ÃÂ ÃÂ The TIP is required to be fiscally constrained.
4.4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Ongoing Maintenance and Operations Cost
The Johnson City MTPO and its member jurisdictions must assure the maintenance and efficient operation of existing transportation infrastructure.ÃÂ ÃÂ Maintenance activities are those that occur primarily in reaction to situations that have an immediate or imminent adverse impact on the safety or availability of transportation facilities, such as pavement resurfacing and markings, street lighting, sidewalk repair, sinkhole repair, bridge repair, guardrail and sign replacement, and traffic signal maintenance.ÃÂ ÃÂ Operations may include more routine items such as painting and right-of-way maintenance.ÃÂ ÃÂ While these annual activities are not funded through or scheduled in the TIP, they are included inÃÂ Table 5ÃÂ on the next page to demonstrate that jurisdictions and agencies have the resources to operate and maintain the new or improved facilities, equipment, and services programmed in the TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ These numbers are based on uncertain economic growth.ÃÂ ÃÂ Actual numbers may change.ÃÂ ÃÂ For future years, a conservative estimate of a one (1) percent increase in the budget was used and is shown in the Financial Summary of Highway Funds on page 81. In the event Federal transportation funds were made available for maintenance and operations projects, it would be identified in the TIP.
Table 5
|
Highway Maintenance and Operations Budgets ÃĒâŽâ FFY 2023 |
||
|
Jurisdiction |
Estimated Annual Revenues |
Estimated Annual Costs |
|
Town of Bluff City, TN |
$291,567 |
$291,567 |
|
City of Elizabethton, TN |
$2,380,660 |
$2,380,660 |
|
City of Johnson City, TN |
$16,360,818 |
$16,360,818 |
|
Town of Jonesborough, TN |
$898,837 |
$898,837 |
|
Town of Unicoi, TN |
$140,967 |
$140,967 |
|
Town of Watauga, TN |
$12,334 |
$12,334 |
|
Carter County, TN* |
$2,038,314 |
$2,038,314 |
|
Sullivan County, TN* |
$246,783 |
$246,783 |
|
Unicoi County, TN* |
$24,671 |
$24,671 |
|
Washington County, TN* |
$18,758,377 |
$18,758,377 |
|
TDOT |
$2,567,758 |
$2,567,758 |
|
Total Annual Budget |
$43,721,086 |
$43,721,086 |
*These figures include county-wide costs; the Washington County Highway Department operates its own asphalt plant for the county.
For public transportation providers, funds are spent on daily operations activities and maintenance of vehicles and equipment, which are principal components in sustaining a safe and efficient public transportation infrastructure.ÃÂ ÃÂ Table 6ÃÂ on the next page provides estimated annual operations and maintenance costs for the public transportation providers.
ÃÂ
Table 6
|
Public Transportation Maintenance and Operations Budgets |
||
|
Revenue Source |
Estimated Annual Revenues |
Estimated Annual Costs |
|
Operating Assistance – FTA 5307 (Federal & Non-Federal Match) |
$4,033,395 |
$4,033,395 |
|
Operating Assistance – Other FTA Programs (FTA 5310, Discretionary, etc.) (Federal & Non-Federal Match) |
$375,000 |
$375,000 |
|
TDOT State Operating Assistance Program (UROP) (State & Local Match) |
$728,700 |
$728,700 |
|
TDOT Critical Trips (CRIT) Program (State & Local Match) |
$88,074 |
$88,074 |
|
Total Annual Budget |
$5,225,169 |
$5,225,169 |
4.5ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Funding Programs
Over the years, new transportation authorizations have eliminated, consolidated, or created transportation funding programs.ÃÂ ÃÂ The newest transportation authorization, the IIJA (BIL), is a five-year authorization enacted on November 15, 2021. The previous bill, the FAST Act, expired September 30, 2020 and was extended several times until December 2021.ÃÂ ÃÂ Table 7ÃÂ on the next page summarizes the major funding categories available for transportation projects in the TIP, including a brief description of the types of eligible activities, along with the funding ratio.ÃÂ ÃÂ Please note that although funding sources discussed inÃÂ Table 7ÃÂ may not be in the current TIP, this information is provided to educate stakeholders on the funding that is available and the changes that occurred when the IIJA (BIL) was signed into law.ÃÂ ÃÂ Many stakeholders may be unaware of these changes and still expect a specific program to be available when it was actually changed, eliminated, or consolidated into another program.ÃÂ ÃÂ Also, the funding ratio may be different for specific safety improvement projects (listed in 23 U.S.C. 120(c)(1)), with up to 100% funded by Federal dollars.ÃÂ ÃÂ The tables are broken out by Federal Highway Administration programs, Federal Transit Administration programs, and discretionary (competitive) grant programs available from each entity.ÃÂ ÃÂ Please note that there are other funding programs available in the IIJA (BIL) for transportation projects and activities; however, these programs were not reasonably expected to fund any of the projects in this TIP.
Table 7
|
Federal Transportation Funding Programs |
|||
|
IIJA (BIL) Federal Programs |
FAST Act Federal Programs |
Description |
Funding Ratio |
|
Federal Highway Administration – Formula Programs |
|||
|
Bridge Formula Program (BFP) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provides formula funds replace, rehabilitate, preserve, protect, and construct highway bridges. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Carbon Reduction Program (CRP) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) ÃÂ |
Did not exist |
Provides formula funds for projects designed to reduce transportation emissions, defined as carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from on-road highway sources. Requires State, in consultation with MPOs, to develop (and update at least every 4 years) a carbon reduction strategy and submit it to DOT for approval. DOT must certify that a StateÃĒ⎙s strategy meets the statutory requirements. à|
80%-100% Federal, 0%-20% Non- Federal ÃÂ |
|
Emergency Relief Program (ER) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act, except wildfires was added to the list of natural disasters. ÃÂ |
Emergency Relief Program (ER) |
Provides funding for emergency repairs and permanent repairs on Federal-aid highways and roads, and roads on Federal Lands. |
80%-100% Federal, 0%-20% Non- Federal ÃÂ |
|
Federal Lands Transportation Programs (FLTP) (FLAP) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act; however, FLAP projects are now 100% federal. ÃÂ ÃÂ |
÷àààFederal Lands Transportation Program (FLTP) ÷àààFederal Lands Access Program (FLAP) |
Provides funding for roads providing access to and within Federal and Indian lands. Eligible applicants include only state, county, tribal, or city government agencies that own or maintain the transportation facility. |
80%-100% Federal, 0%-20% Non- Federal ÃÂ FLAP is 100% Federal |
|
Highway Infrastructure Program (HIP) |
|||
|
Program was updated by the IIJA (BIL) to include new formula and discretionary programs. ÃÂ |
Bridge Formula Program (BFP) |
Provides formula funds to replace, rehabilitate, preserve, protect, and construct highway bridges. ÃÂ |
80%-90% Federal, 0%-10% Non- Federal ÃÂ |
|
CRRSAA was a one-time special appropriation by Congress. |
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSAA) |
Provides funding for activities eligible under section 133(b) of title 23, U.S.C. (Section III.A. of the Highway Infrastructure Programs – Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2021 (HIP-CRRSAA) Implementation Guidance). ÃÂ |
100% Federal |
|
National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program (NEVI) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Strategically deploy electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure and establish an interconnected network to facilitate data collection, access, and reliability. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) |
Provides funding for projects to improve the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) and support several goals. Projects must be included in a national and state strategic plan for improvements to highway freight transportation. ÃÂ |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act, but adds a new goal for resiliency. |
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) |
Provides funding to provide support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS); to provide support for the construction of new facilities on the NHS; to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State’s asset management plan for the NHS; and to provide support for activities to increase the resiliency of the NHS to mitigate the cost of damages from sea level rise, extreme weather events, flooding, wildfires, or other natural disasters. ÃÂ |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) ÃĒâŽâ Formula to States |
|||
|
New program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provides funding for evacuation routes, coastal resilience, making existing infrastructure more resilient, or efforts to move infrastructure to nearby locations not continuously impacted by extreme weather and natural disasters. Higher Federal share if the State develops a resilience improvement plan and incorporates it into its long-range transportation plan. ÃÂ |
Planning Grants 100% Federal; Resiliency Grants 80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal |
|
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG-L) (STBG-S) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act, but with added suballocation categories and eligible activities. |
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) – State |
Provides funding for roads functionally classified as rural major collector and above.ÃÂ ÃÂ Funds may be utilized on projects in Rural Areas, Urban Clusters & Urbanized Areas. Other activities include Transportation Alternatives, Safety, and Rail-Highway Crossings. ÃÂ |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG-L) ÃĒâŽâ Local Allocation to MPO à|
Provides funding to urban areas of 50,000 to 200,000 in population for improvements on routes functionally classified urban collectors or higher. The State is to establish a process to consult with relevant metropolitan planning organizations and describe how funds will be allocated equitably. ÃÂ |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
|
Transportation Alternatives (TAP) ÃÂ |
This program is a set-aside in the STBG for activities such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, historic preservation, environmental mitigation, etc. ÃÂ |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
|
Recreational Trails Program (RTP) |
Provides funding for the creation, rehabilitation and maintenance of multi-use recreational trails.ÃÂ ÃÂ However, governor can opt-out to the set-aside from TA funds for this program. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
|
Federal Transportation Funding Programs |
|||
|
IIJA (BIL) Federal Programs |
FAST Act Federal Programs |
Description |
Funding Ratio |
|
Federal Transit Administration Programs |
|||
|
Urbanized Area Formula Grant (Section 5307) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
FTA-5307 |
Section 5307 is a formula grant program for urbanized areas providing capital, operating, and planning assistance for mass transportation.ÃÂ ÃÂ Other eligible activities include job access and reverse commute projects.ÃÂ ÃÂ Operators must maintain equipment & facilities according to the Transit Asset Management Plan. |
Capital ÃĒâŽâ 80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal OperatingàÃĒâŽâ 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal à|
|
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FACT Act. |
Federal Transit Administration Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals with Disabilities (FTA-5310) ÃÂ |
Section 5310 is a formula grant program for urbanized areas that provides funding for operating and capital expenses of state/local governments, non-profit groups, and operators of public transportation providing service to elderly persons or persons with disabilities. |
Capital ÃĒâŽâ 80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal OperatingàÃĒâŽâ 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal |
|
Formula Grant for Rural Areas (Section 5311) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
Federal Transit Administration Formula Grant for Rural Areas (FTA-5311) |
Section 5311 is a formula grant program provided to states to support public transportation in rural areas of less than 50,000 in population.ÃÂ ÃÂ Funding is available for capital, planning, and operating assistance.ÃÂ |
Capital ÃĒâŽâ 80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal OperatingàÃĒâŽâ 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal à|
|
BusÃÂ and Bus Facilities (Section 5339) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
Federal Transit Administration Bus and Bus Facilities (FTA-5339) |
Section 5339 is a formula grant program that provides funding to replace, rehabilitate, and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities including technological changes or innovations to modify low- or no-emission vehicles or facilities. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Federal Discretionary (Competitive) Grant Programs |
|||
|
IIJA (BIL) Federal Programs |
FAST Act Federal Programs |
Description |
Funding Ratio |
|
Federal Highway Administration Programs |
|||
|
Bridge Investment Program (BIP) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Project to replace, rehabilitate, preserve or protect one or more bridges on the National Bridge Inventory or to replace or rehabilitate culverts to improve flood control and improve habitat connectivity for aquatic species. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Charging and Refueling Infrastructure Program |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provides competitive grant funding to support installation of facilities along the alternative fuel corridor established under federal law, except for projects under the Community grants program where facilities can be located on any public road or in other publicly accessible locations. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Healthy Streets Program |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provides competitive grant funding for the deployment of cool pavements and porous pavements and to expand tree cover and mitigate urban heat islands, to improve air quality, and other climate projects. ÃÂ |
80%-100% Federal, 0%-20% Non- Federal |
|
Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) Grants |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
INFRA Grants |
Establishes the Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects (NSFHP) program, which provides competitive grants or credit assistance to nationally and regionally significant multimodal freight and highway projects that align with the program goals. ÃÂ |
60% INFRA, 20% other Federal, 20-40% non-federal |
|
Local and Regional Project Assistance Program (formerly RAISE/BUILD/TIGER Grant) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist (however, it codifies the RAISE grants from previous appropriations acts) ÃÂ ÃÂ |
Projects with a significant local or regional impact that improve transportation infrastructure. |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
National Infrastructure Project Assistance Program (ÃĒâŽÅMega-projectsÃĒâŽÂ) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provide funding through single-year or multiyear grant agreements for eligible surface transportation projects that cost $100 million or more. ÃÂ |
ÃÂ |
|
Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) ÃĒâŽâ Discretionary Grants |
|||
|
New program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provides funding for evacuation routes, coastal resilience, making existing infrastructure more resilient, or efforts to move infrastructure to nearby locations not continuously impacted by extreme weather and natural disasters. Higher Federal share if the eligible entity develops a resilience improvement plan (or is in a State or area served by MPO that does) and the State or MPO incorporates it into its long-range transportation plan. ÃÂ |
Planning Grants 100% Federal; Resiliency Grants 80% Federal, 20% Non-Federal |
|
Reconnecting Communities Pilot Program (RCP) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Restore community connectivity by removing, retrofitting, or mitigating highways or other transportation facilities that create barriers to community connectivity, including to mobility, access, or economic development. ÃÂ |
50-80% Federal, 20-50% Non-Federal |
|
Safe Streets and Roads for All Grants (SS4A) |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Competitive program to support local initiatives to prevent death and serious injury on roads and streets, commonly referred to as ÃĒâŽËÃĒâŽËVision ZeroÃĒ⎙ÃĒ⎙ or ÃĒâŽËÃĒâŽËToward Zero DeathsÃĒ⎙ÃĒ⎙ initiatives. à|
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Grant Program |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Programmed competition that will deliver competitive grants to states, local governments, and tribes for projects that improve transportation safety and efficiency. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Wildlife Crossings Pilot Program |
|||
|
New Program for the IIJA (BIL) |
Did not exist |
Provides funding for projects that seek to achieve a reduction in the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions; and improve habitat connectivity for terrestrial and aquatic species. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Federal Discretionary (Competitive) Grant Programs |
|||
|
IIJA (BIL) Federal Programs |
FAST Act Federal Programs |
Description |
Funding Ratio |
|
Federal Transit Administration Programs |
|||
|
Bus and Bus Facilities Discretionary Program (Section 5339) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
Bus and Bus Facilities (Section 5339) |
Provides funding to states and transit agencies through a statutory formula to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal ÃÂ 85% Federal for ADA vehicles ÃÂ |
|
Low or No Emissions Bus Discretionary ProgramÃÂ (Section 5339) |
|||
|
Program is largely the same as it was under FAST Act. |
Low or No Emission Bus (Section 5339) |
Provides funding to states and transit agencies through a statutory formula to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities. ÃÂ |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal ÃÂ 85% Federal for ADA vehicles ÃÂ |
TIP Amendment and Modification Procedures
The TIP may be modified at any time through two processes.ÃÂ ÃÂ One is the amendment process and the other is the administrative modification process.ÃÂ ÃÂ A Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Johnson City MTPO and TDOT has been agreed upon which outlines these processes and requirements.ÃÂ ÃÂ Extracts from this MOA are outlined in the sections below.ÃÂ ÃÂ A complete copy of the MOA is provided in Appendix B of this document.
4.6ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Project Thresholds
The MOA between the Johnson City MTPO and TDOT identifies the project cost change thresholds that require either an amendment or an administrative modification.ÃÂ ÃÂ Table 8ÃÂ below shows the project cost change thresholds, a sliding scale of the total programmed funds of all phases of a project that is shown within the approved TIP and how much of a percentage of that change triggers the amendment process or the administrative modification process.ÃÂ ÃÂ This applies to FTA projects as well as FHWA projects.ÃÂ ÃÂ For example, if the total programmed funds are $1 million, and additional funds of $500,000 are being added, the percent cost change is 50 percent, which would require the administrative modification process.ÃÂ ÃÂ If the total project cost is $ 1 million, and additional funds of $800,000 are being added, the percent cost change is 80 percent, which would require the amendment process.
Table 8
|
Project Cost Change Thresholds |
||
|
Total programmed funding within the approved STIP/TIP |
Amendment |
Administrative Modification |
|
Up to $2 million |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ 75% |
< 75% |
|
$2 million to $15 million |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ 50% |
< 50% |
|
$15 million to $75 million |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ 40% |
< 40% |
|
$75 million and above |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ 30% |
< 30% |
4.7ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Amendments
An amendment is a revision to the STIP/TIP that involves major changes to a project or the overall program and must meet the requirements of 23 CFR ç450.216 and ç450.326 regarding public review and comment, re-demonstration of fiscal constraint, and transportation conformity. An amendment requires TDOT and FHWA/FTA approval. An amendment is required when changes to the STIP/TIP include:
- A major change in the total project cost (excluding groupings) (see discussion on project cost change thresholds above); or
- Adding a new project or deleting a project from the STIP/TIP; or
- A major change of project scope; examples include, but are not limited to, changing the number of through-lanes, adding/deleting non-motorized facilities, changing mode (e.g., rolling stock or facility type for transit), changing capital category (i.e., transit funding), or changing termini; or
- Any change requiring a new regional air quality conformity finding (including a grouping); or
- Moving funds between an MPO TIP and STIP unless a written agreement exists between the MPO and TDOT that such an action may be a processed as an administrative modification; or
- Moving funds between an MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP and another MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP unless a written agreement exists between each MPO and TDOT that such an action may be processed as an administrative modification.
4.8ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Administrative Modifications
An administrative modification is a minor change from the approved STIP/TIP. Administrative modifications must be consistent with 23 CFR Part 450, but they do not require public review and comment, or a conformity determination in non-attainment or maintenance areas. STIP/TIP administrative modifications are defined as follows:
- A minor change in the total project cost (see project cost change thresholds);
- AÃÂ minor change in project description that does not change the air quality conformity finding in maintenance and/or non-attainment areas; or
- AÃÂ minor change in project description/termini that is for clarification and does not change the project scope such as a length change for reasonable transition purposes; or
- Shifting funds between projects within the STIP/TIP (i.e., funding sources and projects already identified in the STIP/TIP) if the change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see project cost change thresholds listed above) for the total project cost of all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
- Adding an amount of funds already identified in the STIP/TIP for the current or previous year(s) if:
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The funds are currently identified in the STIP/TIP either in an existing project or as available funds; and
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (project cost change thresholds listed above) for the total project cost of all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
- Moving project phases or funding from year to year within an approved STIP/TIP, except those that cross air quality horizon years; or
- Adding any phase (if total project cost includes all phases), such as environmental or location study, preliminary engineering, right-of-way, or construction to a project in the STIP/TIP so long as such a change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see project cost change thresholds) for the total project cost of all phases shown within the approved/amended STIP/TIP; or
- Changes required to follow FHWA or FTA instructions as to the withdrawal of funds or re-establishment of funds withdrawn at the request of FHWA or FTA; or
- Moving funds between similarly labeled groupings, regardless of percent of change; or
- Adjustments in revenue to match actual revenue receipts; or
- Adding a project with 100% state or non-federal funding for all phases that does not change the air quality conformity finding in maintenance and/or non-attainment areas.
5ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Status of Projects in FYs 2020-2023 TIP
On November 16, 2021, the Johnson City MTPO held a TIP workshop for the Executive Staff toàdisucssàthe status of the MTPOÃĒ⎙s STBG balance and the need for new projects to program into the TIP.ààIt was also announced at the Executive Board meeting on December 8, 2021, that a new TIP would be developed and issued a call for projects.ààAn email was also sent to all members and the public about a call for projects in November 2021. With these notifications, it was found there was a back log of projects that would be required to be carried over into the new TIP.ààStaff met individually with each jurisdiction to review current projects and their status, available funding, and capacity for matching local funds for projects.àààTables 9àandà10àon the next few pages provide a summary of the status update of the projects.ààPlease note that reoccurring groupings, listed below, are on-going projects with no particular status:
- Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Grouping (2090565, STBG-State funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Urban Grouping);
- National Highway Performance Program Grouping (2090560, NHPP funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called National Highway System Preservation and Operation Urban Grouping);
- Highway Safety Improvement Program Grouping (2090595, HSIP/PHSIP funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called Safety ÃĒâŽâ Urban Grouping); and
- Transportation Alternatives Program Grouping (2020-09, TAP funds).
ÃÂ
Table 9
Status of Projects in FYs 2020-2023 TIP
|
TIP No. TDOT PIN |
Project Name (Location) |
Description |
Status |
|
2014-01 125528.00 |
Elk Avenue Bridge Repair (Elizabethton) |
Repair and rehab the bridge due to deterioration |
Complete |
|
2017-01 127849.00 |
SR 67/91/US 321 at SR 37/US 19E Traffic Signal Upgrade (Elizabethton) |
Upgrade and install traffic signal at intersection of SR-37 (US-19E), Intersection at SR-67 (SR-91/US-321/ Broad Street) to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices, advanced traffic controls, etc. |
Under Construction |
|
2017-02 127426.00 |
SR 34 at Industrial Park Rd Traffic Signal Upgrade (Bluff City) |
Upgrade and install traffic signal at intersection of SR-34 (US-11E/19W) and Industrial Park Road to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices, advanced traffic controls, etc. |
Complete |
|
2017-16 130739.00 |
Traffic Signal for SR 34 (US 11E/E Jackson Blvd) & Tiger Way (Jonesborough) |
Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of State Route 34 (US 11E/East Jackson Blvd) and Tiger Way to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices, advanced traffic controls, etc. |
PE underway |
|
2017-21 128783.00 |
ElizabethtonÃÂ ADAÃÂ TransitionÃÂ Plan (Elizabethton) |
The City of Elizabethton will complete an ADA Transition Plan that will improve accessibility to those with disabilities to comply with ADA requirements. |
Fall 2022 |
|
2022-01 N/A |
Downtown Johnson City Crosswalk Safety Project (Johnson City) |
Improve safety by upgrading lighting at downtown Johnson City crosswalks and correcting Americans with Disabilities Act issues, including meeting Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines at crosswalks. |
Awaiting TDOT Contract |
|
2022-02 N/A |
Johnson City Traffic Signal Grouping (Johnson City) |
Installation of traffic signals at various intersections in Johnson City to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices, advanced traffic controls, etc. |
Awaiting TDOT Contract |
|
2010010 043975.01 |
State Route (SR) 91 Extension (Elizabethton) |
Resurface and restripe existing 5-lane, reconstruct 4-lane to 5-lane, add curb and gutter section, add sidewalk section, reconfigure intersection of North Roan St and East Elk Ave |
Under Construction |
|
2090015 124790.00 |
SR-XXX (Knob Creek Rd) (Johnson City) |
Reconstruct 2 lane roadway addressing geometric issues |
PE scheduled for 2023 |
|
2017-14 125177.00 |
Traffic Signal for State of Franklin Rd and Harris Dr (Johnson City) |
Installation of traffic signal at the intersection of SR381 (State of Franklin Rd) and Harris Drive to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices, advanced traffic controls, etc. |
Complete |
|
2090110 112457.00 |
I-26 Exit 24 (Johnson City) |
Grading, drainage, base and paving of an auxiliary lane on eastbound I-26, construct an auxiliary lane on SR-67 northbound, improvements to I-26 westbound off-ramp at SR-67, build retaining walls on I-26 and SR-67, modify the signal at the northbound SR-67 intersection with the westbound I-26 off-ramp, install lighting along eastbound I-26, pavement markings, seeding, traffic control devices, EPSC devices, etc. |
Project Closed Out |
Table 10
Status of FTA Transit Projects
|
TIP No. |
Project Name (Agency) |
Description |
Status |
|
2020-01 |
JCT Transit Operating (Johnson City Transit) |
Daily operating of fixed route and demand response service (including employees’ wages, fuel and oil, insurance, radio communications, operating supplies, and utilities) and capitalized ADA complementary paratransit service. ÃÂ |
On-Going |
|
2020-02 |
JCT Capital ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5307 (Johnson City Transit) |
Capitalized Preventive Maintenance (labor, parts, and periodic routine services) and other capital, including support equipment, associated capital, passenger waiting shelters and bus stop signs) ÃÂ |
On-Going |
|
2020-03 |
JCT Capital ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5307 & 5339 (Johnson City Transit) |
Acquisition of paratransit vehicles, buses, and/or technology |
9 buses delivered; 4 paratransit vehicles acquired, with 3 more ordered; Heavy duty lift replaced in garage; Purchased paratransit routing software ÃÂ |
|
2020-04 |
New Freedom (Johnson City Transit) |
Funds operating assistance, capital purchases and program administration of the New Freedom route service. ÃÂ |
On-Going with redistributed residual funding |
|
2020-05 |
Job Access (Johnson City Transit) |
Funds operating assistance, capital purchases and program administration of the Job Access Program services. ÃÂ |
On-Going with redistributed residual funding |
|
2020-06 |
JCT Capital ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5310 (Johnson City Transit) |
Funds capital purchases and program administration of Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (formerly New Freedom) route service. |
On-Going |
|
2020-07 |
NET Trans Operating Expenses (NET Trans) |
Daily operating of demand response transportation services in the urbanized area outside of the corporate City limits including but not limited to: Bluff City, Elizabethton, Unicoi, Telford, Jonesborough. Service will also provide regional connectivity between UZAs. Daily operating of demand response service (including employees’ wages, fuel, insurance, radio communications, operating supplies and utilities). |
On-Going |
|
2020-08 |
Enhanced Mobility for Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities (Grouping) |
Section 5310 transit formula funding awarded by TDOT to area agencies for capital vehicle purchases from statewide contract |
2 vehicles acquired |
|
2020-10 |
NET Trans Capital Project (NET Trans) |
Section 5339 funds that will be used to purchase vehicles for use within the Johnson City Urbanized Area |
In process of ordering |
6ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Projects to Carryover from FYs 2020-2023 TIP to FYs 2023-2026 TIP
After the status of a project was assessed, the determination was made whether to carryover the project to the new TIP.ààThe Executive Staff (technical committee) considered a projectÃĒ⎙s current status, available funding, and capacity for matching local funds for projects before making the decision to rank the projects and carry them over to the FYs 2023-2026 TIP.ààTable 11àbelow lists the carryover projects.
Table 11
Projects to Carryover
|
TIP No. TDOT PIN |
Project Name (Location) |
Description |
|
2017-16 130739.00 |
Traffic Signal for SR 34 (US 11E/E Jackson Blvd.) & Tiger Way |
Installation of a new traffic signal to improve safety and congestion including such items as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices and advanced traffic controls, etc. |
|
2022-01 ÃÂ |
Downtown Johnson City Crosswalk Safety Grouping |
Improve safety by upgrading lighting at downtown Johnson City crosswalks and correcting American with Disability access issues, including meeting PROWAG. |
|
2022-02 |
Johnson City Traffic Signal Grouping |
Installation of traffic signals at various intersections in Johnson City to improve safety and congestion such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices, CCTV, advanced signal controls, etc. |
|
2090015 124790.00 |
SR-XXX (Knob Creek Rd.) |
Reconstruct 2 lane roadway addressing geometric issues |
7ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Illustrative Projects
Table 12ÃÂ on the next page provides a listing of illustrative projects, some of which are un-funded transportation improvement projects within the Johnson City MPA area.ÃÂ ÃÂ These projects are not financially affordable, given the current assumptions on availability of future transportation funds over the four-year TIP period.ÃÂ ÃÂ As funding becomes available, these projects will need to be amended into the financially constrained portion of the FY 2023-2026 TIP in order to be funded.ÃÂ
The first project is the Knob Creek Road project, from Mizpah Hills Drive to Marketplace Blvd. Johnson City is currently finishing up the PE and ROW phases of this project before they will hand it off to TDOT staff to manage construction. Once that happens and TDOT programs the funding for construction, this project will be amended into the TIP.
The second project is the Jonesborough Parkway project.ÃÂ ÃÂ The MTPO staff submitted a request to TDOT in 2018 for a needs assessment planning study on this proposed new corridor in Jonesborough.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ This project has been included in the last three long-range metropolitan transportation plans.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ As of now, this project has not been advanced for a study.ÃÂ ÃÂ It remains a high priority to address increased traffic congestion for the Jonesborough area on US 11E / State Route 34 and provide better access to I-26 and north Johnson City.
ÃÂ
Table 12
Illustrative Projects
|
Project Name |
From |
To |
Length Miles |
Type of Improvement |
Project Description |
Phase |
Estimated Cost |
|
Knob Creek Rd Extension |
West of Mizpah Hills Dr |
Market Place Blvd |
0.939 |
Reconstruction |
Construct a new 5-lane road with overpass crossing CSX RR |
CONST |
$31,201,810 |
|
Jonesborough Parkway |
SR-354 (Boones Creek Rd) |
SR-34/US 11E at Persimmon Ridge Rd |
2.7 |
New Road |
Construct a new 3-lane roadway |
All Phases |
Estimate Needed |
ÃÂ
8ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Performance Measures and Targets
8.1ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ What is Performance-Based Planning and Programming?
This section of the TIP outlines performance measures (PM) and targets as part of the performance-based approach to planning and programming activities that were first established by MAP-21 in 2012, then continued by the FAST Act, and also continued by the IIJA (BIL).ÃÂ ÃÂ Performance-based planning requirements will ensure that the selection of transportation and transit projects show progress toward meeting national goals established to improve the overall transportation and transit system.ÃÂ ÃÂ The Johnson City MTPO has partnered with TDOT and the two local transit providers, Johnson City Transit System (JCT) and Northeast Tennessee Rural Public Transportation (NET Trans), by signing a Memorandum of Understanding to establish a cooperative process to develop, share and report information related to performance measures and performance targets that will show progress toward national goals, which are explained in more detail in this section.ÃÂ Figure 3ÃÂ below, provided by FHWA in the Performance-Based Planning and Programming Guidebook, is a guide for how the performance-based planning process affects programming of projects into the TIP.ÃÂ
Figure 3
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
8.2ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Transportation National Goals with Performance Measures and Targets
Section 2.5 on page 14 of this TIP document defines the seven (7) national goals that were established to address safety, infrastructure, traffic congestion, efficiency, environment, transportation delays, and project delivery delays.ÃÂ ÃÂ Table 13ÃÂ belowÃÂ andÃÂ 14ÃÂ on the next few pages outlines each national goal, the performance measures that have been established by FHWA to make progress toward meeting those goals, along with their corresponding performance targets, and their status of establishment by TDOT and the Johnson City MTPO.ÃÂ ÃÂ
ÃÂ
Table 13 (PM1)
|
Transportation National Goals, Performance Measures and Targets |
||||
|
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline (2017-2021)[1] |
Performance Target for 2019-2023[2] |
Status for TDOT/MTPO |
|
Safety |
Total number of traffic-related fatalities on all public roads |
1,148.6 |
1,308.2 |
Targets established by TDOT on August 31, 2022 and by Johnson City MTPO on December 13, 2022 |
|
Rate of traffic-related fatalities on all public roads per 100 million VMT[3] |
1.417 |
1.601 |
||
|
Total number of traffic-related serious injuries on all public roads |
5,995.6 |
6,069.4 |
||
|
Rate of traffic-related serious injuries on all public roads per 100 million VMT |
7.416 |
7.424 |
||
|
Total number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads |
546.4 |
600.9 |
||
Table 14 (PM2 and PM3)
|
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2-Year Performance Target |
4-Year Performance Target |
Status for TDOT/MTPO |
|
Infrastructure Condition – Pavement |
Percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Good condition |
75.6% |
N/A |
60.0% |
Targets established by TDOT on October 1, 2022; and by Johnson City MTPO by April 1, 2023 |
|
Percentage of pavements on the Interstate System in Poor condition |
0.14% |
N/A |
1.0% |
||
|
Percentage of the non-interstate National Highway System in Good condition |
44.8% |
42.0% |
40.0% |
||
|
Percentage of the non-interstate National Highway System in Poor condition |
3.24% |
4.0% |
5.0% |
||
|
Infrastructure Condition – Bridge |
Percentage of National Highway System bridges classified as in Good condition |
39.5% |
36.0% |
36.0% |
|
|
Percentage of National Highway System bridges classified as in Poor condition |
4.9% |
6.0% |
6.0% |
||
|
Congestion Reduction |
Annual Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita |
Not applicable to the Johnson City MTPO Area, which is in attainment and is not eligible for CMAQ funding |
MTPO ÃĒâŽâ not applicable |
MTPO ÃĒâŽâ not applicable |
Targets established by TDOT on October 1, 2022; Johnson City MTPO ÃĒâŽâ not applicable |
|
Percentage of Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) Travel |
|||||
|
System Reliability |
Percentage of the Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate that are reliable |
87.7% |
85.3% |
83.0% |
Targets established by TDOT on October 1, 2022; and by Johnson City MTPO by April 1, 2023 |
|
Percentage of the Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate National Highway System that are reliable |
N/A |
N/A |
87.5% |
||
|
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2-Year Performance Target |
4-Year Performance Target |
Status for TDOT/MTPO |
|
Freight Movement & Economic Vitality |
Percentage of Interstate System mileage providing reliable truck travel time |
1.35 |
1.35 |
1.33 |
Targets established by TDOT on October 1, 2022; and by Johnson City MTPO by April 1, 2023 |
|
Environmental Sustainability |
Total emissions reductions by applicable pollutants under the CMAQ program |
Not applicable to the Johnson City MTPO Area, which is in attainment and is not eligible for CMAQ funding |
MTPO ÃĒâŽâ not applicable |
MTPO ÃĒâŽâ not applicable |
Targets established by TDOT on October 1, 2022; Johnson City MTPO ÃĒâŽâ not applicable |
8.3ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Transit National Goals with Performance Measures and Targets
FTA has also established performance measures and targets for the public transportation providers for a strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, and improving public capital assets effectively through their entire life cycle, along with requirements for safety management systems.ÃÂ ÃÂ The regional targets for Transit Asset Management are shown inÃÂ Table 15ÃÂ on the next page.ÃÂ ÃÂ The transit safety targets are shown inÃÂ Table 16ÃÂ on page 44.
ÃÂ
Table 15
|
Transit National Goals, Performance Measures and Targets |
||||
|
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline ÃÂ (June 2022) |
Performance Target ÃÂ (June 2023) |
Status for Public Transportation Providers / MTPO |
|
Transit Asset Management |
Rolling Stock: The percentage of revenue vehicles (by type) that exceed the useful life benchmark (ULB) |
Bus – 0% Cutaway – 15% Minivan – 44% Vans – <25% |
Bus – 0% Cutaway – <15% Minivan – 22% Vans – <25% |
Public transportation providers established targets on April 29, 2022; Johnson City MTPO established targets on June 22, 2022 |
|
Equipment: The percentage of non-revenue service vehicles (by type) that exceed the ULB |
Service Vehicles – 60% |
Service Vehicles – 40% |
||
|
Facilities: The percentage of facilities (by group) that are rated less than 3.0 on the Transit Economic Requirements Model (TERM) Scale |
Maintenance – 0% Passenger – 0% |
Maintenance – 0% Passenger – 0% |
||
|
Infrastructure:ÃÂ ÃÂ The percentage of track segments (by mode) that have performance restrictions |
Not applicable as no providers operate passenger trains |
Not applicable as no providers operate passenger trains |
Not applicable |
|
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
Table 16
|
Transit National Goals, Performance Measures and Targets |
||||
|
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Performance Target |
Status for Public Transportation Providers / MTPO |
|
|
Number |
Rate per 100K VRM* |
|||
|
Improving the transit industryÃĒ⎙s safety performance |
Fatalities:ÃÂ Total number of reportable fatalities and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode |
JCT: 0 ÃÂ NET Trans: 0 |
JCT: 0 ÃÂ NET Trans: 0 |
Public transportation providers established targets on April 29, 2022; Johnson City MTPO established targets on June 22, 2022 |
|
Injuries:ÃÂ Total number of reportable injuries and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode |
JCT:ÃÂ ÃÂ 1 ÃÂ NET Trans: 2 |
JCT:ÃÂ ÃÂ 0.000021 ÃÂ NET Trans: 0.08 |
||
|
Safety Events:ÃÂ Total number of reportable events and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode |
JCT:ÃÂ ÃÂ 2 ÃÂ NET Trans: 3 |
JCT:ÃÂ ÃÂ 0.33 ÃÂ NET Trans: 0.12 |
||
|
System Reliability:ÃÂ Mean distance between major mechanical failures by mode |
JCT: 25 ÃÂ NET Trans: 15 |
Miles between major Mechanical Failures ÃÂ JCT:ÃÂ ÃÂ 24,000 ÃÂ NET Trans: 163,748 |
||
*VRM ÃĒâŽâ Vehicle Revenue Miles
8.4ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Linking Performance Measures and Targets to Project Selection from the MTP to the TIP
Section 2.2 on page 12 of this TIP document describes the process and the criteria that are used to select projects to include in the TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ There are both new projects and projects that are carried over from previous TIPs.ÃÂ ÃÂ Projects were scored and prioritized. The project selection criteria were updated to reflect the criteria in the new MTP.ÃÂ ÃÂ TIP projects can be shown to support performance targets.ÃÂ ÃÂ Table 17 on the next page shows the linkage of project selection criteria to the performance targets.
Table 17
|
Linkage of Performance Measures to Project Selection Criteria |
|
|
Performance Measure |
Project Selection Criteria |
|
Safety |
Safety and Security |
|
Pavement / Bridge Condition |
Sustainable Growth and Livability (Please note: TDOT currently maintains and manages projects on the interstate and NHS routes in the Johnson City MTPO MPA) |
|
Congestion Reduction |
Traffic Congestion Mitigation (Please note: the Johnson City MTPO MPA is an attainment area and is not eligible for CMAQ funding) |
|
System Reliability |
Traffic Congestion Mitigation (Please note: TDOT currently maintains and manages projects on the interstate and NHS routes in the Johnson City MTPO MPA) |
|
Freight Movement & Economic Vitality |
Regional Access (Please note: TDOT currently maintains and manages projects on the interstate and NHS routes in the Johnson City MTPO MPA) |
|
Environmental Sustainability |
Sustainable Growth and Livability (Please note: the Johnson City MTPO MPA is an attainment area and is not eligible for CMAQ funding) |
|
Transit Asset Management |
Traffic Congestion Mitigation Regional Access Sustainable Growth and Livability |
|
Transit Safety |
Safety and Security |
The projects in the TIP were requested in the past by local jurisdictions based on their needs and concern for safety and improved transportation performance.ààThese requests included traffic signals, bridge repair, and congestion relief through widening or alternate routings.ààThe anticipated effect of these projects in the TIP toward achieving the performance targets set by TDOT and supported by the Johnson City MTPO mentioned in this section can be expected to positively contribute to the overall progress of meeting the stateÃĒ⎙s targets, albeit a small impact.ÃÂ
The Johnson City MTPO reviewed all the projects in the TIP for inclusion and compliance with the MTPOÃĒ⎙s adopted MTP, which includes the National Goals for Performance-Based Planning.ààThe Johnson City 2045 MTP was adopted on February 22, 2018, before the Performance Measures became effective on May 27, 2018.ààAs such, the linkage of the TIP to the National Goals for Performance-Based Planning and Programming and the incorporation of the performance measures will occur in the next cycle of the MTP update, which is scheduled to be adopted in February 2023.
Table 18ÃÂ on the next page demonstrates the linkage between the goals and objectives within the MTP to the federal planning factors and national goals in the IIJA (BIL).ÃÂ ÃÂ As you can see, the four MTP goals and corresponding objectives support achievement of each of the seven (7) national goals and each of the ten (10) federal planning factors.ÃÂ
Table 18
|
Linking MTP Goals to National Goals |
|||
|
MTP Goals |
MTP Objectives |
IIJA (BIL) |
|
|
Federal Planning Factors |
National Goals |
||
|
Goal #1: Improve Safety and Security throughout the MTPO AreaÃÂ Transportation System |
Objective: Reduce crash rates for serious injuries and fatalities |
Increase theÃÂ safetyÃÂ of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. ÃÂ Increase theÃÂ securityÃÂ of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. |
SafetyÃÂ – Achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. |
|
Objective: Reduce the number of secondary traffic crashes ÃÂ |
|||
|
Objective: Establish initiatives (projects and programs) to improve the safety and security of vulnerable roadway users (e.g. pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, and the young and old) ÃÂ |
|||
|
Objective: Encourage partnerships with other transportation and non-transportation agencies to enhance transportation safety and security ÃÂ |
|||
|
Objective: Increase the transportation systemÃĒ⎙s resilience to climate change and extreme weather |
|||
|
Goal # 2: Mitigate Traffic Congestion along Major Routes of the MTPO Area |
Objective: Reduce travel delays between major attractions in the MTPO study area ÃÂ |
IncreaseÃÂ accessibilityÃÂ andÃÂ mobilityÃÂ of people and freight. ÃÂ Promote efficientÃÂ system managementÃÂ and operation. |
ÃÂ ÃÂ Congestion reductionÃÂ – Achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System. ÃÂ ÃÂ System reliabilityÃÂ – Improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. |
|
Objective: Seek cost-effective management solutions and new technologies as a means of addressing congestion, reducing transportation delay, improving travel time reliability, and improving system operations |
|||
|
Objective: Increase transit and other transportation demand management strategies ÃÂ |
|||
|
Objective: Enhance the flow of raw materials and manufactured products ÃÂ |
|||
|
Goal # 3: Promote Sustainable Economic Growth and Livability by Enhancing the MTPO Area Transportation System |
Objective: Maintain what we have and take a ÃĒâŽÅstate of good repairÃĒâŽÂ approach to our communityÃĒ⎙s transportation assets |
Emphasize theÃÂ preservationÃÂ of the existing transportation system. ÃÂ Improve theÃÂ resiliencyÃÂ of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation. ProtectÃÂ andÃÂ enhanceÃÂ theÃÂ environment,ÃÂ promoteÃÂ energyÃÂ conservation,ÃÂ improveÃÂ theÃÂ qualityÃÂ ofÃÂ life,ÃÂ andÃÂ promoteÃÂ consistencyÃÂ betweenÃÂ transportationÃÂ improvementsÃÂ andÃÂ StateÃÂ andÃÂ localÃÂ plannedÃÂ growthÃÂ andÃÂ economicÃÂ developmentÃÂ patterns. |
Infrastructure conditionÃÂ – Maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair. ÃÂ ÃÂ Environmental sustainabilityÃÂ – Enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment. |
|
Objective:ÃÂ ÃÂ Invest in the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight, to support sustainable economic development and improve quality of life ÃÂ |
|||
|
Objective: Promote alternative forms of transportation (such as walking, biking, and transit) |
|||
|
Objective: Support transportation investments that minimize adverse impacts of surface transportation to historical, social, cultural, and natural environments, including stormwater impacts, and reduce transportation impacts on air-quality |
|||
|
ÃÂ ÃÂ Goal # 4: Enhance Regional Access to and from the MTPO Area (continued on the next page) ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Goal # 4: Enhance Regional Access to and from the MTPO Area (continued) ÃÂ |
Objective: Maintain and improve access to regional areas outside of the MTPO area ÃÂ |
Enhance theÃÂ integrationÃÂ andÃÂ connectivityÃÂ of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. ÃÂ EnhanceÃÂ travelÃÂ andÃÂ tourism. ÃÂ ÃÂ Support theÃÂ economic vitalityÃÂ of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. |
Freight movement and economic vitalityÃÂ – Improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development. ÃÂ Reduced project delivery delaysÃÂ – Reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies’ work practices. |
|
Objective: Support transportation investments and policies that work to create jobs and improve access for people, tourism, places, and goods while embracing access management and corridor management strategies that preserve the long-term functionality of a roadwayÃĒ⎙s capacity and safety |
|||
|
Objective: Strategically target transportation investments to areas supportive of and conducive to growth and redevelopment initiatives |
|||
Figure 4àon the next page demonstrates the linkage of other state and MTPO performance-based plans that provide information for the planning of investment priorities and programming of projects into the TIP. This diagram was based on a model provided in the FHWA Transportation Performance Management Toolbox, which was adapted from the Minnesota Department of TransportationÃĒ⎙s Family of Plans.ÃÂ
ÃÂ
Figure 4
Linkage of Investment Priorities to Programming Process
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
9àààààààààIndividual Project Sheets for the FYs 2023 ÃĒâŽâ 2026 TIP
The following sections constitute the program of projects to be included in the FYs 2023-2026 TIP.ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Figure 5ÃÂ on the next page demonstrates how to read the TIP project pages.
ÃÂ
|
Length of the project (in miles) |
Figure 5:ÃÂ ÃÂ How to Read a TIP Project Page
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
Section A:ààSurface Transportation Block Grant Program ÃĒâŽâ Local Allocation to MPO Projects (STBG-L)
2017-16ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Traffic Signal for SR 34 (US 11E/E Jackson Blvd) & Tiger Way
2022-01ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Downtown Johnson City Crosswalk Safety Project
2022-02ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Johnson City Traffic Signal Grouping
2023-10ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Linear Path andÃÂ TweetsieÃÂ Trail Connector
2023-11ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Roundabout at Overmountain Drive
2023-12ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Overmountain Drive Extension
2023-13ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Traffic Management Center
2023-16ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Christian Church Road Improvements
2023-17ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Old Gray Station Road Section 2 at SR 75 Traffic Signal
2023-18ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ITS Fiber Optic Expansion
Section B: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program ÃĒâŽâààState Projects (STBG-S)
2090015àààààKnob Creek Road ÃĒâŽâ Section 2 (06040)
ÃÂ
2090565ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Urban Grouping
Section C: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
2090595àààààSafety ÃĒâŽâ Urban Grouping
Section D: National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
2090560ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ National Highway System Preservation and Operation Urban Grouping
Section E: Transit Projects (FTA)
2023-01àààààJCT Transit OperatingàÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5307
2023-02àààààJCT Capital ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5307
ÃÂ
2023-03àààààJCT Transit Capital ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5310
ÃÂ
2023-04àààààJCT Transit Capital ÃĒâŽâ Sections 5307 & 5339
ÃÂ
2023-05àààààJCT Operating ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5317 (New Freedom)
ÃÂ
2020-06àààààJCT Transit Operating ÃĒâŽâ Sec. 5316 (Job Access)
2023-07ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ NET Trans Operating Expenses
2023-08ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ NET Trans Capital Purchases (Revenue Vehicles)
2023-09ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ NET Trans Mobility Management
2023-14ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program Grouping
Section F:ÃÂ ÃÂ Transportation Alternatives
2023-19ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Historic Covered Bridge Structural Rehabilitation
2023-15ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Transportation Alternatives Program Grouping
Section G: Financial Summary Tables
Financial SummaryÃÂ of Highway Funds
ÃÂ
|
eSTIPÃÂ Fiscal Constraints Report for STIP Period 2023 Johnson City MPO |
|||||||||
|
Fund Code |
Fiscal Year |
Budget Total |
Programmed Funds |
Federal Funding |
State Funding |
Local Funding |
Federal Carryover |
Remaining Balance |
ÃÂ |
|
HIP- CRRSAA |
2023 |
$698,197 |
$698,197 |
$698,197 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP |
2023 |
$128,000 |
$128,000 |
$115,200 |
$12,800 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP |
2024 |
$16,000 |
$16,000 |
$14,400 |
$1,600 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP |
2025 |
$8,000 |
$8,000 |
$7,200 |
$800 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP |
2026 |
$8,000 |
$8,000 |
$7,200 |
$800 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP-R |
2023 |
$3,500 |
$3,500 |
$3,150 |
$350 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP-R |
2024 |
$3,500 |
$3,500 |
$3,150 |
$350 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP-R |
2025 |
$2,000 |
$2,000 |
$1,800 |
$200 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
HSIP-R |
2026 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
$900 |
$100 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
NHPP |
2023 |
$4,269,600 |
$4,269,600 |
$3,415,680 |
$853,920 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
NHPP |
2024 |
$4,119,600 |
$4,119,600 |
$3,295,680 |
$823,920 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
NHPP |
2025 |
$3,283,000 |
$3,283,000 |
$2,626,400 |
$656,600 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
NHPP |
2026 |
$2,596,400 |
$2,596,400 |
$2,077,120 |
$519,280 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L |
2023 |
$12,053,651 |
$3,356,203 |
$11,937,290 |
$0 |
$116,361 |
$10,117,022 |
$8,697,448 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L |
2024 |
$10,953,716 |
$2,680,000 |
$10,517,716 |
$0 |
$436,000 |
$8,697,448 |
$8,273,716 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L |
2025 |
$10,462,984 |
$2,375,000 |
$10,093,984 |
$0 |
$369,000 |
$8,273,716 |
$8,087,984 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L |
2026 |
$9,996,652 |
$972,000 |
$9,908,252 |
$0 |
$88,400 |
$8,087,984 |
$9,024,652 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-S |
2023 |
$4,762,000 |
$4,762,000 |
$3,809,600 |
$952,400 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-S |
2024 |
$2,154,250 |
$2,154,250 |
$1,723,400 |
$430,850 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-S |
2025 |
$1,231,000 |
$1,231,000 |
$984,800 |
$246,200 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-S |
2026 |
$307,750 |
$307,750 |
$246,200 |
$61,550 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
TAP |
2023 |
$1,696,780 |
$1,696,780 |
$1,357,424 |
$0 |
$339,356 |
$0 |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
ÃÂ
Financial Summary of STBG-L Funds (Local Allocation to MPO)
|
ÃÂ eSTIPÃÂ Financial Summary of Federal Fund Code BudgetsÃÂ ÃÂ 2023 Johnson City MPO |
||
|
STBG-L 2023 |
ÃÂ | |
|
Carryover Balance |
$10,117,022 |
ÃÂ |
|
Transfers: |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
Allocation : |
$1,820,268 |
ÃÂ |
|
TotalÃÂ FundsAvailableÃÂ : |
$11,937,290 |
ÃÂ |
|
Projects : |
$3,239,842 |
ÃÂ |
|
Remaining 2023 : |
$8,697,448 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L 2024 |
ÃÂ | |
|
Carryover Balance |
$8,697,448 |
ÃÂ |
|
Transfers: |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
Allocation : |
$1,820,268 |
ÃÂ |
|
TotalÃÂ FundsAvailableÃÂ : |
$10,517,716 |
ÃÂ |
|
Projects : |
$2,244,000 |
ÃÂ |
|
Remaining 2024 : |
$8,273,716 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L 2025 |
ÃÂ | |
|
Carryover Balance |
$8,273,716 |
ÃÂ |
|
Transfers: |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
Allocation : |
$1,820,268 |
ÃÂ |
|
TotalÃÂ FundsAvailableÃÂ : |
$10,093,984 |
ÃÂ |
|
Projects : |
$2,006,000 |
ÃÂ |
|
Remaining 2025 : |
$8,087,984 |
ÃÂ |
|
STBG-L 2026 |
ÃÂ | |
|
Carryover Balance |
$8,087,984 |
ÃÂ |
|
Transfers: |
$0 |
ÃÂ |
|
Allocation : |
$1,820,268 |
ÃÂ |
|
TotalÃÂ FundsAvailableÃÂ : |
$9,908,252 |
ÃÂ |
|
Projects : |
$883,600 |
ÃÂ |
|
Remaining 2026 : |
$9,024,652 |
ÃÂ |
Financial Summary of Transit Funds
|
eSTIPÃÂ Fiscal Constraints Report for STIP Period 2023 Johnson City MPO |
|||||||||
|
Fund Code |
Fiscal Year |
Budget Total |
Programmed Funds |
Federal Funding |
State Funding |
Local Funding |
Federal Carryover |
Remaining Balance |
ÃÂ |
|
5307-U |
2023 |
$4,331,496 |
$4,331,496 |
$2,408,397 |
$50,825 |
$1,872,274 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5307-U |
2024 |
$4,426,826 |
$4,426,826 |
$2,444,448 |
$46,025 |
$1,936,353 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5307-U |
2025 |
$4,577,073 |
$4,577,073 |
$2,522,184 |
$46,025 |
$2,008,864 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5307-U |
2026 |
$4,692,899 |
$4,692,899 |
$2,571,464 |
$41,085 |
$2,080,350 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5310(U) |
2023 |
$175,000 |
$175,000 |
$146,250 |
$14,375 |
$14,375 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5310(U) |
2024 |
$178,750 |
$178,750 |
$149,438 |
$14,656 |
$14,656 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5310(U) |
2025 |
$226,667 |
$226,667 |
$187,771 |
$19,448 |
$19,448 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5310(U) |
2026 |
$299,353 |
$299,353 |
$179,483 |
$59,935 |
$59,935 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5316 |
2023 |
$56,274 |
$56,274 |
$28,137 |
$14,068 |
$14,069 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5316 |
2024 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
$25,000 |
$12,500 |
$12,500 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5317 |
2023 |
$129,980 |
$129,980 |
$64,990 |
$32,495 |
$32,495 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5317 |
2024 |
$111,700 |
$111,700 |
$55,850 |
$27,925 |
$27,925 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5339 |
2023 |
$260,191 |
$260,191 |
$218,153 |
$21,019 |
$21,019 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5339 |
2024 |
$273,201 |
$273,201 |
$229,061 |
$22,070 |
$22,070 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5339 |
2025 |
$276,361 |
$276,361 |
$231,589 |
$22,386 |
$22,386 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
|
5339 |
2026 |
$279,679 |
$279,679 |
$234,243 |
$22,718 |
$22,718 |
ÃÂ |
$0ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ $0 |
ÃÂ |
ÃÂ
Appendix A:ÃÂ ÃÂ Public Participation Documentation
Appendix B: Memorandum of Agreement
Please note, the Memorandum of Agreement is currently being drafted and reviewed by TDOT and FHWA. Once the agreement has been finalized, it will be provided to the MPOs for signature and inclusion in the final TIP document.
ÃÂ
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE JOHNSON CITY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
REGARDING THE DEFINITION AND NEED FOR AMENDMENTSÃÂ IÃÂ ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMÃÂ IÃÂ TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS IN THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
ÃÂ
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this Memorandum of Agreement is to establish two categories of actions to meet Federal requirements and streamline the maintenance of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program/Transportation Improvement Program (STIP/TIP).ÃÂ ÃÂ One category of action is a “STIP/TIP Amendment” and the other is a “STIP/TIP Administrative Modification.”
DEFINING THE STIP/TIP:
As detailed in Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 450, the STIP is defined in Federal regulations as ÃĒâŽÅa statewide prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of 4 years that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan, metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.ÃĒâŽÂ All projects and groupings in the STIP and TIPs must list the eligible funding source(s) (e.g., FTA Section program, Surface Transportation Block Grant, etc.). Approval authority over the STIP and all STIP amendments lies with FHWA and FTA.
Per 23 CFR 450.218, the State of Tennessee STIP shall include each metropolitan TIP for each MPO in Tennessee, as approved by the associated MPO and TDOT (as delegated authority from the Governor of the State of Tennessee). Per Federal regulations, TDOT can elect to include the metropolitan TIPs in the STIP directly or by reference, with specific expectations for each option:
- Direct inclusion of the metropolitan TIP ÃĒâŽâ in this situation, TDOTÃĒ⎙s STIP, as published and approved by FHWA and FTA, will include all projects listed in the approved metropolitan TIP, regardless of project sponsor or funding source. Accordingly, FHWA and FTA will match authorization requests for all projects across the State of Tennessee to the latest approved/amended STIP.
- Inclusion of the metropolitan TIP by reference ÃĒâŽâ in this situation, TDOTÃĒ⎙s STIP, as published and approved by FHWA and FTA, will make narrative reference to the metropolitan TIPs, as approved by the MPO and TDOT. Accordingly, FHWA and FTA will match all authorization requests for projects in metropolitan areas to the latest approved/amended metropolitan TIP, and all authorization requests for projects in non-metropolitan areas will be matched to the latest approved/amended STIP.
ÃÂ
More information on the amendment/administrative modification processes and authorization requests is available below.
STIP/TIP AMENDMENT:
An amendment is a revision to the STIP/TIP that involves major changes to a project or the overall program and must meet the requirements of 23 CFR ç450.216 and ç450.326 regarding public review and comment, re-demonstration of fiscal constraint, and transportation conformity. An amendment is required when changes to the STIP/TIP include:
- A major change in the total project cost (excluding groupings) (see discussion on project cost change thresholds with Table A); or
- Adding a new project or deleting a project from the STIP/TIP; or
- A major change of project scope; examples include, but are not limited to, changing the number of through-lanes, adding/deleting non-motorized facilities (i.e. greenways, sidewalks, bike lanes, transfer stations, etc.), changing mode (e.g., rolling stock or facility type for transit, such as light rail cars instead of trolleys, vans instead of buses, etc. ), changing capital category (i.e., transit funding added to a CMAQ funded project or CMAQ funding substituted for transit funding), or changing termini; or
- Any change requiring a new regional air quality conformity finding (including a grouping); or
- Moving funds between a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) TIP and STIP unless a written agreement exists between the MPO and the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) that such an action may be a processed as an administrative modification; or
- Moving funds between an MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP and another MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP unless a written agreement exists between each MPO and TDOT that such an action may be processed as an administrative modification.
ÃÂ
AMENDMENT DOCUMENT AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES:
The STIP/TIP may be amended at any time, but amendments require Federal approval and redetermination of STIP/TIP fiscal constraint and air quality conformity, where applicable. TDOT will review each TIP amendment, approve its inclusion in the STIP, and submit the amendment to the appropriate Federal Agency.ÃÂ ÃÂ The Federal Agencies willÃÂ independently review and respond to a formal written request for amendment approval from TDOT within 10 business days of receipt.
Documentation:
The MPO will send the following documentation to TDOT:
- Electronic correspondence describing the action taken and requesting review and approval of the proposed amendment;
- A copy of the original and amended TIP pages;
- Documentation supporting:
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Fiscal constraint,
oààààààInterested partiesÃĒ⎙ participation (i.e., public involvement, stakeholder involvement,
and consultation),
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Air quality conformity (in non-attainment and/or maintenance areas only), and
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Required MPO certifications, including the MPO Self-Certification with a current date; and
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The resolution adopting the amendment.
For financial transactions, the MPO must identify in the documentation the origin and destination of the funds being moved.
Regardless of whether the metropolitan TIP is included directly or by reference into the STIP, both the MPO and TDOT (through authority delegated by the Governor of Tennessee) must approve any TIP amendment including State managed projects before transmittal to FHWA/FTA for inclusion in the STIP. FHWA and FTA still retain authority over the inclusion of any amendments into the STIP, whether the TIP is included directly or by reference. In both cases, TDOT shall send the above-described documentation to FHWA/FTA for review and approval of the TIP amendment, along with a current Self-Certification for the STIP.
When FHWA or FTA approves an amendment, the appropriate approving agency will send to TDOT and the MPO:
- The original amendment review request,
- The original supporting amendment documentation, and
- Letter documenting FHWA’s or FTA’s approval.
- For transit projects, the Multimodal office should work with the Program Development and Scheduling office to ensure that any amendments are included in the updated STIP.ÃÂ
Amendment documentation will conform to the correspondence standards outlined in Appendix A.
STIP/TIP ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATIONS:
A STIP/TIP administrative modification is a minor change from the approved STIP/TIP. Administrative modifications must be consistent with 23 CFR Part 450, but they do not require public review and comment, or a conformity determination in non-attainment or maintenance areas. STIP/TIP administrative modifications are defined as follows:
- A minor change in the total project cost (see Table A)
- A minor change in project description that does not change the air quality conformity
finding in maintenance and/or non-attainment areas; or
- A minor change in project description/termini that is for clarification and does not change
the project scope such as a length change for reasonable transition purposes or to correct minor clerical errors or discrepancies; or
- Shifting funds between projects or groupings within the STIP/TIP (i.e., funding sources and projects already identified in the STIP/TIP) if the change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see Table A) for the total project cost of all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
- Adding an amount of funds already identified in the STIP/TIP for the current or previous
year(s) if:
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The funds are currently identified in the STIP/TIP either in an existing project or as available funds and
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ The change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (project cost change thresholds listed in Table A) for the total project cost of all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
- Moving project phases or funding from year to year within an approved STIP/TIP, except those that cross air quality horizon years of the project; or
- Adding any phase (if total project cost includes all phases), such as environmental or location study, preliminary engineering, right-of-way, or construction to a project in the STIP/TIP so long as such a change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see Table A) for the total project cost of all phases shown within the approved/amended STIP/TIP; or
- Changes required to follow FHWA or FTA instructions as to the withdrawal of funds or
re-establishment of funds withdrawn at the request of FHWA or FTA; or
- Moving funds between similarly labeled groupings, regardless of percent of change, or adding or removing a project(s) to or from an already established grouping; or
- Adjustments in revenue to match actual revenue receipts; or
ÃÂ
- Adding a project with 100% state or non-federal funding for all phasesÃÂ thatÃÂ does notÃÂ change the airÃÂ qualityÃÂ conformity finding inÃÂ maintenanceÃÂ and/or non-attainment areas; or
ÃÂ
- Adding or changing a funding source, as long as the change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see Table A);
ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION DOCUMENT PROCEDURES:
Administrative modifications do not require Federal approval. Accordingly, no interested partiesÃĒ⎙ participation or air quality conformity is required. TDOT and the MPOs will work cooperatively to address and respond to any FHWA and/or FTA comment(s). FHWA and FTA reserve the right to question any administrative action that is not consistent with Federal regulations or with this MOA.ààAdministrative modifications made to TDOT-sponsored projects in the TIP will be requested by TDOT through notification to the MPO upon submission of the administrative modification to FHWA/FTA.ààThe MPO will make the changes to funding tables, and project sheets as needed without the need for distribution.
Documentation:
The MPO will send the following documentation to TDOT for locally-sponsored projects:
ÃÂ
- Electronic correspondence describing the action taken;
- A copy of the original and modified TIP pages.
For financial transactions, the MPO must identify in the documentation the origin and destination of the funds being moved. Administrative modification documentation will conform to the correspondence standards outlined in AppendixÃÂ A.
AUTHORIZATION:
FHWA and FTA match project authorization requests to the STIP/TIP prior to approving a request for project authorization. Therefore, all administrative modifications and amendments must be processed to completion prior to TDOT requesting federal authorization approvals. For projects in MPO areas TDOT must ensure FHWA and FTA receipt of documented notification that the respective MPO has accounted for the administrative modification unless TDOT has a formal agreement with the respective MPO stating otherwise.
In the FMIS authorization request, TDOT shall provide the most recent amendment and administrative modification numbers affecting the project in the “STIP Reference” field or in the “State Remarks” if additional space is required.
ÃÂ
PROJECT COST CHANGE THRESHOLDS:
For changes to the cost of projects (excluding groupings and reductions of any amount provided project length, termini, and description remain the same), a sliding scale (see Table A) is outlined to determine which category of revision is required. All measurements for these cost changes will be made from the last approved STIP or STIP amendment/administrative modification to account for incremental changes.
TABLE A
|
Total programmed funding within the approved STIP/TIP |
Amendment |
Administrative Modification |
|
Up to $2 million |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ75% |
< 75% |
|
$2 million to $15 million |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ50% |
< 50% |
|
$15 million to $75 million |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ40% |
< 40% |
|
$75 million and above |
ÃĒâ°ÂĨ30% |
< 30% |
ÃÂ
PROJECT PHASE OVERRUNS AND UNDERRUNS:
Project overruns and underruns for previously authorized phases of projects in a previous TIP will not be programmed in the current TIP. If the phase of the project is in the current TIP then the rules of this document will apply; however, if the phase of the project was authorized in a previous TIP no action will be necessary within the current TIP. If a project programmed in a grouping incurs an overrun or underrun from a previously authorized phase, no TIP action will be needed. Any request for authorization of a new phase will need to follow the rules within this document.
- If a project is being closed out but incurs an overrun, it will not require an amendment or administrative modification.
ÃÂ
PROJECT GROUPINGS:
The use of project groupings is permitted under 23 CFR ç450.218(j) for projects located in the non-metropolitan portion of the STIP and 23 CFR ç450.326(h) for projects in an MPO’s TIP. Projects that are funded by such groupings are to be of a scale small enough not to warrant individual identification and may be grouped by function, work type, and/or geographic area using the applicable classifications under 23 CFR ç771.117(c) and (d) and/or 40 CFR part 93. Project groupings may only include projects that meet the following conditions: non-regionally significant, environmentally neutral, and exempt from air quality conformity. As appropriate, in instances where it is uncertain if specific project(s) meet those conditions in air quality nonattainment or maintenance areas, the sponsoring agency, in coordination with the MPO, must consult with the appropriate Interagency Consultation group (IAC) to determine whether the specific project(s) proposed to be included with the grouping are subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 93.
The STIP/TIP will include a description of all grouping categories, eligible activities, and sufficient financial information to demonstrate the projects that are to be implemented using current and/or reasonably available revenues. The MPO will develop the grouping categories and eligible activities included within the STIP/TIP in consultation with TDOT. All TDOT-sponsored projects located within an MPO area must be included in the MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP, including those projects that are eligible for grouping. Therefore, projects eligible for groupings that are located within the MPO planning area may be grouped within the MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP or listed individually in the MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP, but may not be included in the STIP.
ÃÂ
PROJECTS IN RURAL/URBAN AREAS AND PROJECTS IN TWO (2) OR MORE MPOs
All projects that cross the MPO boundary and include an area outside of the MPO boundary will be programmed in the TIP only.
In instances where a project is in two (2) or more MPO planning areas, the affected MPOs will consult and coordinate as to which MPO is most impacted by the project, taking into consideration project limits, air quality conformity requirements, regional significance, etc.ÃÂ ÃÂ The MPO most impacted will program the project in its TIP and include it in the demonstration of fiscal constraint.ÃÂ ÃÂ The other MPO(s) will reference the project in its TIP for informational purposes. In instances where the MPOs are unable to reach an agreement, TDOT will facilitate a consultation process with the affected MPOs, TDOT, and FHWA/FTA.
CONSULTATION PROCESS:
The MPO will consult with TDOT and the appropriate approving agency (i.e., FTA for transit projects and FHWA for highway projects) on the suitable category of action when the proposed change to the STIP/TIP does not clearly fall into the category of a “STIP/TIP Amendment” or a “STIP/TIP Administrative Modification” or the proposed change involves extenuating circumstances. Consultations will suspend the formal 10 business day review period for “STIP/TIP Amendments” until a resolution is established. The MPO also will consult with the appropriate approving agency prior to adding new non-formula or specialized federal funds (such as BUILD program funds) to a project to determine if the addition of the funds would warrant an amendment.
PROCESS REVIEW:
The MPO and TDOT will review this agreement in conjunction with each Statewide Planning Finding or when STIP/TIP management procedures are substantively changed (e.g., implementation of an electronic STIP/TIP). The focus of the review is to verify the appropriate use of the agreed-to amendment and administrative modification processes and consistency with Federal regulations.
We, the undersigned, approve this Memorandum of Agreement. This Agreement will become effective upon approval of signature by all parties, and will remain in effect as long as each agency agrees to and abides by the conditions set forth in this document. This Agreement may be amended at any time, but revisions will require signature by all parties. Any signatory to this Agreement may propose amendment to the agreement at any time.
All prior agreements and correspondence related to the definition and need for amendments or administrative modifications to STIP/TIPs are voided with the execution of this agreement.
SIGNATURES:
_______________________________________________ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ______________________
Randy Trivette, ChairÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Date
Johnson City MTPO Executive Board
_______________________________________________ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ______________________
ButchÃÂ Eley, CommissionerÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Date
Tennessee Department of Transportation
APPENDIX A: CORRESPONDENCE STANDARDS
All amendment and administrative modification correspondence will be submitted to TDOTÃĒ⎙s Program Development and Scheduling Office.ààThe MPO will submit the correspondence and documentation toàSTIP.Requests@tn.govàand the Program Monitor in the Program Development and Scheduling Office responsible for the TDOT Region in which the MPO is located.
Amendment Documentation:
Amendment documentation will be grouped in a single electronic document with the naming convention, “Amendment [X] ([Project#])”, where [X] identifies the amendment’s sequential identifier and [Project #] represents the unique project number(s) of the program element(s) being amended.
Email correspondence will use the naming convention, “Amendment [X], [Organization]” in the subject line where [X] identifies the amendment’s sequential identifier and [Organization] represents name of the organization (MPO) submitting the amendment. The body of the email or cover letter/project description within the packet will include all applicable information as needed such as: amendment number, PIN, STIP/TIP ID, project sponsor, location of project, route, termini, project description, funding type (e.g., STBG, 5310), length, and description of amendment. Correspondence will include ccs to the appropriate representatives within TDOTÃĒ⎙s Long Range Planning Division and/or Multimodal Resources Division.
Modification Documentation:
Modification documentation will be grouped in a single electronic file and use the naming convention, “Modification [X] ([Project#])”, where [X] identifies the administrative modification’s sequential identifier and [Project #] represents the unique project number(s) of the program element(s) being modified.
Email correspondence will use the naming convention, “Modification [X], [Organization]” in the subject line where [X] identifies the administrative modificationÃĒ⎙s sequential identifier and [Organization] represents name of the organization (MPO) submitting the administrative modification. The body of the email or cover letter/project description within the packet will include all applicable information as needed such as: modification number, PIN, STIP/TIP ID, project sponsor, location of project, route, termini, project description, funding type (e.g., STBG, 5310), length, and description of amendment. Correspondence will include ccs to the appropriate representatives within TDOTÃĒ⎙s Long Range Planning Division and/or Multimodal Resources Division.
Appendix C:ÃÂ ÃÂ Statewide Grouping Descriptions
Activities delivered from TDOTÃĒ⎙s statewide groupings are limited to work types that are:
1)ààààààààààààààààààLocated in non-metropolitan or rural areas ÃĒâŽâ any located in a metropolitan area mustàbe
programmed in the MPOÃĒ⎙s TIP,
2)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Not considered to be of appropriate scale for individual identification in a given programÃÂ year,
3)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Environmentally neutral as categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.117(c) andÃÂ (d),
4)ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Non-regionally significant, in non-attainment and maintenance areas,ÃÂ and
5)ààààààààààààààààààExempt as defined in the EPAÃĒ⎙s transportation conformity regulations in 40 CFR Part 93, in non- attainment and maintenanceàareas.
Activities that do not meet these requirements must be individually identified in the STIP or respective MPOÃĒ⎙s
TIP. The following tables elaborate on the allowable work types for the statewide groupings.
Statewide Grouping Crosswalk
ÃÂ
|
Travel Congestion and Clean Air Improvement Grouping (2399000094) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality for areas not meeting standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (non-attainment) and for former non-attainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas). |
÷àààààààState planning andàresearch ÷àààààààInstallation of vehicleÃĒâŽÂtoÃĒâŽÂinfrastructureàcommunications equipment ÷àààààààElectricàvehicleàandànaturalàgasàvehicleàinfrastructure ÷àààààààDieselàretrofitsàforàPMà2.5ànonÃĒâŽÂattainmentàoràmaintenance areas ÷àààààààUse verified technology for nonÃĒâŽÂroad vehicles and engines used in portÃĒâŽÂ related freight operations for PM 2.5 nonÃĒâŽÂ attainmentàoràmaintenanceàareasàunderà23àU.S.C.àoràChapter 53 of 49àU.S.C. ÷àààààààInstall diesel emission control technology on nonÃĒâŽÂroadàdiesel equipmentàoràsuchàequipment thatàis usedàonàhighway construction projects for PM 2.5 nonÃĒâŽÂattainment or maintenance areas. ÷àààààààEstablish/operate a traffic monitoring, management,àand control facility oràprogram oààààImproveàsignalization oààààTransportation DemandàManagement oààààBicycle and PedestrianàFacilities oààààPublic Outreach andàEducation oààààCarpooling/Vanpooling ÷àààààààBuildàhighàoccupancyàvehicleà(HOV)àlanes ÷àààààààIntersectionàimprovement. ÷àààààààAdd turningàlanes ÷àààààààImproveàtransportationàsystemsàmanagementàandàoperations ÷àààààààImplement intelligent transportationàsystemsà(ITS) |
ÃÂ
|
Travel Congestion and Clean Air Improvement Grouping (2399000094) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
| ÃÂ |
÷àààààààPurchase dieselàretrofits ÷àààààààProvide information and technical assistance to owners/operators of diesel equipment andàvehicles. ÷àààààààTheàmostàcostÃĒâŽÂeffectiveàprojectsàtoàreduceàemissionsàfromàportÃĒâŽÂ related landside nonÃĒâŽÂroad or on road equipment that is operated within the boundaries of the area [23 U.S.C.149(k)(2) &à(4) ÷àààààààShared micro mobility, including bike-sharing and shared scooter systems; [ç11115(1); 23 U.S.C.à149(b)(7); ÷àààààààThe purchase of diesel replacements, or medium-duty or heavy-duty zero emission vehicles and related charging equipment; [ç23 U.S.C.à149(b)(8)]; ÷àààààààModernization or rehabilitation of a lock and dam, or a marine highway corridor, connector, or crossing if functionally connected to the Federal-aid highway system and likely to contribute to attainment or maintenance of national ambient air quality standards (capped at 10% of CMAQ apportionment); and [ç1115(1) and (2); 23 U.S.C. 149(b)(10), (b)(11), andà(c)(4)] ÷àààààààIn alternative fuel projects, vehicle refueling infrastructure that would reduce emissions from nonroad vehicles and nonroad engines used in construction projects or port-relatedàfreight operations. [ç 1115(3); 23 U.S.C. 149(f)(4)(A) |
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
|
Safety Grouping (2300000088) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Any strategy, activity or project on a public road that is consistent with the dataÃĒâŽÂdriven State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem, including workforce development, training, and education activities. Eligibility of specific projects, strategies, and activities is generally based on: ÷àààààààConsistency withàSHSP, ÷àààààààCrash experience, crash potential, or other dataÃĒâŽÂ supported means, Compliance with the requirements ofàTitleà23àofàthe U.S.C., and |
ààààààà÷àààààààIntersection safetyàimprovements ÷àààààààPavementàandàshoulderàwideningà(includingàaàpassingàlane to remedy an unsafe condition) ÷àààààààInstallation of rumble strips or another warning devices, if theyàdo notàadverselyàaffectàtheàsafetyàoràmobilityàofàbicyclists andàpedestrians ÷àààààààInstallation of skidÃĒâŽÂresistant surface at intersectionsàor locations with high crashàfrequencies |
ÃÂ
|
Safety Grouping (2300000088) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààStateÃĒ⎙s strategic or performanceÃĒâŽÂ based safety goals to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on all publicàroads. ÷àààààààProjects to upgrade railwayÃĒâŽÂ highway grade crossings by eliminating hazards andàinstallingàprotectiveàdevices. |
÷àààààààImprovementsàforàpedestrianàoràbicyclistàsafety ÷àààààààConstruction and improvement of a railwayÃĒâŽÂhighway grade crossing safetyàfeature, including installationàofàprotectiveàdevices ÷àààààààThe conductàof aàmodel traffic enforcement activityàat aàrailwayÃĒâŽÂ highway crossing ÷àààààààConstructionàof aàtraffic calmingàfeature ÷àààààààEliminationàof aàroadsideàhazard ÷àààààààInstallation, replacement,àand otheràimprovementsàofàhighway signageàandàpavement markings,àor aàprojectàtoàmaintain minimumàlevels ofàretroÃĒâŽÂreflectivity that addressesàaàhighwayàsafetyàproblem consistentàwithàtheàSHSP ÷àààààààInstallationàofàemergency vehicle priorityàcontrolàsystemsàatàsignalizedàintersections ÷àààààààInstallationàofàtraffic controlàor otheràwarning devicesàatàlocationsàwithàhighàcrashàpotential ÷àààààààTransportation safetyàplanning ÷àààààààCollection, analysis, and improvementàofàsafetyàdata ÷àààààààPlanning integrated interoperable emergency communications equipmentàoràoperationalàoràtraffic enforcement activities (including police assistance) relatedàtoàwork zoneàsafety ÷àààààààInstallationàofàguardrails,àbarriersà(including barriersàbetweenàconstructionàworkàzones and traffic lanes),àand crashàattenuators. ÷àààààààThe additionàoràretrofittingàofàstructuresàor otheràmeasuresàtoàeliminateàoràreduce crashes involving vehicles andàwildlife ÷àààààààInstallationàofàyellowÃĒâŽÂgreen signsàandàsignalsàatàpedestrianàand bicycle crossings and in school zones. ÷àààààààConstruction and operational improvementsàonàhighàriskàrural roads. ÷àààààààGeometric improvements toàa road foràsafety purposes that improveàsafety. ÷àààààààRoadàsafetyàaudits. ÷àààààààRoadway safety infrastructure improvements consistentàwithàFHWAÃĒ⎙s ÃĒâŽÅHighway Design HandbookàforàOlder Drivers and PedestriansÃĒâŽÂà(FHWAÃĒâŽÂRDÃĒâŽÂ01ÃĒâŽÂ103) ÷àààààààTruck parking facilities eligibleàforàfunding |
ÃÂ
|
Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (HIP-CRRSAA) Grouping |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Bridges, tunnels, including designated routes of the Appalachian development highway system and local access roads under Section 14501 of Title 40. Provide funding to address corona virus disease 2019 (Covid 19) impacts related to Highway Infrastructure Programs. |
÷àààààààPreventativeàMaintenanceàasàdiscussedàinà23àU.S.C. 116 (e); ÷àààààààRoutineàMaintenance. However,àif it isàperformedàbyàcontract,àstatesàandàsubrecipientsàmust followà2àCFRà200.317.àRoutine maintenanceàmayàalsoàbeàperformedàbyàstateàoràlocal forces through normalàoperations. ÷àààààààOperations costsàmayàinclude,àbut areànot limitedàto,àlabor costs,àadministrativeàcosts, costsàofàutilities,àandàrent,àfor theàhighway surfaceàtransportationàoperationsàofàstateàDOTsàoràlocalàgovernments. ÷àààààààSalariesàofàemployees (includingàthose employees who haveàbeenàplacedàonàadministrativeàleave)àoràcontractors. ÷àààààààTheàdebtàserviceàcostsàallocableàto theàhighwayàsurfaceàtransportation projects associatedàwith the bondàissuance. ÷àààààààFundsàforàavailabilityàpaymentsàrelatedàtoàhighway surface transportation. ÷àààààààTheàstate incurredàaàcostàfor theàidentifiedàÃĒâŽÅSpecialàAuthorityÃĒâŽÂàcostàobjective(s)àand theàstateàdemonstratesàthatàaàcost was incurredàandàisàallocableàtoàtheàidentified HIP-CRRSAAàcostàobjective(s); ÷àààààààProjectsàwithàaàpublic tolling agencyàoràferry system,àpreferablyàthroughàaàsubrecipientà/subaward type grantàagreementàbetween the entity and the state. ÷àààààààSTBGàeligibleàactivitiesàinà23àUSCà133(b). ÷àààààààAdvanceàConstruction conversion, obligationàandàoutlayàforàprojects prioràtoàincurrenceàofàcostàandàwhich have been includedàinàaàSTIP. |
ÃÂ
|
National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Grouping |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Projects for the preservation and improvement of the conditions and performance of the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN), including: à÷àààààààRehabilitation, resurfacing, preservation, andàoperationalàimprovements. ÷àààààààTrafficàoperations. ÷àààààààEnvironmentalàmitigation. ÷àààààààStatewideàstudies. ÷àààààààDataàcollection ÷àààààààinvesting in infrastructure and operational improvements that strengthen economic competitiveness, reduce congestion, reduce the cost of freight transportation, improve reliability, and increaseàproductivity. ÷àààààààimproving the safety, security, efficiency, and resiliency of freight transportation in rural and urban areas. ÷àààààààimproving the state of good repair of theàNHFN. ÷àààààààusing innovation and advanced technology to improve NHFN safety, efficiency, andàreliability. ÷àààààààimproving the efficiency and productivity of theàNHFN. ÷àààààààimproving State flexibility to support multi-State corridor planning and address highway freight connectivity;àand ÷àààààààreducing the environmental impacts of freight movement on the NHFN. [23 U.S.C. 167(a) andà(b)] ÷àààààààProject is functionally connected to the NHFN and likely to reduce on- road mobile source emissions [ç11114(3)(D); 23 U.S.C. 167(h) (5)(b)(iii) andà(vi)} |
÷àààààààDevelopment phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstructionàactivities. ÷àààààààConstruction,àreconstruction,àrehabilitation,àacquisitionàof real property (including land relating to the project and improvements to the land), construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements directly relating toàimproving system performance. ÷àààààààIntelligentàtransportationàsystemsàandàotheràtechnologyàto improve the flow of freight, including intelligent freight transportationàsystems. ÷àààààààEffortsàtoàreduceàtheàenvironmentalàimpactsàofàfreight movement. ÷àààààààEnvironmentalàandàcommunityàmitigationàforàfreight movement. ÷àààààààRailwayÃĒâŽÂhighway gradeàseparation. ÷àààààààGeometricàimprovementsàtoàinterchangesàandàramps. ÷àààààààTruckÃĒâŽÂonlyàlanes. ÷àààààààClimbing and runaway truckàlanes. ÷àààààààAdding or wideningàshoulders. ÷àààààààTruckàparkingàfacilitiesàeligibleàforàfundingàunderàsection 1401 of MAPÃĒâŽÂ21. ÷àààààààRealÃĒâŽÂtime traffic, truck parking, roadway condition,àand multimodal transportation informationàsystems. ÷àààààààElectronicàscreeningàandàcredentialingàsystemsàforàvehicles, including weighÃĒâŽÂinÃĒâŽÂmotion truck inspection technologies. ÷àààààààTrafficàsignalàoptimization,àincludingàsynchronizedàand adaptiveàsignals. ÷àààààààWorkàzoneàmanagementàandàinformationàsystems. ÷àààààààHighway rampàmetering. ÷àààààààElectronic cargo and border security technologiesàthat improve truck freightàmovement. ÷àààààààIntelligentàtransportationàsystemsàthatàwouldàincreaseàtruck freight efficiencies inside the boundaries of intermodal facilities. ÷àààààààAdditionalàroadàcapacityàtoàaddressàhighwayàfreight bottlenecks. ÷àààààààPhysicalàseparationàofàpassengeràvehiclesàfromàcommercial motoràfreight. |
ÃÂ
|
National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) Grouping (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
| ÃÂ |
÷àààààààEnhancement of the resiliency of critical highway infrastructure, including highway infrastructure thatàsupports national energy security, to improve the flow ofàfreight. ÷àààààààA highway or bridge project, other than a projectàpreviously described, to improve the flow of freight on the National Highway FreightàNetwork. ÷àààààààAny other surface transportation project to improve the flow of freight into and out of a public or private freight rail or water facility (including ports), and facilities that provide surface transportation infrastructure necessary to facilitate directàintermodalàinterchange,àtransfer,àandàaccessàintoàoràout of theàfacility. ÷àààààààFor the modernization of a lock or dam,àor ÷àààààààOn a marine highway corridor, connector, or crossingà(including an inland waterway corridor, connector, oràcrossing) |
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
|
National Highway System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000076) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààRehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, preservation,àand operationalàimprovements, ÷àààààààTrafficàoperations, ÷àààààààBridge andàtunnelàimprovements, ÷àààààààSafetyàimprovements, ÷àààààààBicycle andàpedestrianàimprovements, and ÷àààààààEnvironmentalàmitigation. ÷àààààààProvide support for activities to increaseàtheàresiliencyàofàTheàNHSàto mitigateàtheàcostàofàdamageàfromàsea level rise, extreme weather events, flooding, wildfires, or other natural disasters. |
÷àààààààMinor rehabilitation, pavement resurfacing, preventative maintenance, restoration, and pavement preservation treatments to extend the service life of highwayàinfrastructure, including pavement markings and improvements to roadside hardware or sightàdistance ÷àààààààHighway improvement work including slide repair, rock fall mitigation, drainage repairs, or other preventative work necessary to maintain or extend the service life of the existing infrastructure in a good operationalàcondition ÷àààààààMinoràoperationalàandàsafetyàimprovementsàto intersectionsàand interchanges such as adding turn lanes, addressing existing geometricàdeficiencies,àandàextendingàon/offàramps ÷àààààààCapitalàandàoperatingàcostsàforàintelligentàtransportation systems (ITS) and traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities andàprograms: ÷àààààààInfrastructureÃĒâŽÂbased intelligentàtransportation systems (ITS) capitalàimprovements. ÷àààààààTrafficàManagementàCenterà(TMC)àoperationsàandàutilities. |
ÃÂ
|
National Highway System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000076) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
| ÃÂ |
÷àààààààFreeway serviceàpatrols. ÷àààààààTraveleràinformation. ÷àààààààBridge and tunnel construction (no additional travel lanes), replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, inspection, evaluation, and inspector training and inspection and evaluation of other infrastructure assets, such as signs, walls, and drainageàstructures. ÷àààààààDevelopment and implementation of a State Asset Management Plan including data collection, maintenance and integration, software costs, and equipment costs that support the development of performanceÃĒâŽÂ based management systems foràinfrastructure. ÷àààààààRailÃĒâŽÂhighway grade crossingàimprovements. ÷àààààààHighway safetyàimprovements: ÷àààààààInstallationàofànewàoràimprovementàofàexistingàguardrail. ÷àààààààInstallation of traffic signs andàsignals/lights. ÷àààààààSpot safetyàimprovements. ÷àààààààSidewalkàimprovements. ÷àààààààPedestrian and/or bicycleàfacilities. ÷àààààààTrafficàcalmingàandàtrafficàdiversionàimprovements. ÷àààààààNoiseàwalls, ÷àààààààWetland and/or streamàmitigation, ÷àààààààEnvironmental restorationàand pollutionàabatement, ÷àààààààControlàofànoxiousàweedsàandàestablishmentàofànativeàspecies. ÷àààààààProjects authorized from this grouping may be authorized with different Federal percentages than shown in the grid based on one or more of theàfollowing: ÃĒâŽÂĒààà90%àforàcertainàInterstateàprojects underà23àU.S.C. 120(a);àor ÃĒâŽÂĒààà100% for certain safety items under 23 U.S.C. 120(c);àor ÃĒâŽÂĒààà100%àforàAppalachianàDevelopmentàHighwayàSystem (ADHS) projects under MAPÃĒâŽÂ21 ç1528 and 40 U.S.C. 14501 ÷àààààààUnderground public utility infrastructure carried out in conjunction with an otherwise eligibleàproject; ÷àààààààResiliency improvements on the NHS, including protective features; ÷àààààààActivities to protect NHS segments from cybersecurityàthreats. |
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000090) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Projects and programs for the preservation and improvement of the conditions and performance of FederalÃĒâŽÂ aid highways and public roads, including: ÷àààààààRehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, preservation,àand operational improvementsàon FederalÃĒâŽÂaid highways and designated routes of the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) and local access roads underà40 U.S.C. 14501, ÷àààààààTrafficàoperationsàonàFederalÃĒâŽÂaid highways, ÷àààààààBridgeàandàtunnelàimprovements on publicàroads, ÷àààààààSafetyàimprovementsàonàpublicàroads, ÷àààààààEnvironmentalàmitigation ÷àààààààScenicàandàhistoricàhighwayàprograms, ÷àààààààLandscaping andàscenicàbeautification, ÷àààààààHistoricàpreservation, ÷àààààààInfrastructure projects for improvingànonÃĒâŽÂdriveràaccessàto public transportation and enhancedàmobility, ÷àààààààCommunityàimprovementàactivities |
ActivitiesàpreviouslyàauthorizedàunderàtheàSurfaceàTransportation Programà(STP): ÷àààMinor rehabilitation, pavement resurfacing, preventative maintenance, restoration, and pavement preservation treatments to extend the service life of highway infrastructure, including pavement markings and improvements to roadside hardware or sightàdistance ÷àààHighway improvement work including slide repair, rock fall mitigation, drainage repairs, or other preventative work necessary to maintain or extend the service life of the existing infrastructure in a good operationalàcondition ÷àààMinoràoperationalàandàsafetyàimprovementsàto intersectionsàand interchanges such as adding turn lanes, addressingàexistingàgeometric deficiencies and extendingàon/offàramps. ÷àààCapital and operating costs for intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and traffic monitoring, management, and control facilities andàprograms: oààInfrastructureÃĒâŽÂbased intelligent transportation systems (ITS) capitalàimprovements. oààTrafficàManagementàCenterà(TMC)àoperationsàand utilities. oààFreeway serviceàpatrols, oààTraveleràinformation. ÷àààBridge and tunnel construction (no additional travel lanes), replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, inspection, evaluation, and inspector training and inspection and evaluation of other infrastructure assets, such as signs, walls, and drainageàstructures ÷àààDevelopment and implementation of a State Asset Management Plan including data collection, maintenance and integration, software costs, and equipment costs that support the development of performanceÃĒâŽÂ based management systems foràinfrastructure. ÷àààRail ÃĒâŽÂ Highway grade crossingàimprovements |
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000090) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
| ÃÂ |
÷àààHighway safetyàimprovements: oààInstallationàofànewàoràimprovementàofàexistingàguardrail. oààInstallationàofàtrafficàsignsàandàsignals/lights. oààSpot safetyàimprovements. ÷àààSidewalkàimprovements, ÷àààPedestrian and/or bicycleàfacilities, ÷àààTrafficàcalmingàandàtrafficàdiversionàimprovements, ÷àààTransportationàAlternativesàasàdefinedàbyà23 ÷àààààààU.S.C.à213(B),à23àU.S.C.à101(A)(29),àandàSectionà1122àofàMAPÃĒâŽÂ21. ÷àààNoiseàwalls, ÷àààWetland and/or streamàmitigation, ÷àààEnvironmental restorationàand pollutionàabatement, ÷àààControl of noxious weeds and establishment of native species ÷àààààààPrivately-owned or majority-privately owned, ferry boats and terminal facilities that, as determined by the Secretary, provide a substantial public transportation benefit or otherwise meet the foremost needs of the surface transportation system.à[23 U.S.C. 133(b)(1)(B)]; ÷àààààààWildlife crossing structures, and projects and strategies designed to reduce the number of wildlife-vehicle collisions [23 U.S.C. 133(b)(1)(G); 23 U.S.C.à133(b)(14)]; ÷àààààààThe addition or retrofitting of structures or other measures to eliminate or reduce crashes involving vehicles and wildlifeà[23 U.S.C. 133(b)(3)]; ÷àààààààProjects eligible under 23 U.S.C> 130 and installation of safety barriers and nets on bridges [23 U.S.C.à133(b)(5)]; ÷àààààààMaintenance and restoration of existing recreational trailsà[23 U.S.C. 133(b)(7)]; ÷àààààààInstallation of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure and vehicle-to-grid infrastructure [23 U.S.C.à133(b)(15)]; ÷àààààààInstallation and deployment of current and emerging intelligent transportation technologies [23 U.S.C.à133(b)(16)]; ÷àààààààPlanning and construction of projects that facilitate intermodal connections between emerging transportation technologies, such as magnetic levitation and hyperloop [23 U.S.C. 133(b)(17)]; |
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000090) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
| ÃÂ |
÷àààààààProtective features, including natural infrastructure, to enhance resilience of an eligible transportation facility [23 U.S.C. 133(b)(18)]; ÷àààààààMeasures to protect an eligible transportation facilityàfrom cybersecurity threats [23àU.S.C.(b)(19)]; ÷àààààààConducting value for money analyses or similar comparative analyses of public-private partnerships [ç 11508(d)(2); 23 U.S.C 133(b)(21)]. ÷ààààààà[Up to 5% of STBG apportionment] rural barge landing, docks, and waterfront infrastructure in a rural community or Alaska Native village that is off the road system [ç 11109(a)(7);à23 U.S.C. 113(b)(23) and (j)]; ÷àààààààProjects to enhance travel and tourism [23 U.S.C.à133(b)(24)]; ÷àààààààReplacement of low-water crossing with a bridge not on a Federal-aid highway [ç11109(a)(2)(D); 23 U.S.C.à133(c)4]; ÷àààààààCapital projects for the construction of a bus rapid transit corridor or dedicated bus lane [ç11130; 23 U.S.C.à142(a)(3)]; ÷ààààààà[Up to 15% of STBG apportionment] may be used onàotherwise STBG-eligible projects or maintenance activities on roads functionally classified as rural minor collectors or local roads, ice roads, or seasonal roads, may be transferred to the Appalachian Highway System Program or the Denali Access System Program [ç11109(a)(7); 23 U.S.C.à133(k)] |
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000090) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Transportation Enhancement projects, |
Activities previously authorized under the Transportation Enhancement Program: ÷àààààààPedestrianàandàbicycleàfacilities,àsafety,àandàeducational activities. ÷àààààààAcquisitionàofàscenicàeasementsàandàscenicàoràhistoric sites. ÷àààààààScenic or historic highwayàprograms, ÷àààààààLandscapingàandàotheràscenicàbeautificationàactivities, ÷àààààààHistoricàpreservation, ÷àààààààRehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, oràfacilities, ÷àààààààPreservationàofàabandonedàrailwayàcorridors, ÷àààààààAdvertising, ÷àààààààArchaeological planning andàresearch, ÷àààààààEnvironmentalàmitigationàtoàaddressàwateràpollutionàdueàto highway runoff or reduce vehicleÃĒâŽÂcaused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitatàconnectivity. ÷àààààààEstablishment of transportationàmuseums, Activities under the TennesseeàRoadscapesàgrant program, including landscaping, irrigation, benches, trash cans, paths, and signage. |
|
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) projects, |
Infrastructure related activities: ÷àààààààInfrastructure relatedàactivities: ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààSidewalkàimprovements ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààTrafficàcalmingàandàspeedàreductionàimprovements ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààPedestrian and bicycle crossingàimprovements ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààOnÃĒâŽÂstreet bicycleàfacilities ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààOffÃĒâŽÂstreetàbicycleàandàpedestrianàfacilities ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààSecure bicycle parkingàfacilities ÃĒâŽÂĒàààààààààTrafficàdiversionàimprovementsàapproximatelyàwithinà2àmiles of a schoolàlocation. ÷àààààààNonÃĒâŽÂinfrastructure relatedàactivities: ÷àààààààPublicàawarenessàcampaignsàandàoutreachàtoàpressàand communityàleaders. ÷àààààààTrafficàeducationàandàenforcementàinàtheàvicinityàof schools oààààStudentàsessionsàonàbicycleàandàpedestrianàsafety, health, andàenvironment oààààFunding for training, volunteers, and managers ofàsafe routes to schoolàprogram. |
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation Grouping (23000000090) (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààTransportationàAlternativesàprojects, ÷àààààààOnÃĒâŽÂàandàoffÃĒâŽÂroadàpedestrian and bicycleàfacilities, |
Activities previously authorized under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): ÷àààààààTransportation Alternatives projects, construction,àplanning, and design of onÃĒâŽÂroad and offÃĒâŽÂroad trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonÃĒâŽÂmotorized forms of transportation,àincluding: oààààSidewalkàimprovements. oààààBicycleàinfrastructure. oààààPedestrian and bicycleàsignals. oààààTraffic calmingàtechniques. oààààLighting and otheràsafetyÃĒâŽÂrelatedàinfrastructure. oààààTransportation projects to achieve complianceàwith the Americans with Disabilities Act ofà1990 |
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation ÃĒâŽâ TAP Grouping (23000000090) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààTransportationàAlternativesàprojects, ÷àààààààOnÃĒâŽÂàandàoffÃĒâŽÂroadàpedestrian and bicycleàfacilities, |
Activities previously authorized under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): ÷àààààààTransportation Alternatives projects, construction,àplanning, and design of onÃĒâŽÂroad and offÃĒâŽÂroad trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonÃĒâŽÂmotorized forms of transportation,àincluding: oààààSidewalkàimprovements. oààààBicycleàinfrastructure. oààààPedestrian and bicycleàsignals. oààààTraffic calmingàtechniques. oààààLighting and otheràsafetyÃĒâŽÂrelatedàinfrastructure. oààààTransportation projects to achieve complianceàwith the Americans with Disabilities Act ofà1990 |
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation ÃĒâŽâ TAP Grouping (23000000090) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààTransportationàAlternativesàprojects, |
÷àààààààConstruction, planning, and design of infrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated projectsàandàsystemsàthatàwillàprovideàsafeàroutesàforànonÃĒâŽÂdrivers, includingàchildren,àolderàadults,àandàindividualsàwithàdisabilitiesàto accessàdailyàneeds ÷àààààààConversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors foràtrails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonÃĒâŽÂmotorized transportationàusers ÷àààààààConstructionàofàturnouts,àoverlooks,àandàviewingàareas |
|
÷àààààààTransportationàAlternativesàprojects, |
Community improvement activities, which include but are not limited to: ÷àààààààInventory,àcontrol,àoràremovalàofàoutdooràadvertising. ÷àààààààHistoricàpreservationàandàrehabilitationàof historic transportationàfacilities. ÷àààààààVegetationàmanagementàinàtransportationàrightsÃĒâŽÂofÃĒâŽÂ way to improve roadway safety, prevents invasive species, and provides erosionàcontrol. ÷àààààààArchaeological activities relating to impacts from implementationàofàaàtransportationàprojectàeligibleàunder Title 23 of theàU.S.C. |
|
÷àààààààTransportationàAlternativesàprojects, |
Anyàenvironmentalàmitigationàactivity,àincludingàpollutionàprevention and pollution abatement activities and mitigationàto: ÷àààààààAddressàstormàwateràmanagement,àcontrol,àandàwater pollution prevention or abatement related toàhighway construction or due to highwayàrunoff. ÷àààààààReduce vehicleÃĒâŽÂcaused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquaticàhabitats. ÷àààààààActivities in furtherance of a vulnerable road user safety assessment [ [ç 11109(b)(1)(C); 23 U.S.C.à133(h)(3)(C). |
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation ÃĒâŽâ SRTS Grouping |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààProjects for the creation, rehabilitation, and maintenanceàof multiÃĒâŽÂuse recreationalàtrails. |
÷àààààààSRTS Program infrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated projects,ànonÃĒâŽÂ infrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated activities (such as pedestrian and bicycle safety and educational activities advanced under the SRTS program), and SRTS Coordinator positions. ÷àààààààPlanning, designing, oràconstructingàboulevards and other roadways largely inàthe rightÃĒâŽÂofÃĒâŽÂway of former Interstate System routes oràother dividedàhighways |
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation ÃĒâŽâ RTP Grouping (23000000090) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
÷àààààààRecreational Trail Programàprojects. |
Recreational Trails Program activities under 23 U.S.C. 206. ÷àààààààMaintenance and restoration of existing recreational trails ÷àààààààDevelopment and rehabilitation of trailside and trailhead facilities and trail linkages for recreationalàtrails ÷àààààààPurchase and lease of recreational trail construction and maintenanceàequipment ÷àààààààConstruction of new recreationalàtrails ÷àààààààAcquisitionàofàeasementsàandàfeeàsimpleàtitleàtoàpropertyàfor recreational trails or recreational trailàcorridors ÷àààààààAssessmentàofàtrailàconditionsàforàaccessibilityàand maintenance ÷àààààààDevelopment and dissemination of publications and operation of educational programs to promote safety and environmentalàprotection ÷àààààààPaymentàofàcostsàtoàtheàStateàincurredàinàadministering theàprogram ÷àààààààProjects authorized from this grouping may be authorized with different Federal percentages than shown in the grid based on one or more of theàfollowing: oàààà90%àforàcertainàInterstateàprojects underà23àU.S.C. 120(a);àor oàààà100% for certain safety items under 23 U.S.C. 120(c);àor oàààà100% for Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) projects under MAPÃĒâŽÂ21 ç1528àand 40 U.S.C.à14501. |
ÃÂ
|
Surface Transportation System Preservation and Operation ÃĒâŽÂ Workforce Development, Training, and Education Grouping (23000000082) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Surface transportation workforce development, training, and education activities. |
Direct educational expenses (not including salaries) in connection with the education and training of transportation employees ÷àààààààNationalàHighwayàInstituteà(NHI)àcourseàparticipation ÷àààààààCollege and University cooperative education programs relating to surface transportation including student internships, outreach to develop interest and promote participation in transportation careers, or activities that will help students prepare for a career inàtransportation ÷àààààààLocalàtechnicalàassistanceàprogramsà(LTAP) ÷àààààààProjects authorized from this grouping may be authorized with different Federal percentages than shown in the grid based on one or more of theàfollowing: oàààà90%àforàcertainàInterstateàprojects underà23àU.S.C. 120(a);àor oàààà100% for certain safety items under 23 U.S.C. 120(c);àor oàààà100% for Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) projects under MAPÃĒâŽÂ21 ç1528 and 40àU.S.C.14501. |
ÃÂ
ÃÂ
|
Carbon Reduction Program |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Funds for projects designed to reduce transportation emissions, defined as carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from on-road highway sources. |
AÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ a project described in 23 U.S.C. 149(b)(4) to establish or operate a traffic monitoring, management, and control facility or program, including advanced truck stop electrification systems. BÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ a public transportation project eligible for assistance underÃÂ 23 U.S.C. 142 (this includes eligible capital projects for the construction of a bus rapid transit corridor or dedicated bus lanes as provided for in BIL Section 11130 (23 U.S.C. 142(a)(3)); CÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ transportation alternatives project as described in 23ÃÂ U.S.C. 101(a)(29) as in effect prior to the enactment of the FAST Act,3 including the construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonmotorized forms ofÃÂ transportation; DÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ a project described in section 23 U.S.C. 503(c)(4)(E) for advanced transportation and congestion management technologies; |
ÃÂ
|
Carbon Reduction Program (ContÃĒ⎙d) |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
| ÃÂ |
Eàààààààààa project for the deployment of infrastructure-based intelligent transportation systems capital improvements and the installation of vehicle-to-infrastructure communications equipment, including retrofitting dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) technology deployed as part of an existing pilot program to cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) technology. Fàààààààààa project to replace street lighting and traffic control devices with energy-efficientàalternatives. Gààààààààdevelopment of a carbon reduction strategy (as described in the Carbon Reduction Strategies sectionàabove); Hààààààààa project or strategy designed to support congestion pricing, shifting transportation demand to nonpeak hours or other transportation modes, increasing vehicle occupancy rates, or otherwise reducing demand for roads, including electronic toll collection, and travel demand management strategies and programs. Iààààààààààefforts to reduce the environmental and community impacts of freight movement. Jààààààààààa project to support deployment of alternative fuel vehicles, includingÃĒâŽâ (i)ààààààthe acquisition, installation, or operation of publicly accessible electric vehicle charging infrastructure or hydrogen, natural gas, or propane vehicle fueling infrastructure;àand (ii)àààààthe purchase or lease of zero-emission construction equipment and vehicles, including the acquisition, construction, or leasing of required supportingàfacilities. Kàààààààààa project described under 23 U.S.C. 149(b)(8) for a diesel engine retrofit. Làààààààààcertain types of projects to improve traffic flow that are eligible under the CMAQ program, and that do not involve construction of new capacity; (23 U.S.C. 149(b)(5) and 175(c)(1)(L));àand Mààààààa project that reduces transportation emissions at port facilities, including through the advancement of port electrification |
ÃÂ
|
PROTECT Formula Program |
|
|
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
|
Help make surface transportation more resilient to natural hazards, including climate change, sea level rise, flooding, extreme weather events, and other natural disasters through support of planning activities, resilience improvements, community resilience and evacuation routes, and at-risk coastal infrastructure. |
AààààààààPlanning activities limited to developing a Resilience Improvement Plan; Resilience planning, predesign, design, or the development of data tools to simulate transportation disruption scenarios, including vulnerability assessments, technical capacity building to facilitate the ability of the State to assess the vulnerabilities of its surface transportation assets and community response strategies under current conditions and a range of potential future conditions; or evacuation planning and preparation [ç 11405; 23 U.S.C. 176(c)(2) and 176(d)(3)]; BààààààààResilience Improvements to improve the ability of an existing surface transportation asset to withstand one or more elements of a weather event or natural disaster, or to increase the resilience of surface transportation infrastructure from the impacts of changing conditions, such as sea level rise, flooding, wildfires, extreme weather events, and other natural disasters [ç 11405; 23 U.S.C.à176(d)(4)(A)]; CààààààààCommunity Resilience and Evacuation Route activities that strengthen and protect evacuation routes that are essential for providing and supporting evacuations caused by emergency events, including: resilience improvements if they will improve evacuation routes, and projects to ensure the ability of the evacuation route to provide safe passage during an evacuation and reduce the risk of damage to evacuation routes as a result of future emergency events [ç 11405,23 U.S.C. 176(d)(4)(B)];àor DààààààààAt-Risk Coastal Infrastructure activities to strengthen, stabilize, harden, elevate, relocate or otherwise enhance the resilience of highway and non-rail infrastructure, including: bridges, roads, pedestrian walkways, and bicycle lanes, and associated infrastructure, such as culverts and tide gates to protect highways that are subject to, or face increased long-term risks of, a weather event, a natural disaster, or changing conditions, including coastal flooding, coastal erosion, wave action, storm surge, or sea level rise, in order to improve transportation and public safety and to reduce costs by avoiding larger future maintenance or rebuilding costs. [ç 11405; 23àU.S.C. 176(d)(4)(C)] |
ÃÂ
Appendix D: Highway Funding Program Descriptions
ÃÂ
Highway Funding Program Descriptions
Federal Highway Administration Funds are allocated to the state in numerous categories. The major funding categories are described below:
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (BRR)ÃÂ This program provides funding for bridge replacement, or to rehabilitate aging or substandard bridges based on bridge sufficiency ratings. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. The FAST Act continues that precedent with the elimination of a standalone funding category for BRR. All projects previously authorized under the BRR Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the BRR Program.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ)ÃÂ The CMAQ program provides a flexible funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding is available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (non-attainment areas) and for former non-attainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas).
Funds may be used for transportation projects likely to contribute to the attainment or maintenance of a national ambient air quality standard, have a high level of effectiveness in reducing air pollution, and be included in the MPO’s current transportation plan and TIP or the current STIP in areas without an MPO. Currently, all non-attainment and maintenance areas in the state are located within an MPO area, meaning that air quality conformity must be demonstrated in the MPO long-range transportation plans.
Some specific eligible activities are described below:
- Establishment or operation of a traffic monitoring, management, and control facility, including advanced truck stop electrification systems, ifÃÂ ÃÂ it contributes to attainment of an air quality standard.
- Projects that improve traffic flow, including projects to improve signalization, construct HOV lanes, improve intersections, add turning lanes, improve transportation systems management and operations that mitigate congestion and improve air quality, and implement ITS solutions and other CMAQÃĒâŽÂeligible projects, including projects to improve incident and emergency response or improve mobility, such as realÃĒâŽÂtime traffic, transit, and multimodal traveler information.
- Purchase of integrated, interoperable emergency communications equipment.
- Projects that shift traffic demand to nonÃĒâŽÂpeak hours or other transportation modes, increase vehicle occupancy rates, or otherwise reduce demand.
- Purchase of diesel retrofits or conducts of related outreach activities.
- FacilitiesàservingàelectricàorànaturalàgasÃĒâŽÂfueledàvehiclesà(exceptàwhereàthisàconflictsàwith prohibitionààonààrestààareaààcommercialization)ààareààexplicitly eligible.
- Some expanded authority to use funds for transit operations.
- Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of CMAQ funds.
The time period for use of CMAQ funds is limited, specifically with the funds used for the operation of services and facilities. Previously, the operating assistance funds were allowable for use over a period of three years; however, those funds may now be used over the course of a five-year period in an effort to allow for an incremental reduction in assistance.
Demonstration Set Aside of the STP (DEMO)ÃÂ This program provides special funding for certain projects.
Enhancement Activity Set Aside of the STP (ENH)ÃÂ This program provides funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities; pedestrian and bicycle safety and educational activities; acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; scenic or historic highway programs; landscaping and other scenic beautification activities; historic preservation; rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities; preservation of abandoned railway corridors; control and removal of outdoor advertising; archaeological planning and research; environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; establishment of transportation museums. Under the TennesseeÃÂ RoadscapesÃÂ grant program, types of work will include landscaping, irrigation, benches, trash cans, paths, and signage. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the ENH Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the ENH Program.
Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)ÃÂ This program provides funds for projects on Federal Lands Access Transportation Facilities that are located on, adjacent to, or that provide access to Federal lands.
A Federal Lands access transportation facility is defined as a public highway, road, bridge, trail, or transit system that is located on, adjacent to, or provides access to Federal lands for which title or maintenance responsibility is vested in a State, county, town, township, tribal, municipal, or local government. Funds are distributed by formula among States that have Federal Lands managed by the National Park Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division is responsible for administering the FLAP and serving the transportation engineering needs of these Federal Land Management agencies in Tennessee. Eligible Activities include but are not limited to: Transportation planning, research, engineering, preventive maintenance, rehabilitation, restoration, construction, and reconstruction of Federal Lands located on or adjacent to, or that: provide access to a Federal land (adjacent vehicular parking areas; acquisition of necessary scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; provisions for pedestrians and bicycles; environmental mitigation in or adjacent to Federal land to improve public safety and reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; construction and reconstruction of roadside rest areas, including sanitary and water facilities); operation and maintenance of transit facilities.
Forest Highway/Public Lands (FH/PL)ÃÂ This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the Forest Highway Program and carry-over funds from SAFETEA-LU will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the Forest Highway Program.
High Priority Projects (HPP and HPP-L)ÃÂ This program provides designated funding to the state (HPP) and Local Agencies (HPP-L) for specific projects identified by Congress.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)àThe FAST Act continues the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads that focuses on performance. The FAST Act continues he overarching requirement that HSIP funds be used for safety projects that are consistent with the StateÃĒ⎙s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and that correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature or address a highway safety problem. Under MAP-21, the HSIP statute listed a range of eligible HSIP projects. However, the list was non-exhaustive, and a State could use HSIP funds on any safety project (infrastructure-related or non-infrastructure) that met the overarching requirement. In contrast, the FAST Act limits HSIP eligibility to only those listed in 23 USC ç 148ÃĒâŽâmost of which are infrastructure-safety related.
High Risk Rural Road (HRRR)ÃÂ A HRRR is any rural major or minor collector or a rural local road with significant safety risks, as defined by a State in accordance with an updated SHSP. This funding program was eliminated as a separate program under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the HRRR Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the HRRR Program.
Interstate Maintenance (IM)ÃÂ This program provides funding to rehabilitate, restore, and resurface the Interstate System.ÃÂ ÃÂ Reconstruction is also eligible if it does not add capacity, and High-Occupancy-Vehicle (HOV) lanes can be added. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the IM Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the IM Program.
National Highway Freight Program (NHFP)àThe FAST Act established a new National Highway Freight Program to improve the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) and support several goals. Generally, NHFP funds must contribute to the efficient movement of freight on the NHFN and be identified in a freight investment plan included in the StateÃĒ⎙s freight plan (required in FY 2018 and beyond). In addition, a State may use not more than 10% of its total NHFP apportionment each year for freight intermodal or freight rail projects. Eligible uses of program funds are as follows:
- Development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities.
- Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land relating to the project and improvements to land), construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements directly relating to improving system performance.
- Intelligent transportation systems and other technology to improve the flow of freight, including intelligent freight transportation systems.
- Efforts to reduce the environmental impacts of freight movement.
- Environmental and community mitigation for freight movement.
- RailwayÃĒâŽÂhighway grade separation.
- Geometric improvements to interchanges and ramps.
- TruckÃĒâŽÂonly lanes.
- Climbing and runaway truck lanes.
- Adding or widening of shoulders.
- Truck parking facilities eligible for funding under section 1401 (JasonÃĒ⎙s Law) of MAPÃĒâŽÂ21.
- RealÃĒâŽÂtime traffic, truck parking, roadway condition, and multimodal transportation information systems.
- Electronic screening and credentialing systems for vehicles, including weighÃĒâŽÂinÃĒâŽÂmotion truck inspection technologies.
- Traffic signal optimization, including synchronized and adaptive signals.
- Work zone management and information systems.
- Highway ramp metering.
- Electronic cargo and border security technologies that improve truck freight movement.
- Intelligent transportation systems that would increase truck freight efficiencies inside the boundaries of intermodal facilities.
- Additional road capacity to address highway freight bottlenecks.
- Physical separation of passenger vehicles from commercial motor freight.
- Enhancement of the resiliency of critical highway infrastructure, including highway infrastructure that supports national energy security, to improve the flow of freight.
- A highway or bridge project, other than a project described above, to improve the flow of freight on the NHFN.
- Any other surface transportation project to improve the flow of freight into and out of an eligible intermodal freight facility.
- Diesel retrofit or alternative fuel projects under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement program (CMAQ) for class 8 vehicles.
- Conducting analyses and data collection related to the NHFP, developing and updating freight performance targets to carry out section 167 of title 23, and reporting to the Administrator to comply with the freight performance target under section 150 of title 23.
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)ÃÂ The FAST Act continues the NHPP, which provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State’s asset management plan for the NHS.
NHPP projects must be on an eligible facility and support progress toward achievement of national performance goals for improving infrastructure condition, safety, mobility, or freight movement on the NHS, and be consistent with Metropolitan and Statewide planning requirements. Eligible activities include:
- Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, preservation, or operational improvements of NHS segments.
- Construction,ÃÂ replacementÃÂ (includingÃÂ replacementÃÂ withÃÂ fillÃÂ material),ÃÂ rehabilitation, preservation,ÃÂ ÃÂ andÃÂ ÃÂ protectionÃÂ ÃÂ (includingÃÂ ÃÂ scourÃÂ ÃÂ countermeasures, seismic retrofits, impact protection measures, security countermeasures, and protection against extreme events) of NHS bridges and tunnels.
- Bridge and tunnel inspection and evaluation on the NHS and inspection and evaluation of other NHS highway infrastructure assets.
- Training of bridge and tunnel inspectors.
- Construction, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing ferry boats and facilities, including approaches that connect road segments of the NHS.
- Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, and preservation of, and operational improvements for, a FederalÃĒâŽÂaid highway not on the NHS, and construction of a transit project eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, if the project is in the same corridor and in proximity to a fully accessÃĒâŽÂcontrolled NHS route, if the improvement is more costÃĒâŽÂeffective (as determined by a benefitÃĒâŽÂcost analysis) than an NHS improvement, and will reduce delays or produce travel time savings on the NHS route and improve regional traffic flow.
- Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways.
- Highway safety improvements on the NHS.
- Capital and operating costs for traffic and traveler information, monitoring, management, and control facilities and programs.
- Development and implementation of a State Asset Management Plan for the NHS including data collection, maintenance and integration, software costs, and equipment costs.
- InfrastructureÃĒâŽÂbased ITS capital improvements.
- Environmental restoration and pollution abatement.
- Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species.
- Environmental mitigation related to NHPP projects.
- Construction of publicly owned intracity or intercity bus terminals servicing the NHS.
- Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of NHPP funds.
- Installation of vehicleÃĒâŽÂtoÃĒâŽÂinfrastructure communication equipment.
- Reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, or preservation of a bridge on a nonÃĒâŽÂNHS FederalÃĒâŽÂaid highway (if Interstate System and NHS Bridge Condition provision requirements are satisfied).
- A project to reduce the risk of failure of critical NHS infrastructure (defined to mean a facility, the incapacity or failure of which would have a debilitating impact in certain specified areas).
- At a State’s request, the U.S. DOT may use the State’s STBG funding to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an eligible NHPP project or group of projects.
National Highway System (NHS)ÃÂ This Program provides funding for major roads including the Interstate System, a large percentage of urban and rural principal arterials, the Strategic Defense Highway Network (STRAHNET), and strategic highway connectors. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the NHS Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the NHS Program.
National Scenic Byways Program (NSBP)ÃÂ This Program provides funding for roads having outstanding scenic, historic, cultural, natural, recreational, and archaeological qualities and provides for designation of these roads as National Scenic Byways, All-American Roads or America’s Byways. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the NSBP Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the NSBP Program.
Recreational Trails (RTP)ÃÂ This program provides funding for the creation, rehabilitation and maintenance of multi-use recreational trails. The FAST Act eliminated the RTP in lieu of replacing it and other programs with a set-aside of STBG funding for transportation alternatives. All projects previously authorized under the RTP and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the RTP.
Repurposed Funds (R)àThis acronym does not represent a specific funding program, but rather the re-designation of funds. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 allows States to repurpose certain funds originally earmarked for specific projects more than 10 years ago. The limitations in the provision are to ensure the projects are obligated promptly and used in the same geographic area as the original earmark to provide funding for other needed projects eligible under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program. In this STIP, repurposed earmark funds are designated with ÃĒâŽËR-ÃĒâŽËpreceding the funding code.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)ÃÂ This program provides funding for empowering communities to make walking and bicycling to school a safe and routine activity. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21, with eligibilities initially carried forward under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). Under the FAST Act, SRTS activities are carried forward under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) . All projects previously authorized under the SRTS Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the SRTS Program.
Section 154ÃÂ This Program provides funding to help save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce economic costs due to road traffic crashes, through education, research, safety standards, and enforcement activity.
State (STA)ÃÂ This program provides 100% state funding by the state for various projects on the State Highway System.
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG)ÃÂ The FAST Act converted the long-standing Surface Transportation Program into the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). The new STBG Program provides flexible funding that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals. Eligible activities include, but are not limited to:
- Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, preservation, or operational improvements for highways, including designated routes of the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) and local access roads under 40 USC 14501.
- Replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, and antiÃĒâŽÂicing/deicing for bridges and tunnels on any public road, including construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other modes.
- Construction of new bridges and tunnels on a FederalÃĒâŽÂaid highway.
- Inspection and evaluation of bridges, tunnels and other highway assets as well as training for bridge and tunnel inspectors.
- Capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, including vehicles and facilities used to provide intercity passenger bus service.
- Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, including electric and natural gas vehicle charging infrastructure, bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways, and ADA sidewalk modification.
- Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs, installation of safety barriers and nets on bridges, hazard eliminations, mitigation of hazards caused by wildlife, railwayÃĒâŽÂhighway grade crossings.
- Highway and transit research, development, technology transfer.
- Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management and control facilities and programs, including advanced truck stop electrification.
- Surface transportation planning.
- Transportation alternatives ÃĒâŽÂ newly defined with setÃĒâŽÂaside, includes most transportation enhancement eligibilities.
- Transportation control measures.
- Development and establishment of management systems.
- Environmental mitigation efforts (as under National Highway Performance Program).
- Intersections with high accident rates or levels of congestion.
- InfrastructureÃĒâŽÂbased ITS capital improvements.
- Environmental restoration and pollution abatement.
- Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species.
- Congestion pricing projects and strategies, including electric toll collection and travel demand management strategies and programs.
- Recreational trails projects.
- Construction of ferry boats and terminals.
- Border infrastructure projects.
- Truck parking facilities.
- Development and implementation of State asset management plan for the NHS, and similar activities related to the development and implementation of a performance based management program for other public roads.
- Surface transportation infrastructure modifications within port terminal boundaries, only if necessary to facilitate direct intermodal interchange, transfer, and access into and out of the port.
- Construction and operational improvements for a minor collector in the same corridor and in proximity to an NHS route if the improvement is more costÃĒâŽÂ effective (as determined by a benefitÃĒâŽÂcost analysis) than an NHS improvement and will enhance NHS level of service and regional traffic flow.
- Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of STBG funds.
- Create and operate a State office to help design, implement, and oversee publicÃĒâŽÂprivate partnerships (P3) eligible to receive Federal highway or transit funding, and to pay a stipend to unsuccessful P3 bidders in certain circumstances.
- At a StateÃĒ⎙s request, the U.S. DOT may use the StateÃĒ⎙s STBG funding to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an eligible STBG project or group of projects.
Similar to the past STP funding, STBG projects may not be on local or rural minor collectors. However, there are a number of exceptions to this requirement. A State may use up to 15% of its rural sub allocation on minor collectors. Other exceptions include: bridge and tunnel projects; safety projects; fringe and corridor parking facilities/programs; recreational trails, pedestrian and bicycle projects, and safe routes to school projects; boulevard/roadway projects largely in the right-of-way of divided highways; inspection/evaluation of bridges, tunnels, and other highway assets; port terminal modifications; and projects within the pre-FAST Act title 23 definition of ÃĒâŽÅtransportation alternativesÃĒâŽÂ.ÃÂ
The FAST Act continues the MAP-21 set-aside of a share of each StateÃĒ⎙s STBG apportionment for use on bridges not on Federal-aid highways (ÃĒâŽÅoff-system bridgesÃĒâŽÂ). The amount is to be not less than 15% of the StateÃĒ⎙s FY 2009 Highway Bridge Program apportionment. The Secretary, after consultation with State and local officials, may reduce a StateÃĒ⎙s set-aside requirement if the State has insufficient off-system bridge needs. For wholly State/locally funded projects to replace or rehabilitate deficient off-system bridges, any amounts spent that are in excess of 20% of project costs may be credited to the non-Federal share of eligible bridge projects in the State.ÃÂ
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP)ÃÂ The FAST Act eliminated the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) and replaced it with a set-aside of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for transportation alternatives. These set-aside funds include all projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP, encompassing a variety of smaller-scale transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental mitigation related to storm water and habitat connectivity.
Generally, transportation alternatives eligibilities are the same as those under the prior TAP and consist of:
- Transportation Alternatives as defined in 23 USC 101(a)(29) (MAPÃĒâŽÂ21 1103):
oààààààààààààConstruction, planning, and design of onÃĒâŽÂroad and offÃĒâŽÂroad trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other nonÃĒâŽÂmotorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safetyÃĒâŽÂ related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
oààààààààààààConstruction, planning, and design of infrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated projects and systems that will provide safe routes for nonÃĒâŽÂdrivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs.
oààààààààààààConversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other nonÃĒâŽÂmotorized transportation users.
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas.
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Community improvement activities, including;
Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising;
Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities;
Vegetation management practices in transportation rightsÃĒâŽÂofÃĒâŽÂway to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control; and
Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of transportation project eligible under title 23.
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Any environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and pollution abatement activities and mitigation to;
Address storm water management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff, including activities described in sections 133(b)(11), 328(a), and 329 of title 23; or
Reduce vehicleÃĒâŽÂcaused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats.
- The Recreational Trails Program under Section 206 of Title 23.
- The Safe Routes to School Program under section 1404 of the SAFETEAÃĒâŽÂLU.
oààààààààààààInfrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated projects ÃĒâŽÂplanning, design, and construction of infrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated projects on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements, traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, onÃĒâŽÂstreet bicycle facilities, offÃĒâŽÂstreet bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools.
oààààààààààààNonÃĒâŽÂinfrastructureÃĒâŽÂrelated activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs.
oÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ ÃÂ Safe Routes to School coordinator.
- Planning, designing, or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the rightÃĒâŽÂofÃĒâŽÂway of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways.
- Ineligible Activities: Section 1103 of MAPÃĒâŽÂ21 eliminated the definition of transportation enhancement activities in section 104 of title 23 and inserted in its place a definition of transportation alternatives, which does not include eligibility for certain activities that were previously eligible as transportation enhancements:
- Safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicycles.
- Exception: Activities targeting children in Kindergarten through 8th grade are eligible under SRTS (an eligible activity under TAP funding).
Note: Some of these activities may be eligible under HSIP. NonÃĒâŽÂconstruction projects for bicycle safety remain broadly eligible for STBG funds.
- Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites.
- Scenic or historic highway programs (including visitor and welcome centers).
Note: A few specific activities under this category (construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas) remain eligible under Section 101(a)(29)(D) of title 23.
- Historic preservation as an independent activity unrelated to historic transportation facilities. Note: Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities are permitted as one type of community improvement activity; see Section 101(a)(29)(E).
- Operation of historic transportation facilities.
- Archaeological planning and research undertaken for proactive planning. This category now must be used only as mitigation for highway projects.
- Transportation museums.
The FAST Act allows an urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 to use up to 50% of its sub-allocated TA funds for any STBG-eligible purpose (but still subject to the TA-wide requirement for competitive selection of projects). Additionally, it eliminated TAPÃĒ⎙s ÃĒâŽÅFlexibility of Excess Reserved FundingÃĒâŽÂ provision, which allowed the use of excess TAP funds for any TAP-eligible activity or for projects eligible under the CMAQ Program.
[1]ÃÂ The baseline is based on preliminary figures from early 2022. FHWA will determine the final figures in early 2023.
[2]ÃÂ The five-year rolling average is calculated by adding the number of fatalities for the consecutive five-year period, dividing by five, and rounding to the tenth decimal place.
[3]àVMT ÃĒâŽâ Vehicle Miles Traveled