Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization (MTPO)
Fiscal Years
2020-2023 Transportation Improvement Program
Adopted December 20,
2019
Amended December 8,
2020, April 27, 2021, December 8, 2021
and June 21, 2022
This Fiscal Years (FYs)
2020 – 2023 Transportation Improvement Program was developed by the Johnson
City MTPO, in cooperation with:
U.S. Department of
Transportation
Federal Highway
Administration
Federal Transit
Administration
Tennessee Department
of Transportation
An electronic copy of
this document can be found on our website at https://jcmpo.org/tip.html.
If you need this document translated into Spanish or another language, or need a paper copy, please contact the MTPO Transportation Planning Coordinator, by phone at (423) 434-6272 or email at jcmpo@jcmpo.org.
Spanish Translation of the above statement:
Si usted necesita este document resumido en espanol contacta por favor al Coordinator del MTPO , numero de telefono (423) 434-6272, correo electronico jcmpo@jcmpo.org.
The Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation
Planning Organization ensures compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964; 49 CFR, part 26; related statutes and regulations to the end that no
person shall be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of, or
be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal
financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Transportation on the grounds
of race, color, or national origin.
Table
of Contents
Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process
Certification
Amendment 1 Self-Certification Resolution
Amendment 1 Approval Resolution
Amendments 2 and 3 Self-Certification Resolution
Amendment 2 Approval Resolution
Amendment 3 Approval Resolution
Amendments 4 and 5 Self-Certifications
Amendment 4 Approval Resolution
Amendment 5 Approval Resolution
1.1 About the Johnson City MTPO
1.2 Metropolitan Planning Area
2.5 National Transportation Goals
3.1 Coordination and Consultation Process
3.2 Title VI / Environmental Justice
3.4 Public Transportation Program of Projects
3.5 Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
4.4 Ongoing Maintenance and Operations Cost
5 TIP Amendment and Modification Procedures
5.3 Administrative Modifications
6 Status of Projects in FYs 2017-2020 TIP
7 Projects to Carryover from FYs 2017-2020 TIP to FYs
2020-2023 TIP
9 Performance Measures and Targets
9.1 What is Performance-Based Planning and Programming?
9.2 Transportation National Goals with Performance
Measures and Targets
9.3 Transit National Goals with Performance Measures and
Targets
9.4 Linking Performance Measures and Targets to Project
Selection from the MTP to the TIP
10 Individual Project Sheets for the FYs 2020 – 2023 TIP
Section A:
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program – MPO Projects (STBG-M)
2014-01 Elk Avenue Bridge Repair
2017-01 SR 67/91/US 321 at SR 37/US 19E Traffic Signal
Upgrade
2017-02 SR 34 at Industrial Park Rd Traffic Signal
2017-16 Traffic Signal for SR 34/US 11E (E Jackson Blvd)
& Tiger Way
2017-21 Elizabethton ADA Transition Plan
2022-01 Downtown Johnson City Crosswalk Safety Project
2022-02 Johnson City Traffic Signal Grouping
Section B: Surface Transportation Block Grant Program
– State Projects (STBG-S)
2010010 State Route (SR) 91 Extension
2090015 SR-XXX (Knob Creek Rd)
2090594 Traffic Signal for State of Franklin Rd and Harris
Drive
2090565 Surface Transportation Program Grouping
Section C: Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
Section D: National Highway Performance Program
(NHPP)
2090560 National Highway System Infrastructure Grouping
Section E: Transit Projects (FTA)
2020-01 JCT Transit Operating – Sec. 5307
2020-02 JCT Capital – Sec. 5307
2020-03 JCT Capital – Sec. 5307 & 5339
2020-04 JCT Operating – Sec. 5317 New Freedom
2020-05 JCT Operating – Sec. 5316 Job Access
2020-06 JCT Capital – Sec. 5310
2020-07 NET Trans Operating Expenses
2020-08 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with
Disabilities Program Grouping.
2020-10 NET Trans Capital Project
2022-03 NET Trans Capital Project (5307)
Section F:
Transportation Alternatives
2020-09 Transportation Alternatives Program Grouping
Section G: Financial Summary Tables
Financial
Summary of Highway Funds
Financial
Summary of STBG-M Funds
Financial
Summary of Transit Funds
Appendix A:
Public Participation Documentation
Appendix B: Memorandum of Agreement
Appendix C:
Statewide Grouping Descriptions
Appendix D: Highway Funding Program Descriptions
In
accordance with 23 CFR 450.336, the Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation
Planning Organization and the Tennessee Department of Transportation hereby
certify that the metropolitan transportation planning process is addressing
major issues facing the Johnson City, TN urbanized area, and is being carried
out in accordance with the following requirements:
I.
23
U.S.C. 134 and 135, 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304 (Highways and Transit).
II. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000 d-1) and 49 CFR part 21.
III. 49 U.S.C. 5332, prohibiting discrimination
on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin, sex, or age in employment
or business opportunity.
IV. Section 1101 (b) of the FAST-ACT (Pub. L
114-357) and 49 CFR part 26 regarding the involvement of disadvantaged business
enterprises in USDOT-funded projects.
V. 23 CFR part 230, regarding the
implementation of an equal employment opportunity program on Federal and
Federal-aid highway construction contracts.
VI. Provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq) and 49 CFR parts 27, 37, and
38.
VII. In nonattainment and maintenance areas, sections 174
and 176 (c) and (d) of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7504, 7506 (c)
and (d), and 40 CFR part 93.
VIII.
The Older
Americans Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101), prohibiting discrimination on the
basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance.
IX. Section
324 of Title 23 U.S.C. regarding the prohibition of discrimination based on
gender.
X. Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and 49 CFR part 27
regarding discrimination against individuals with disabilities.
Signature: ________________________________ Date: ________________________
Jenny Brock
Chair, Johnson City MTPO Executive Board
__________________________________________ Date: _________________________
Ronnie Porter
Director, TDOT Program Development &
Administration Division
A RESOLUTION OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF THE JOHNSON CITY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MTPO)
To Approve and Adopt
the Fiscal Years 2020 – 2023 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
WHEREAS, the Johnson City MTPO is responsible for carrying out a comprehensive, cooperative, and continuing transportation planning process throughout portions of Carter, Sullivan and Washington Counties; and
WHEREAS, the FAST Act requires that each MPO adopt a four-year work program that consists of a program of transportation projects to be advanced during the program period; and
WHEREAS, the TIP is comprised of projects that are derived from the MTPO’s adopted 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan, which serves as a guide for the development of the TIP; and
WHEREAS, the Johnson City
MTPO Executive Board determines the use of various Federal Highway
Administration funds, including Surface Transportation Block Grant Program, National
Highway Performance Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program, Federal
Transit Administration programs, and other federal transportation funds that
are made available for Johnson City MTPO area projects, as listed in the TIP;
and
WHEREAS, no Johnson City
MTPO area highway or transit projects are eligible for Federal funds until they
are programmed into the TIP; and
WHEREAS, the Johnson City
MTPO has involved the public and interested stakeholders as detailed by the
Public Participation Plan, which includes a public review and comment period of
no less than fourteen (14) calendar days and a formal public hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,
that the Executive Board of the Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation
Planning Organization hereby approves and adopts the Johnson City MTPO Fiscal
Years 2020 – 2023 TIP.
MTPO Executive Board, Chair Date
MTPO Executive Staff, Chair Date
AC Advanced Construction
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
ACQ Acquisition of vehicles or equipment
ACNHPP Advance Construction National Highway Performance Program
CAP Capital Expenditure
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program
CONST Construction
E+C Existing plus Committed
ENH Transportation Enhancements
ER Emergency Relief Program
FAST Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FLAP Federal Lands Access Program
FLTP Federal Lands Transportation Program
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FFY Federal Fiscal Year
HIP-CRRSAA Highway Infrastructure Programs - Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
IA Improving Manufacturing Public Roads and Opportunities for a Vibrant Economy (IMPROVE) Act
ITS Intelligent Transportation System
JC Johnson City
JCT Johnson City Transit System
MAINT Maintenance
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
MOA Memorandum of Agreement
MPA Metropolitan Planning Area
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan
MTPO Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization
NEPA National Environment Policy Act
NET Trans Northeast Tennessee Rural Public Transit
NHFP National Highway Freight Program
NHPP National Highway Performance Program
NHS National Highway System
OP Operating Expenditure
PE-N Preliminary Engineering (NEPA)
PE-D Preliminary Engineering (Design)
PHSIP Penalty Highway Safety Improvement Program
PM Performance Measures
POP Program of Projects
PPP Public Participation Plan
ROW Right of Way
RTP Recreational Trails Program
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SR State Route
STBG-M Surface Transportation Block Grant Program – MPO
STBG-S Surface Transportation Block Grant Program – State
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
STP Surface Transportation Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives Program
TERM Transit Economic Requirements Model
TDOT Tennessee Department of Transportation
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TR Training
U.S.C. United States Code
YOE Year of Expenditure
The Johnson City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization (MTPO) was established in 1982 when the 1980 Census identified the Johnson City Urbanized Area (urban areas with a population of at least 50,000). Federal law requires the Johnson City MTPO to conduct transportation planning activities within the Johnson City Urbanized Area in a continuous, cooperative, and comprehensive process, as defined in the following federal legislation and regulations:
· Current Transportation Authorization – Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act;
· Past Transportation Authorization – Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act;
· Metropolitan Transportation Planning – Title 23 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Section 134;
· Formula Grant Program for Metropolitan Planning – Title 49 of the U.S.C., Section 5303;
· Metropolitan Transportation Planning and Programming – Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 450; and
· Metropolitan
Transportation Planning and Programming –Title 49 of the CFR, Section 613,
Subpart A.
Under
current federal law, at a minimum, any urbanized area with a population over
50,000 must be in a Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) for a Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO). The MPA is a boundary around the urbanized area
that identifies additional areas that are expected to become urbanized within
the next twenty (20) years. The Johnson
City MTPO MPA consists of the Town of Bluff City, the City of Elizabethton, the
City of Johnson City, the Town of Jonesborough, a portion of the Town of
Unicoi, and parts of Carter, Sullivan and Washington Counties. The map in Figure 1 on the next page shows the Johnson City MTPO Urbanized
Area, as well as the MPA boundaries.
The current
boundary was adopted by the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board at its meeting on
October 9, 2014 and approved by the Governor of the State of Tennessee on
December 17, 2014.
Figure
1
The Johnson City MTPO is comprised of an Executive Board, an Executive Staff (technical committee) and administrative staff. The Executive Board is the overall governing body for the Johnson City MTPO and is supported by the Executive Staff and the Johnson City MTPO administrative staff. The administrative staff of the Johnson City MTPO is housed as a division of the Development Services Department of the City of Johnson City. As required by federal law, the Johnson City MTPO is responsible for coordinating transportation planning activities for all its member jurisdictions. Figure 2 on page 12 shows the Organizational Structure of the Johnson City MTPO.
Figure 2
Johnson City MTPO Organizational Chart
As part of the metropolitan planning requirements, the Johnson City MTPO develops and regularly updates a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The purpose of the TIP is to identify and program all transportation projects within the Johnson City MPA that are funded by federal programs in Titles 23 (Highways) and 49 (Transportation) of the U.S.C. The TIP is cooperatively developed at least every four (4) years by the Johnson City MTPO administrative staff in conjunction with its member jurisdictions, Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and providers of public transportation. The TIP is included by reference in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and adopted by the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board and the Governor of the State of Tennessee. The TIP contains all federally funded and regionally significant locally funded projects, of which no regionally significant locally funded projects are currently planned. The TIP includes proposed federally funded capital and non-capital surface transportation projects or project phases.
Once a draft TIP is completed, it is submitted to TDOT, FHWA, and FTA for comments. Once the comments have been adequately addressed, the TIP follows the process in the Public Participation Plan (as described in page 16) to provide public notice and an opportunity for the public to comment. Once any public comments are addressed, the TIP is recommended for adoption by the Johnson City MTPO Executive Board. Then, the final TIP is forwarded to TDOT to be included by reference in the STIP and approved by FHWA and FTA.
The projects that can be included in the TIP range from new construction and capital improvements for highway, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, intercity transportation, to operational and safety improvements. Consideration is also given to operational strategies from the Johnson City MTPO Regional Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Architecture, the Johnson City Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plans, TDOT’s Three Year Work Program and 25-Year Long-Range Transportation Policy Plan, the Johnson City Unified Planning Work Program, and the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) for Tennessee. Also considered are subarea and corridor studies, such as the Washington County Thoroughfare Plan.
All projects in the TIP are derived from the Johnson City MTPO 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), which is a plan that is required to cover at least a twenty (20) year timeframe of planning for projects in the future. TIP projects include either the MTP (Regional Plan ID) Project Number or state the project is consistent with the overall objectives with the MTP. The 2045 MTP was adopted on February 22, 2018. At a minimum, the TIP is required to cover at least a four (4) year horizon. This TIP covers the federal fiscal years (FFYs) period of October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2023. The previous TIP covered the FFYs period of October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2020 and was adopted on November 4, 2016. The next TIP will cover the FFYs period of October 1, 2022 to September 30, 2026, and the development cycle will begin in early 2022.
The Johnson City MTPO considered many factors important to the area during its project selection process, which are the same as the previous TIP. Those factors are shown in Table 1 on the next page. Projects that are submitted by local jurisdictions are scored according to the factors for inclusion in the TIP. More detail on the project selection process is provided in Section 9.4 on page 41. A call for projects was issued during the Executive Board meeting on November 14, 2018; however, no new highway projects were submitted. Staff consulted with local jurisdictions and TDOT to determine the status of projects in the current TIP. Staff also reviewed available funding and the capacity of the local governments to provide the required match to the federal funds for carryover projects. A draft list of the carryover projects were presented to the Executive Board and Executive Staff on August 28, 2019. The final TIP will then be formally presented to the Executive Board, which has the responsibility as the governing policy board to adopt the TIP. Projects in the first year of the TIP constitute an agreed to list of projects for inclusion in the TIP.
The
TIP is just one part of a project’s journey through the planning and approval process. Projects in the TIP must first appear in the
2045 MTP, which was adopted on February 22, 2018. One project can have many phases –
preliminary engineering, environmental process, design, right-of-way purchase,
and finally, construction. It can take
many years for one project to complete all phases and be ready for construction,
so not all phases may be included in this TIP.
In order to add a project phase to the TIP, funding must be identified
and be readily expected to be available in order to ensure the TIP remains
fiscally constrained. Table 2 on page 15 lists the types of
project phases found in the TIP and a brief description, along with a Glossary
in Appendix D that provides in-depth descriptions.
Table 1
TIP
Project Selection Criteria |
|
Criteria |
Points Available |
CONSISTENCY WITH PLANS |
|
In previous TIP or related project in TIP |
15 |
Consistent with growth plan/land
use/ ITS Architecture plans |
8 |
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT |
|
Reduces/manages congestion in
travel demand model |
8 |
Improves traffic operations |
10 |
Transit capital improvement |
2 |
Alternative mode (bike, pedestrian, and other modes) |
5 |
ITS project |
2 |
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION |
|
Improves access to major highways |
5 |
Provides/enhances connection between modes |
4 |
Enhances connectivity of street
network |
14 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT |
|
Improves facility for freight
movement (air, rail, distribution) |
2 |
Enhances economic development investments |
10 |
AIR QUALITY |
|
Promotes positive affect on air quality |
2 |
SAFETY MANAGEMENT |
|
Promotes/improves safety |
7 |
VALUE ADDED |
|
Local Match greater than minimum required |
2 |
Right of Way (ROW) was donated,
engineering already complete, etc. |
4 |
TOTAL |
100 |
Advanced Construction (AC) is a technique which allows a State to initiate a project using non-federal funds while preserving eligibility for future Federal-Aid funds. Eligibility means that FHWA has determined that the project technically qualifies for Federal-Aid; however, no present or future federal funds are committed to the project. After an AC project is authorized, the state may convert the project to regular Federal-Aid funding provided Federal funds are made available for the project.
An AC project must meet the same requirements and be processed in the same manner as a regular Federal-Aid project. All phases of a project must meet federal requirements for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (Uniform Act), etc., when any phase is implemented with Federal-Aid funds.
Table 2
Types
of Project Phases |
||
Project Phase |
Acronym |
Description |
Acquisition/Purchase |
ACQ |
Procuring equipment, software, or vehicles |
Capital |
CAP |
Capital Expenditures, including capitalized preventive maintenance on revenue vehicles |
Construction |
CONST |
Work by the agency or contractor(s) to construct the project, possibly including utility relocation |
Maintenance |
MAINT |
Activities to maintain the transportation/transit system |
Operations |
OP |
Operating the transportation system such as incurring costs related to the day-to-day operations or maintenance of transit vehicle systems, traffic signal systems, or intelligent transportation systems |
Preliminary
Engineering - NEPA |
PE-N |
Includes activities from the inception of the project, fulfilling the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and all applicable legislation, regulations, executive orders, and directives, up to the approval of the environmental document |
Preliminary Engineering - Design |
PE-D |
Preliminary engineering design work, in which general project location and design concepts are determined |
Right-of-Way |
ROW |
Work from the distribution of ROW plans up to advertising for bids or commencement of work by the Agency, dealing with real property acquisition, temporary and permanent easements, and utility relocation |
Title 23 of the U.S.C., Section 150(b) lists a set of seven (7) national transportation goals for the federal-aid highway system:
(1) Safety – To achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads.
(2) Infrastructure condition – To maintain the highway infrastructure asset system in a state of good repair.
(3) Congestion reduction – To achieve a significant reduction in congestion on the National Highway System.
(4) System reliability – To improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system.
(5) Freight movement and economic vitality – To improve the National Highway Freight Network, strengthen the ability of rural communities to access national and international trade markets, and support regional economic development.
(6) Environmental sustainability – To enhance the performance of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural environment.
(7) Reduced project delivery delays – To reduce project costs, promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving agencies' work practices.
In addition to project selection criteria, the Johnson City MTPO also considered the ten (10) planning factors identified in the current transportation authorizing legislation, FAST Act, which requires MPOs to focus efforts on regional strategies that:
(1) Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
(2) Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
(3) Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users;
(4) Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight;
(5) Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns;
(6) Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system across and between modes, for people and freight;
(7) Promote efficient system management and operation;
(8) Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system;
(9) Improve the resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surface transportation; and
(10) Enhance travel and tourism.
The Johnson City MTPO Public Participation Plan (PPP) provides guidelines for how the public and interested stakeholders will be involved in the development of the TIP. Throughout the development of the MTP and the TIP, the public and interested stakeholders are given an opportunity to comment. The full document is available on the website at https://jcmpo.org/ppp.html.
Throughout the development of the MTP, significant public input was gathered from online surveys and public meetings with local civic groups and economic round tables. In addition to this, the MTP was made available for thirty (30) calendar days for the public to comment. All projects in the TIP must either be in the MTP or consistent with the MTP, thus the public has already been made aware of planned projects and has been provided with the opportunity to comment.
To build on this process, the TIP process includes additional opportunities for the public to be involved. Following the process outlined in the PPP, the draft TIP is available to the public for review and comment for fourteen (14) calendar days from the date of the public notice in the regional newspaper, the Johnson City Press. The notices and document are made available on the Johnson City MTPO website and posted on the Twitter account @JohnsonCityMTPO and Facebook account @JohnsonCityMPO. During this review period, a public hearing is held to present the TIP to the public and provide an opportunity for comments. All public participation documentation and comments are compiled for inclusion in Appendix A of the TIP document and presented to the Executive Board. If there are significant comments, the Executive Board may choose to postpone the adoption of the TIP until such time these comments can be addressed. If the TIP document changes significantly, the Executive Board may decide to request an additional review period to afford the public the opportunity to comment on the revisions.
As part of the “Consultation Process” required by Section 450.316 of the CFR, the Johnson City MTPO has established contact with federal and state agencies. Formal coordination with these agencies will help to identify effective mitigation strategies for potential impacts of projects included in the Johnson City MTPO’s MTP and TIP. The Johnson City MTPO public participation processes shall be coordinated with the statewide transportation public involvement process through review and communication wherever possible. The Johnson City MTPO Interagency Consultation List is available as Appendix C in the PPP. A checklist from the PPP for adoption of the TIP is shown as Table 3 below.
Table 3
Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) Checklist |
|
Activity |
Technique(s) |
Draft Document |
Available online at www.jcmpo.org and at the Johnson City MTPO office. |
Comment
Opportunities |
|
Public Notice & Comment Period |
14 Calendar Days, beginning with public notice in a regional newspaper and on the Johnson City MTPO website at www.jcmpo.org, and on Twitter. |
Public Hearing |
Public hearing will
be held during the public comment period. |
Public Meeting/Hearing Notice |
Published a minimum of seven (7) calendar days prior to the public meeting/hearing in the Johnson City Press, on the website and on Twitter. |
Amendment Notice |
Amendments to the TIP will follow the same public review process and procedures as that of TIP adoption. |
Summary of comments received |
A public comment summary will be made available to members of the Executive Board prior to the meeting for the TIP adoption/amendment. Written and verbal comments are summarized and incorporated into the final document. If significant changes are made after addressing the comments, additional opportunity for public comment will be provided. |
Final, adopted
document availability |
The final, adopted TIP document will be available on the Johnson City MTPO website and at the administrative office. |
As with
all processes and projects in the Johnson City MTPO, Title VI, Environmental
Justice, and the ADA are a priority.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based
upon race, color, or national origin.
Specifically, Title 42 of the U.S.C., Section 2000d states, “No person
in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin,
be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected
to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial
assistance.” Environmental Justice,
Executive Order 12898 of 1994 states, “Each Federal agency shall make achieving
environmental justice part of its mission by identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and
low-income populations.” In addition to
the Executive Order, the US DOT issued Order 5610.2(a), which provides
directive about how Environmental Justice communities are to be addressed in
the planning process.
All
projects using federal highway trust funds for the Johnson City MTPO comply
with Title VI and Environmental Justice.
Figure 3 below displays the census block groups in the four-county
region according to their percent of minority population compared to a
threshold of 9.3 percent for the Johnson City Urbanized Area, along with the
TIP project locations, which increase safety and ease of access. The Johnson
City MTPO has procedures for addressing Title VI complaints by making available
a complaint form and an instruction document, in both English and Spanish
languages, on our website at https://jcmpo.org/titlevi.html. Staff has also published a Title VI notice in
the Johnson City Press in January 2019, in both English and Spanish languages.
The TIP document can also be translated into another language, upon request.
Figure 3
TIP
Project Locations in Areas with Minority Populations
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American
Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
As part of FHWA’s regulatory responsibility under Title II of the ADA of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the FHWA ensures that recipients of Federal aid and State and local entities that are responsible for roadways and pedestrian facilities do not discriminate on the basis of disability in any highway transportation program activity, service, or benefit they provide to the general public; and to ensure that people with disabilities have equitable opportunities to use the public rights-of-way system.
Table 4 below describes the status of the ADA Transition Plans that are required for cities and counties with 50 or more employees.
Table 4
Status of
ADA Transition Plans |
||||
Jurisdiction
with 50 or more employees |
ADA Coordinator
Identified |
ADA Grievance
Procedures Developed & Published |
Self-Evaluation
Completed |
ADA
Transition Plan Completed |
City of Elizabethton, TN |
✔ |
✔ |
In Progress |
In Progress (contract with consultant by the
end of 2019) |
City of
Johnson City, TN |
✔ |
✔ |
In
Progress – Partially done |
✔ |
Town of Jonesborough, TN |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Carter
County, TN |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
In
progress (completed by fall 2019) |
Sullivan County, TN |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
In progress (completed by summer 2019) |
Washington
County, TN |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
✔ |
Local public transportation providers rely on its coordination with the Johnson City MTPO public participation process outlined in the PPP to ensure public awareness and outreach of the agencies’ Program of Projects (POP). Johnson City MTPO’s public involvement activities, public notices, and public comment periods on the TIP will satisfy the POP requirement of the Urbanized Area Formula Program (Section 5307) administered by FTA.
Public notices of the TIP will state: “Public involvement activities and time
established for public review and comment on the TIP will satisfy the Program
of Projects requirement for the Federal Transit Administration Urbanized Area
Formula Program.”
At the end of each federal fiscal year, an annual listing of obligated projects, including investments in pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities, for which federal funds have been obligated in the preceding year, will be published or otherwise made available by the cooperative effort of the state, transit operator and metropolitan planning organization for public review. The listing will be consistent with the categories identified in the TIP. The listing includes both highway (FHWA) and transit (FTA) projects. Notice will be given through the website, under the “Projects & Info” tab, on the Twitter account @JohnsonCityMTPO and the Facebook account @JohnsonCityMPO. The listing will be distributed and discussed at the Executive Board/Staff meetings, along with the listing emailed to the members.
The TIP is required to include a financial plan that demonstrates how the program of projects can be implemented. This includes identifying eligible federal, state, and local funding sources. Member jurisdictions of the Johnson City MTPO, TDOT and other agencies that reside in the Johnson City MTPO MPA boundary have submitted projects and indicated they have the financial resources to provide the necessary local matching funds to complete their projects. If funding revenues change, either in the positive or negative level, the TIP will be adjusted or amended when necessary.
Detailed financial breakdowns are included in the Summary Tables in Section G of this document. The total amount of money available in each funding category is shown, as well as the total amount of programmed expenditures and remaining funds by funding source by year. The tables show that programmed expenditures are within the balance of expected fund allocations in accordance with the requirements of the FAST Act. Therefore, the TIP is “fiscally constrained.”
The annual allocation of Surface Transportation Block Grant Program – MPO funds (STBG-M) for the Johnson City Urbanized Area is estimated at $1,759,000 for each fiscal year. The Tennessee Department of Transportation provided this estimate to the Johnson City MTPO. STBG funds are federal funds that come from the Highway Trust Fund through fuel taxes and authorized with the transportation reauthorization Act. In recent years, due to shortfalls, the Highway Trust Fund has been supplemented with general budget appropriations. The current act, the FAST Act, expires on September 30, 2020. Due to expiration of FAST Act, we have been advised by TDOT not to expect an increase of STBG-M allocation to for the MTPO. STBG-M funds are the primary funding source for non-transit transportation projects funded by the Johnson City MTPO. Local matching funds for projects are provided by jurisdictions through their own revenue sources, primarily through property and sales taxes. In developing the TIP, the Johnson City MTPO used the annual allocation to program projects, covering multiple years in the TIP, to ensure they do not exceed projections; however, the annual allocation can vary from year to year, depending upon revenue from the highway trust fund, changes to the gas tax, congressional rescissions, new transportation authorization legislation or other external influences. If this occurs, the Johnson City MTPO will adjust the TIP accordingly.
The Johnson City MTPO works closely with public transportation providers in forecasting transit revenue to include in the TIP, taking into consideration historic funding from the Governor’s allocation of Section 5307 funds and discretionary grant funding in other programs, such as Section 5339.
Each project listed in this TIP has a cost estimate assigned to it. These cost estimates were derived through consultation with local jurisdictions, consultants, the Johnson City MTPO staff, public transportation providers, and TDOT, as was done in developing the MTP. The Johnson City MTPO staff also uses a conceptual planning cost estimation tool provided by TDOT. The Johnson City MTPO used Year of Expenditure (YOE) to calculate future costs. Johnson City MTPO funding requirements are compiled from available data for future expected capital, operating, and maintenance expenditures for highways, transit, and bike/pedestrian transportation modes, as well as from historical expenditures, which have been projected with a 2.5% inflation rate. This rate was determined using historic data.
This TIP was particularly challenging since STBG-M funds and matching funds from the local government will not cover the cost of all existing projects proposed for the TIP. Since the TIP is required to be fiscally constrained, only existing projects that can be fully funded are included in this TIP as ongoing projects.
Therefore, one project has been placed on the illustrative list of projects until funding can be secured to complete the construction phase. This is due to the escalation of costs for the project. The project sponsor is working diligently to re-evaluate alternatives to reduce the construction costs, “rightsizing” the project while maintaining the same footprint, exploring the possibility of developing the project by phases and looking for additional revenue sources. Therefore, at this time, it would be irresponsible of the MTPO to program STBG-M funds for new projects, until existing projects can be funded. Furthermore, it would create unrealistic expectations for the public.
The Johnson City MTPO and its member jurisdictions must assure the maintenance and efficient operation of existing transportation infrastructure. Maintenance activities are those that occur primarily in reaction to situations that have an immediate or imminent adverse impact on the safety or availability of transportation facilities, such as pavement resurfacing and markings, street lighting, sidewalk repair, sinkhole repair, bridge repair, guardrail and sign replacement, and traffic signal maintenance. Operations may include more routine items such as painting and right-of-way maintenance. While these annual activities are not funded through or scheduled in the TIP, they are included in Table 5 on the next page to demonstrate that jurisdictions and agencies have the resources to operate and maintain the new or improved facilities, equipment, and services programmed in the TIP. These numbers are based on uncertain economic growth. Actual numbers may change. For future years, a conservative estimate of a one (1) percent increase in the budget was used and is shown in the Financial Summary of Highway Funds on page 76. In the event Federal transportation funds were made available for maintenance and operations projects, it would be identified in the TIP.
For public transportation providers, funds are spent on daily operations activities and maintenance of vehicles and equipment, which are principal components in sustaining a safe and efficient public transportation infrastructure. Table 6 on the next page provides estimated annual operations and maintenance costs for the public transportation providers.
Table 5
Highway Maintenance and Operations
Budgets – FFY 2020 |
||
Jurisdiction |
Estimated Annual Revenues |
Estimated Annual Costs |
Town of Bluff City, TN |
$357,400 |
$357,400 |
City of Elizabethton, TN |
$3,429,320
|
$3,429,320
|
City of Johnson City, TN |
$15,286,640 |
$15,286,640 |
Town of Jonesborough, TN |
$1,088,040
|
$1,088,040
|
Town of Unicoi, TN |
$641,720 |
$641,720 |
Town of Watauga, TN |
$68,280
|
$68,280
|
Carter County, TN* |
$5,070,160 |
$5,070,160 |
Sullivan County, TN* |
$12,761,080
|
$12,761,080
|
Unicoi County, TN* |
$2,700,240 |
$2,700,240 |
Washington County, TN* |
$11,347,440
|
$11,347,440
|
TDOT |
$11,433,200 |
$11,433,200 |
Total Annual Budget |
$64,183,520 |
$64,183,520 |
*These figures include county-wide costs; the
Washington County Highway Department operates its own asphalt plant for the
county.
Table 6
Public Transportation Maintenance and
Operations Budgets |
||
Revenue Source |
Estimated Annual Revenues |
Estimated Annual Costs |
Operating Assistance - FTA 5307 (Federal & Non-Federal Match) |
$5,342,254 |
$5,342,254 |
Operating Assistance - Other FTA Programs (FTA 5310, Discretionary,
etc.) (Federal & Non-Federal Match) |
$449,248 |
$449,248 |
TDOT Critical Trips (CRIT) Program
(State & Local Match) |
$683,406 |
$683,406 |
Total Annual Budget |
$6,474,908 |
$6,474,908 |
Over the years, new transportation authorizations have eliminated, consolidated, or created transportation funding programs. The newest transportation authorization, the FAST Act, was a five-year authorization enacted on December 4, 2015. MAP-21 was a two-year authorization that was enacted July 6, 2012, and extended until December 4, 2015. Table 7 on the next page summarizes the major funding categories available for transportation projects in the TIP, including a brief description of the types of eligible activities, along with the funding ratio. Please note that although funding sources discussed in Table 7 may not be in the current TIP, this information is provided to educate stakeholders on the funding that is available and the changes that occurred when the FAST Act was signed into law. Many stakeholders may be unaware of these changes and still expect a specific program to be available when it was actually changed, eliminated, or consolidated into another program. Also, the funding ratio may be different for specific safety improvement projects (listed in 23 U.S.C. 120(c)(1)), with up to 100% funded by Federal dollars.
Table 7
Authorized
Federal Transportation Funding Programs |
|||
FAST Act Federal Programs |
MAP-21 Federal Programs |
Description |
Funding Ratio |
Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) |
Provides funding for transportation projects in air quality non-attainment or maintenance areas. CMAQ projects are designed to contribute toward meeting the national ambient air quality standards. |
80%-90% Federal, 0%-10% Non- Federal |
Emergency Relief Program (ER) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
Emergency Relief Program (ER) |
Provides funding for emergency repairs and permanent repairs on Federal-aid highways and roads, and roads on Federal Lands |
80%-100% Federal, 0%-20% Non- Federal |
Federal Lands and Tribal
Transportation Programs (FLTP) (FLAP) |
|||
Programs are largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
· Federal Lands Transportation Program (FLTP) · Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) |
Provides funding for roads providing access to and within Federal and Indian lands. |
80%-100% Federal, 0%-20% Non- Federal |
High Priority Project (HPP) |
|||
Not found in the FAST Act; Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 made changes to be able to repurpose old funding. |
Program was eliminated by MAP-21. |
Provided designated funding for specific projects through congressional earmarks. States are now allowed to repurpose certain funds originally earmarked for specific projects more than 10 years ago. |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
Highway Safety Improvement
Program (HSIP) (PHSIP) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21, but activity must be listed in statute to be eligible. |
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) / Penalty Highway Safety Improvement Program (PHSIP) |
Provides funding for strategies, activities, and projects on a public road that is consistent with a data-driven State Strategic Highway Safety Plan, and corrects/improves a hazardous road location/feature or addresses a highway safety program. If a state does not enforce the open container or minimum penalties for repeat offenders laws, 2 ½ percent of funds shall be reserved for PHSIP activities. The State of Tennessee Strategic Highway Safety Plan follows guidance provided by FHWA to meet the requirements of the FAST Act to obligate funds under HSIP. |
90% Federal 10% Non- Federal (except as provided in 23 U.S.C. 120 and 130) |
National Highway Freight Program
(NHFP) |
|||
New program in the FAST Act. |
N/A |
Provides funding for projects on a designated national freight network that is critical to the safe and efficient shipment of freight in the U.S. Projects must be included in a national and state strategic plan for improvements to highway freight transportation. |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
National Highway Performance
Program (NHPP) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21, with 4 new eligible categories. |
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) |
Provides funding to support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State’s asset management plan for the NHS. |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program (STBG-M) (STBG-S) |
|||
Program’s name is changed to Surface Transportation Block Grant Program. Transportation Alternatives added as a set-aside. |
Surface Transportation Program (STP) - State |
Provides funding for roads functionally classified as rural major collector and above. Funds may be utilized on projects in Rural Areas, Urban Clusters & Urbanized Areas. Other activities include Transportation Alternatives, Safety, and Rail-Highway Crossings. |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
Surface Transportation Program (STP) – MPO |
Provides funding to urban areas of 5,000 to 200,000 in population for improvements on routes functionally classified urban collectors or higher. |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
Transportation Alternatives (TAP); previously Transportation Enhancements (ENH) |
This program is now a set-aside in the STBG for activities such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, historic preservation, environmental mitigation, etc. |
80-90% Federal, 10-20% Non- Federal |
|
Recreational Trails Program (RTP) |
Provides funding for the creation, rehabilitation and maintenance of multi-use recreational trails. However, governor can opt-out to the set-aside from TA funds for this program. |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
|
Transportation Alternatives Program
(TAP) |
|||
Program was eliminated in the FAST Act. |
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) |
No longer a separate program but replaced as a set-aside in the renamed STBG funding formula. |
N/A |
Urbanized Area Formula Grant
(Section 5307) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
FTA-5307 |
Section 5307 is a formula grant program for urbanized areas providing capital, operating, and planning assistance for mass transportation. Other eligible activities include job access and reverse commute projects. Operators must maintain equipment & facilities according to the Transit Asset Management Plan. |
Capital – 80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal Operating – 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal |
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and
Individuals with Disabilities (Section 5310) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
Federal Transit Administration Enhanced Mobility of Seniors & Individuals
with Disabilities (FTA-5310) |
Section 5310 is a formula grant program for urbanized areas that provides funding for operating and capital expenses of state/local governments, non-profit groups, and operators of public transportation providing service to elderly persons or persons with disabilities. |
Capital – 80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal Operating – 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal |
Formula Grant for Rural Areas
(Section 5311) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
Federal Transit Administration Formula Grant for Rural Areas (FTA-5311) |
Section 5311 is a formula grant program provided to states to support public transportation in rural areas of less than 50,000 in population. Funding is available for capital, planning, and operating assistance. |
Capital – 80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal Operating – 50% Federal, 50% Non-Federal |
State of Good Repair (Section
5337) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
Federal Transit Administration State of Good Repair (FTA-3557) |
Section 5337 is a formula grant program providing funds for public transportation providers that operate rail fixed-guideway and high-intensity motorbus systems for capital projects to maintain a system in a state of good repair and for transit asset management. |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
Bus and Bus Facilities (Section
5339) |
|||
Program is largely the same as it was under MAP-21. |
Federal Transit Administration Bus and Bus Facilities (FTA-5339) |
Section 5339 is a formula grant program provides for the establishment of new rail or bus way projects (new starts), the improvement and maintenance of existing rail and other fixed guideway systems that are more than seven (7) years old, and the upgrading of bus systems. |
80% Federal, 20% Non- Federal |
Note: There are other funding programs available in the FAST Act for transportation projects and activities; however, these programs were not reasonably expected to fund any of the projects in this TIP.
The TIP may be modified at any time through two processes. One is the amendment process and the other is the administrative modification process. An Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the Johnson City MTPO and TDOT has been agreed upon which outlines these processes and requirements. Extracts from this MOA are outlined in the sections below. A complete copy of the MOA is provided in Appendix B of this document.
The MOA between the Johnson City MTPO and TDOT identifies the project cost change thresholds that require either an amendment or an administrative modification. Table 8 on the next page shows the project cost change thresholds, a sliding scale of the total programmed funds of all phases of a project that is shown within the approved TIP and how much of a percentage of that change triggers the amendment process or the administrative modification process. This applies to FTA projects as well as FHWA projects. For example, if the total programmed funds is $1 million, and additional funds of $500,000 are being added, the percent cost change is 50 percent, which would require the administrative modification process. If the total project cost is $ 1 million, and additional funds of $800,000 are being added, the percent cost change is 80 percent, which would require the amendment process.
Table 8
Project Cost Change Thresholds |
||
Total programmed funding within the
approved STIP/TIP |
Amendment |
Administrative Modification |
Up to $2 million |
≥ 75% |
< 75% |
$2 million to $15 million |
≥ 50% |
< 50% |
$15 million to $75 million |
≥ 40% |
< 40% |
$75 million and above |
≥ 30% |
< 30% |
An amendment is a revision to the STIP/TIP that involves major changes to a project or the overall program and must meet the requirements of 23 CFR §450.216 and §450.326 regarding public review and comment, re-demonstration of fiscal constraint, and transportation conformity. An amendment requires TDOT and FHWA/FTA approval. An amendment is required when changes to the STIP/TIP include:
· A major change in the total project cost (excluding groupings) (see discussion on project cost change thresholds above); or
· Adding a new project or deleting a project from the STIP/TIP; or
· A major change of project scope; examples include, but are not limited to, changing the number of through-lanes, adding/deleting non-motorized facilities, changing mode (e.g., rolling stock or facility type for transit), changing capital category (i.e., transit funding), or changing termini; or
· Any change requiring a new regional air quality conformity finding (including a grouping); or
· Moving funds between an MPO TIP and STIP unless a written agreement exists between the MPO and TDOT that such an action may be a processed as an administrative modification; or
· Moving funds between an MPO’s TIP and another MPO’s TIP unless a written agreement exists between each MPO and TDOT that such an action may be processed as an administrative modification.
An administrative modification is a minor change from the approved STIP/TIP. Administrative modifications must be consistent with 23 CFR Part 450, but they do not require public review and comment, or a conformity determination in non-attainment or maintenance areas. STIP/TIP administrative modifications are defined as follows:
· A minor change in the total project cost (see project cost change thresholds);
·
A minor change in project description that
does not change the air quality conformity finding in maintenance and/or
non-attainment areas; or
·
A minor change in project
description/termini that is for clarification and does not change the project scope
such as a length change for reasonable transition purposes; or
·
Shifting funds between projects within the
STIP/TIP (i.e., funding sources and projects already identified in the
STIP/TIP) if the change does not result in a cost increase greater than the
amendment threshold (see project cost change thresholds listed above) for the
total project cost of all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
·
Adding an amount of funds already
identified in the STIP/TIP for the current or previous year(s) if:
o The
funds are currently identified in the STIP/TIP either in an existing project or
as available funds; and
o The
change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold
(project cost change thresholds listed above) for the total project cost of all
phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
·
Moving project phases or funding from
year to year within an approved STIP/TIP, except those that cross air quality
horizon years; or
·
Adding any phase (if total project cost
includes all phases), such as environmental or location study, preliminary
engineering, right-of-way, or construction to a project in the STIP/TIP so long
as such a change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment
threshold (see project cost change thresholds) for the total project cost of
all phases shown within the approved/amended STIP/TIP; or
·
Changes required to follow FHWA or FTA
instructions as to the withdrawal of funds or re-establishment of funds
withdrawn at the request of FHWA or FTA; or
·
Moving funds between similarly labeled
groupings, regardless of percent of change; or
·
Adjustments in revenue to match actual
revenue receipts; or
·
Adding a project with 100% state or
non-federal funding for all phases that does not change the air quality
conformity finding in maintenance and/or non-attainment areas.
On November 14, 2018, the Johnson City MTPO notified its members during the Executive Board meeting that a new TIP would be developed and issued a call for projects. With this notification, it was found there was a back log of projects that would be required to be carried over into the new TIP. Staff met individually with each jurisdiction to review current projects and their status, available funding, and capacity for matching local funds for projects. Tables 9 and 10 on the next few pages provide a summary of the status update of the projects. Please note that reoccurring groupings, listed below, are on-going projects with no particular status:
· Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Grouping (90400, STBG-State funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called Surface Transportation Program Grouping);
· National Highway Performance Program Grouping (90500, NHPP funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called National Highway System Infrastructure Grouping);
· Highway Safety Improvement Program Grouping (90600, HSIP/PHSIP funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called Safety Grouping); and
· Transportation Enhancements Grouping (2017-13, TAP funds) (this grouping has a new name in this TIP called Transportation Alternatives Program Grouping).
Table 9
Status of Projects in
FYs 2017-2020 TIP
TIP No. TDOT PIN |
TIP Page No. |
Project Name (Location) |
Description |
Status |
2014-12 118859.00 |
A-1 |
Signalization improvements at two
intersections (Elizabethton) |
Upgrade/install
traffic signals at State Route (SR) 67/SR 359 (Milligan Hwy) and SR 67/Mill
Street |
Completed in 2018 |
2013-02 |
A-2 |
Adaptive Signal Control Phase 1 (Johnson City) |
Add adaptive signal control on SR 381 (N State of Franklin Rd)
in the vicinity of I-26 to improve safety & reduce congestion |
Not started |
2014-11 |
A-3 |
Adaptive Signal Control Phase 2 (Johnson City) |
Deployment
of real-time adaptive traffic signal control technologies (hardware/
software) that will adjust to changing traffic conditions throughout a 24/7
cycle |
Not started |
2010-04 |
A-4 |
Traffic Circle for Greenline Road (Johnson City) |
Installation of traffic circle at the intersection of Greenline
Rd and Peoples St |
Constructed as a traffic signal
with 100% local funds |
2014-01 125528.00 |
A-5 |
Elk Avenue Bridge Repair (Elizabethton) |
Repair
and rehab the Elk Avenue bridge over the Doe River due to deterioration |
Currently in PE Phase; Construction
estimated to begin in FY 2020 |
2017-01 127849.00 |
A-6 |
SR 67/91/US 321 at SR 37/US 19E
Traffic Signal Upgrade (Elizabethton) |
Upgrade and install traffic signal at intersection of SR-37
(US-19E), Intersection at SR-67 (SR-91/US-321/ Broad Street) to improve
safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices,
advanced traffic controls, etc. |
Currently in PE Phase;
Construction estimated to begin in FY 2020 |
2017-02 127426.00 |
A-7 |
SR 34 at Industrial Park Rd Traffic
Signal Upgrade (Bluff City) |
Upgrade
traffic signal to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency
pre-emption devices,
advanced traffic controls, etc. |
Currently in PE Phase; Construction
estimated to begin in FY 2020 |
2006-12 102618.00 |
A-8 |
VA Hospital Connector (Johnson City) |
Construct a new 2 lane access road from SR 034 (West Market St)
to Ashe Ave |
Completed in 2017 |
2008-05 111351.00 |
A-9 |
SR 381 at Indian Ridge Improvements
(Johnson City) |
Add
turn lanes, bridge rehabilitation at intersection of SR 381 (N State of
Franklin Rd) and Indian Ridge Rd |
Completed in 2019 |
2010-05 114592.00 |
A-10 |
Traffic Circle for Mountainview
Rd (Johnson City) |
Installation of traffic circle at the intersection of
Mountainview Rd and Browns Mill Rd |
Completed in 2017 |
125177.00 |
A-11 |
Traffic
Signal for State of Franklin Rd and Harris Drive (Johnson
City) |
Installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of SR381 (State of Franklin Road) and Harris Drive |
Currently
in PE Phase; Construction estimated to begin FY 2020 |
2017-16 |
A-12 |
Traffic Signal for SR 34 (US 11E/
E Jackson Blvd) & Smith Ln (Jonesborough) |
Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of SR 34
(US 11E/East Jackson Boulevard) and Smith Lane. |
Not Started |
2017-21 128783.00 |
A-13 |
Elizabethton ADA Transition Plan (Elizabethton) |
The
City of Elizabethton will complete an ADA Transition Plan that will improve
accessibility to those with disabilities
to comply with ADA requirements. |
Contract for consultant to be issued by
end of 2019 |
2011-30 112456.00 |
D-1 |
I-26 Exit 17 (Johnson City) |
Interchange Modification |
Currently in Construction Phase;
estimated to be completed by 2021 |
2011-31 112457.00 |
D-2 |
I-26 Exit 24 (Johnson City) |
Construct
auxiliary lane and widen eastbound I-26 travel lane, from the end of the
on-ramp from SR-91 to the interchange with SR-67 (U.S. 321) |
Completed in 2018 |
2006-10 043975.01 |
E-1 |
SR 91 Extension (Elizabethton) |
Resurface and restripe existing 5-lane, reconstruct 4-lane to
5-lane, add curb and gutter section, add sidewalk section, reconfigure intersection of North Roan St and
East Elk Ave. |
Currently in ROW Phase; Construction
estimated to begin FY 2020 |
Table 10
Status of FTA Transit
Projects
TIP No. |
TIP Page No. |
Project Name (Agency) |
Description |
Status |
2017-08 |
F-1 |
Operating Expenses (Johnson City Transit) |
Daily
operating of fixed route and demand response service (including employees'
wages, fuel and oil, insurance,
radio communications, operating supplies, and utilities) and capitalized ADA
complementary paratransit
service. |
On-Going |
2017-09 |
F-2 |
Capital Expenses (Johnson City Transit) |
Capitalized Preventive Maintenance (labor, parts, and periodic
routine services) and other capital, including support equipment, associated capital, passenger
waiting shelters and bus stop signs) |
On-Going |
2017-10 |
F-3 |
Para-Transit Vehicles/Buses/ Technology (Johnson City Transit) |
Acquisition
of paratransit vehicles, buses, and/or technology |
5 buses delivered in 2019; 10
paratransit vehicles acquired; paratransit software deployed |
2017-11 |
F-4 |
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors
& Individuals w/ Disabilities (Johnson City Transit) |
Funds operating assistance, capital purchases, and program
administration of Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program (formerly New
Freedom) route service. |
On-Going |
2017-12 |
F-5 |
Dawn of Hope Minivan Purchase |
Acquisition
of 4 ADA vehicles to assist with service expansion for transportation of ADA
clients. |
Not Started; new state law has
drastically changed program |
2017-15 |
F-6 |
New Freedom (Johnson City
Transit) |
Funds operating assistance, capital purchases and program
administration of the New Freedom route service. |
On-Going with redistributed
residual funding |
2017-17 |
F-7 |
Job Access (Johnson City Transit) |
Funds
operating assistance, capital purchases and program administration of the Job
Access Program services. |
On-Going with redistributed residual
funding |
2017-18 |
F-8 |
Operating Expenses (NET Trans) |
Daily operating of demand response transportation services in
the urbanized area outside of the corporate City limits including but not
limited to: Bluff City, Elizabethton, Unicoi, Telford, Jonesborough. Service
will also provide regional connectivity between UZAs. Daily operating of
demand response service (including employees' wages, fuel, insurance, radio communications,
operating supplies and utilities). |
On-Going |
2017-19 |
F-9 |
Capital Equipment (NET Trans) |
Acquisition
of 2 standard rear lift conversion vans to provide transportation services in
the urbanized area outside of the corporate City limits. |
2 vehicles to be delivered in summer 2019 |
2017-20 |
F-10 |
ADA-Accessible Vehicle for
Jonesborough Senior Center (Jonesborough) |
Purchase of an ADA-accessible vehicle to allow the Jonesborough
Senior Center to provide transit options for seniors and others with
disabilities in the surrounding community. |
Vehicle to be delivered in summer
2019 |
After the status of a project was assessed, the determination was made whether to carryover the project to the new TIP. The Executive Staff (technical committee) considered a project’s current status, available funding, and capacity for matching local funds for projects before making the decision to rank the projects and carry them over to the FYs 2020-2023 TIP. Table 11 below lists the carryover projects.
Table 11
Projects to Carryover from FYs 2017-2020 TIP to FYs 2020-2023 TIP
TIP No. TDOT PIN |
TIP Page No. |
Project Name (Location) |
Description |
2014-01 125528.00 |
A-5 |
Elk Avenue Bridge Repair (Elizabethton) |
Repair
and rehab the Elk Avenue bridge over the Doe River due to deterioration |
2017-01 127849.00 |
A-6 |
SR 67/91/US 321 at SR 37/US 19E
Traffic Signal Upgrade (Elizabethton) |
Upgrade and install traffic signal at intersection of SR-37
(US-19E), Intersection at SR-67 (SR-91/US-321/ Broad Street) to improve
safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency pre-emption devices,
advanced traffic controls, etc. |
2017-02 127426.00 |
A-7 |
SR 34 at Industrial Park Rd Traffic
Signal Upgrade (Bluff City) |
Upgrade
traffic signal to improve safety and congestion, such as mast arms, emergency
pre-emption devices,
advanced traffic controls, etc. |
2017-14 125177.00 |
A-11 |
Traffic Signal for State of
Franklin Rd and Harris Drive (Johnson City) |
Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of SR381
(State of Franklin Road) and Harris Drive |
2017-16 |
A-12 |
Traffic Signal for SR 34 (US 11E/ E
Jackson Blvd) & Smith Ln (Jonesborough) |
Installation
of a traffic signal at the intersection of SR 34 (US 11E/East Jackson
Boulevard) and Smith
Lane. |
2017-21 128783.00 |
A-13 |
Elizabethton ADA Transition Plan (Elizabethton) |
The City of Elizabethton will complete an ADA Transition Plan
that will improve accessibility to those with disabilities to comply with ADA requirements. |
2006-10 043975.01 |
E-1 |
SR 91 Extension (Elizabethton) |
Resurface
and restripe existing 5-lane, reconstruct 4-lane to 5-lane, add curb and
gutter section, add sidewalk
section, reconfigure intersection of North Roan St and East Elk Ave. |
Table 12 on the next page provides a listing of illustrative projects, which are un-funded transportation improvement projects within the Johnson City MPA area. These projects are not financially affordable, given the current assumptions on availability of future transportation funds over the four-year TIP period. As funding becomes available, these projects will need to be amended into the financially constrained portion of the FY 2020-2023 TIP in order to be funded.
The first project is the Knob Creek Extension project. At this time, the anticipated level of federal STBG-M funds in the next four years will not be enough to fully fund the construction phase for the Knob Creek Extension project. Therefore, it will not be programmed into the TIP and will remain an illustrative project to meet the fiscal constraints requirements. It should be noted this project has been included in several previous TIPs dating back to 2003. While the Right-of-Way phase is anticipated to be completed by late 2019, additional funding sources for construction must be identified by the project lead, the city of Johnson City, to provide the necessary local match and additional funds for construction of this project. Once all funding sources are identified to fully fund the construction phase, it is anticipated the city of Johnson City will request to advance this project into the active years of the TIP through an amendment.
The second project is the Jonesborough Parkway project. The MTPO staff submitted a request to TDOT in 2018 for a needs assessment planning study on this proposed new corridor in Jonesborough. This project has been included in the last three long-range metropolitan transportation plans. As of now, this project has not been advanced for a study. It remains a high priority to address increased traffic congestion for the Jonesborough area on US 11E / State Route 34 and provide better access to I-26 and north Johnson City.
Table 12
Illustrative Un-Funded Projects
Project Name |
From |
To |
Length Miles |
Type of Improvement |
Project Description |
Phase |
Estimated Cost |
Knob
Creek Rd Extension |
West
of Mizpah Hills Dr |
Market
Place Blvd |
0.939 |
Reconstruction |
Construct
a new 5-lane road with overpass crossing CSX RR |
CONST |
$31,201,810 |
Jonesborough Parkway |
SR-354 (Boones Creek Rd) |
SR-34/US 11E at Persimmon Ridge Rd |
2.7 |
New Road |
Construct a new 3-lane roadway |
All Phases |
Estimate Needed |
This section of the TIP outlines performance measures (PM) and targets as part of the performance-based approach to planning and programming activities that were first established by MAP-21 in 2012, then continued by the FAST Act. Performance-based planning requirements will ensure that the selection of transportation and transit projects show progress toward meeting national goals established to improve the overall transportation and transit system. The Johnson City MTPO has partnered with TDOT and the two local transit providers, Johnson City Transit System (JCT) and Northeast Tennessee Rural Public Transportation (NET Trans), by signing a Memorandum of Understanding to establish a cooperative process to develop, share and report information related to performance measures and performance targets that will show progress toward national goals, which are explained in more detail in this section. Figure 4 below, provided by FHWA in the Performance-Based Planning and Programming Guidebook, is a guide for how the performance-based planning process affects programming of projects into the TIP.
Figure
4
Section 2.5 on page 15 of this TIP document defines the
seven (7) national goals that were established to address safety,
infrastructure, traffic congestion, efficiency, environment, transportation
delays, and project delivery delays. Table 13 below and 14 on the next few
pages outlines each national goal, the performance measures that have been
established by FHWA to make progress toward meeting those goals, along with
their corresponding performance targets, and their status of establishment by
TDOT and the Johnson City MTPO.
Table 13 (PM1)
Transportation National Goals, Performance Measures and Targets |
||||
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline (2015-2019)[1] |
Performance Target for 2016-2020[2] |
Status for TDOT/MTPO |
Safety |
Total
number of traffic-related fatalities on all public roads |
1,006.2 |
1,043.4 |
Targets established by TDOT
on August 31, 2019 and by Johnson City MTPO on December 20, 2019 |
Rate of traffic-related fatalities on
all public roads per 100 million VMT[3] |
1.256 |
1.294 |
||
Total
number of traffic-related serious injuries on all public roads |
6,352.4 |
6,988.8 |
||
Rate of traffic-related serious
injuries on all public roads per 100 million VMT |
7.690 |
9.016 |
||
Total
number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads |
527.2 |
499.0 |
Table 14 (PM2 and PM3)
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
2-Year Performance Target |
4-Year Performance Target |
Status for TDOT/MTPO |
Infrastructure Condition -
Pavement |
Percentage of pavements on the
Interstate System in Good condition |
75.6% |
N/A |
60.0% |
Targets
established by TDOT on May 20, 2018; and by Johnson City MTPO on November 14,
2018 |
Percentage
of pavements on the Interstate System in Poor condition |
0.14% |
N/A |
1.0% |
||
Percentage of the non-interstate
National Highway System in Good condition |
44.8% |
42.0% |
40.0% |
||
Percentage
of the non-interstate National Highway System in Poor condition |
3.24% |
4.0% |
4.0% |
||
Infrastructure Condition -
Bridge |
Percentage of National Highway System
bridges classified as in Good condition |
39.5% |
36.0% |
36.0% |
|
Percentage
of National Highway System bridges classified as in Poor condition |
4.9% |
6.0% |
6.0% |
||
Congestion
Reduction |
Annual
Hours of Peak Hour Excessive Delay Per Capita |
Not applicable to the Johnson
City MTPO Area, which is in attainment and is not eligible for CMAQ funding |
MTPO – not applicable |
MTPO
– not applicable |
Targets
established by TDOT on May 20, 2018; Johnson City MTPO – not applicable |
Percentage of Non-Single Occupancy
Vehicle (SOV) Travel |
|||||
System
Reliability |
Percentage
of the Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate that are reliable |
87.7% |
85.3% |
83.0% |
Targets
established by TDOT on May 20, 2018; and by Johnson City MTPO on November 14,
2018 |
Percentage of the Person-Miles Traveled
on the Non-Interstate National Highway System that are reliable |
N/A |
N/A |
87.5% |
||
National Goal |
Performance
Measure |
Baseline |
2-Year Performance Target |
4-Year Performance Target |
Status for TDOT/MTPO |
Freight
Movement & Economic Vitality |
Percentage of Interstate System mileage
providing reliable truck travel time |
1.35 |
1.35 |
1.33 |
Targets established by TDOT
on May 20, 2018; and by Johnson City MTPO on November 14, 2018 |
Environmental
Sustainability |
Total emissions reductions by
applicable pollutants under the CMAQ program |
Not
applicable to the Johnson City MTPO Area, which is in attainment and is not
eligible for CMAQ funding |
MTPO
– not applicable |
MTPO
– not applicable |
Targets
established by TDOT on May 20, 2018; Johnson City MTPO – not applicable |
FTA has also established performance measures and targets for the public transportation providers for a strategic and systematic process of operating, maintaining, and improving public capital assets effectively through their entire life cycle, along with requirements for safety management systems. The regional targets for Transit Asset Management are shown in Table 15 on the next page. The final transit safety targets will be added in late 2020, once public transportation providers complete their Public Transportation Agency Safety Plans, and will include targets for the national safety performance measures shown in Table 16 on page 41.
Table 15
Transit National Goals, Performance Measures and Targets |
||||
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline (June 2019) |
Performance Target (June 2020) |
Status for Public Transportation
Providers / MTPO |
Transit
Asset Management |
Rolling
Stock: The percentage of revenue
vehicles (by type) that exceed the useful life benchmark (ULB) |
Bus - 0% Cutaway - 84% Minivan - 3% Vans - <25% |
Bus - 0% Cutaway - <75% Minivan - 3% Vans - <25% |
Public transportation providers established targets on June 21,
2019; Johnson City MTPO established targets on August 28, 2019 |
Equipment: The percentage of non-revenue service
vehicles (by type) that exceed the ULB |
Service
Vehicles - 40% |
Service
Vehicles - <40% |
||
Facilities: The percentage of facilities (by
group) that are rated less than 3.0 on the Transit Economic Requirements
Model (TERM) Scale |
Maintenance - 0% Passenger - 0% |
Maintenance - 0% Passenger - 0% |
||
Infrastructure:
The percentage of track segments (by mode) that have performance
restrictions |
Not
applicable as JCT does not operate passenger trains |
Not
applicable as JCT does not operate passenger trains |
Not applicable |
Table 16
Transit National Goals, Performance Measures and Targets |
||||
National Goal |
Performance Measure |
Baseline |
Performance Target |
Status for Public Transportation
Providers / MTPO |
Improving
the transit industry’s safety performance |
Fatalities:
Total number of reportable
fatalities and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode |
TBD |
TBD |
Public transportation providers to establish targets by July 20,
2020; Johnson City MTPO to establish targets by January 20, 2021 |
Injuries:
Total number of reportable
injuries and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode |
TBD |
TBD |
||
Safety
Events: Total number of reportable
events and rate per total vehicle revenue miles by mode |
TBD |
TBD |
||
System
Reliability: Mean
distance between major mechanical failures by mode |
TBD |
TBD |
Section 2.2 on page 13 of this TIP document describes the process and the criteria that are used to select projects to include in the TIP. Current projects in the TIP are carryover projects from previous TIPs. This is due to fiscal constraint and cost escalation. The MTPO does not have enough resources, federal or other, at this time to fund all the existing projects. Nevertheless, projects were scored and prioritized. The project selection criteria were largely the same as previous TIPs; however, many can be shown to support performance targets. Table 17 on the next page shows the linkage of project selection criteria to the performance targets.
Table 17
Linkage of Performance Measures to Project Selection Criteria |
|
Performance Measure |
Project
Selection Criteria |
Safety |
· Promotes/ improves safety |
Pavement / Bridge
Condition |
(Please note: None of
the jurisdictions in the Johnson City MTPO MPA maintains or manages projects
on the interstate or NHS routes – TDOT does) |
Congestion Reduction |
· Reduces/manages congestion in travel demand model; · Improves traffic operations; · Alternative mode (bike, pedestrian, and other modes); · ITS project (Please note: the Johnson City MTPO MPA is an attainment area and is not eligible for CMAQ funding) |
System Reliability |
(Please note: None of
the jurisdictions in the Johnson City MTPO MPA maintains or manages projects
on the interstate or NHS routes – TDOT does) |
Freight Movement & Economic Vitality |
· Improves facility for freight movement (air, rail, distribution); · Enhances economic development investments (Please note: None of the jurisdictions in the Johnson City MTPO MPA maintains or manages projects on the interstate or NHS routes – TDOT does) |
Environmental
Sustainability |
· Promotes positive affect on air quality (Please note: the Johnson City MTPO MPA is an attainment area and is not eligible for CMAQ funding) |
Transit Asset Management |
· Transit capital improvement |
The projects in the TIP were requested in the past by local jurisdictions based on their needs and concern for safety and improved transportation performance. These requests included traffic signals, bridge repair, and congestion relief through widening or alternate routings. The anticipated effect of these projects in the TIP toward achieving the performance targets set by TDOT and supported by the Johnson City MTPO mentioned in this section can be expected to positively contribute to the overall progress of meeting the state’s targets, albeit a small impact. The one exception to this was the request by one of the member jurisdictions to fund an ADA Transition plan with STBG funds. While this is not a project in the construction sense, the plan will serve as a guide for implementing projects that safely meet the needs of persons and family members with disabilities. Since the project is using STBG funds, it will be kept in the TIP for fiscal constraint and tracking by the MTPO; however, it will also be included in and cross-referenced in the UPWP, as it is a plan.
The Johnson City MTPO reviewed all the projects in the TIP for inclusion and compliance with the MTPO’s adopted 2045 MTP, which included the National Goals for Performance-Based Planning. The Johnson City MTP was adopted on February 22, 2018, before the Performance Measures became effective on May 27, 2018. As such, the linkage of the TIP to the National Goals for Performance-Based Planning and Programming that were available at the time of adoption and the Johnson City MTPO will be incorporating the performance measures in the next cycle of the MTP update, which is programmed in the FY 2020-2021 UPWP to begin in the spring of 2021.
Table 18 below demonstrates the linkage between the goals and objectives within the 2045 MTP to the federal planning factors and national goals in the FAST Act. As you can see, the four MTP goals and corresponding objectives support achievement of each of the seven (7) national goals and each of the ten (10) federal planning factors.
Table 18
Linking
MTP Goals to National Goals |
|||
2045 MTP Goals |
2045 MTP Objectives |
FAST Act |
|
Federal Planning Factors |
National Goals |
||
Goal
#1: Improve Safety and Security throughout the Transportation System of the
MTPO Area |
Objective: Encourage partnerships with other
transportation and non-transportation agencies to enhance transportation
safety and security |
Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized
users. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and
non-motorized users. |
Safety - Achieve a significant reduction in
traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. |
Objective: Reduce secondary traffic accidents |
|||
Objective: Establish initiatives (projects and
programs) to improve the safety and security of vulnerable roadway users (e.g. pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, and the young
and old) |
|||
Goal
# 2: Reduce Traffic Congestion along Major Routes of the MTPO Area |
Objective: Reduce travel delays between major
areas of attractions in the MTPO study area |
Increase accessibility and mobility
of people and freight. Promote efficient system management and
operation. |
Congestion
reduction - Achieve a significant
reduction in congestion on the National Highway System. System
reliability -
Improve the efficiency of the surface transportation system. |
Objective: Seek cost-effective management
solutions and new technologies as a means of addressing congestion, reducing
transportation delay, improving travel time reliability, and improving system
operations |
|||
Objective: Increase transit and other
transportation demand management opportunities |
|||
Objective: Enhance the flow of raw materials and
manufactured products |
|||
Goal #
3: Promote Economic Growth and Livability by Enhancing the Transportation
System for the MTPO Area |
Objective:
Maintain what we have – take a “state of good repair” approach to our
community’s transportation assets |
Emphasize the preservation
of the existing transportation system. Improve the resiliency
of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of
surface transportation. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve
the quality of life,
and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and
local planned growth and economic development patterns. |
Infrastructure
condition - Maintain the highway infrastructure
asset system in a state of good repair. Environmental
sustainability - Enhance the performance
of the transportation system while protecting and enhancing the natural
environment. |
Objective: Remove obstacles to economic growth through
improved transportation facilities and the integration and connectivity of
the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight
thus allowing for the continued expansion of the business community |
|||
Objective:
Promote alternative forms of transportation (such as walking, biking, and
transit) where possible |
|||
Objective: Seek improvement options and strategies which
minimize adverse impacts of surface transportation to historical, social,
cultural, and natural environments, including stormwater impacts, and reduce
transportation impacts on air-quality |
|||
Goal #
4: Enhance Regional Access to and from the MTPO Area |
Objective:
Maintain and improve access to regional areas outside of the MTPO study area |
Enhance the integration
and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. Enhance travel
and tourism Support the economic
vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global
competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. |
Freight
movement and economic vitality -
Improve the national freight network, strengthen the ability of rural
communities to access national and international trade markets, and support
regional economic development. (continued
on the next page) Reduced
project delivery delays - Reduce project costs,
promote jobs and the economy, and expedite the movement of people and goods
by accelerating project completion through eliminating delays in the project
development and delivery process, including reducing regulatory burdens and improving
agencies' work practices. |
Objective: Support transportation investments
and policies that work to create jobs and improve access to people, tourism,
places, and goods while embracing access management and corridor management
strategies that preserve the long-term functionality of a roadway’s capacity
and safety |
|||
Objective: Strategically target transportation
investments to areas supportive and conducive to growth and redevelopment
initiatives |
Figure 5 on the next page demonstrates the linkage of other state and MTPO performance-based plans that provide information for the planning of investment priorities and programming of projects into the TIP. This diagram was based on a model provided in the FHWA Transportation Performance Management Toolbox, which was adapted from the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Family of Plans.
Figure
5
Linkage of Investment Priorities to Programming
Process
The following sections constitute the program of projects to
be included in the FYs 2020-2023 TIP.
Figure 6 on the next page
demonstrates how to read the TIP project pages.
An interactive version of the FYs 2020-2023 TIP, with a map
and database, is available online at http://jcmpotip.johnsoncitytn.org/proposed.
Figure 6: How to Read a TIP
Project Page
Johnson City MTPO FY 2020 - 2023 TIP |
||||||
Financial Summary of
Highway Funds |
||||||
Highway Totals for FY 2020 |
||||||
Funding Source |
Est. Fed Revenue |
Programmed Funds |
Federal Funds |
State Funds |
Local Funds |
Federal Balance |
STBG-M |
$9,465,357 |
$1,744,396 |
$1,515,917 |
$0 |
$228,479 |
$7,949,440 |
STBG-S |
$2,961,561 |
$3,664,451 |
$2,961,561 |
$702,890 |
$0 |
$0 |
HPP |
$2,132,439 |
$2,665,549 |
$2,132,439 |
$533,110 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP |
$2,070,000 |
$2,300,000 |
$2,070,000 |
$230,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP-R |
$13,500 |
$15,000 |
$13,500 |
$1,500 |
$0 |
$0 |
NHPP |
$168,000 |
$210,000 |
$168,000 |
$42,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
TAP |
$797,424 |
$996,780 |
$797,424 |
$0 |
$199,356 |
$0 |
ACNHPP |
$0 |
$4,000,000 |
$0 |
$4,000,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
Opr & Maint |
$0 |
$64,183,520 |
$0 |
$11,433,200 |
$52,750,320 |
$0 |
Totals: |
$17,608,281 |
$79,779,696 |
$9,658,841 |
$16,942,700 |
$53,178,155 |
$7,949,440 |
|
||||||
Highway Totals for FY 2021 |
||||||
Funding Source |
Est. Fed Revenue |
Programmed Funds |
Federal Funds |
State Funds |
Local Funds |
Federal Balance |
STBG-M |
$9,708,440 |
$1,840,677 |
$1,735,942 |
$0 |
$104,735 |
$7,972,498 |
STBG-S |
$1,600,000 |
$2,000,000 |
$1,600,000 |
$400,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP |
$140,625 |
$156,250 |
$140,625 |
$15,625 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP-R |
$81,000 |
$90,000 |
$81,000 |
$9,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
NHPP |
$144,000 |
$180,000 |
$144,000 |
$36,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
TAP |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Opr & Maint |
$0 |
$64,825,355 |
$0 |
$11,547,532 |
$53,277,823 |
$0 |
Totals: |
$11,674,065 |
$69,092,282 |
$3,701,567 |
$12,008,157 |
$53,382,558 |
$7,972,498 |
Highway Totals for FY 2022 |
||||||
Funding Source |
Est. Fed Revenue |
Programmed Funds |
Federal Funds |
State Funds |
Local Funds |
Federal Balance |
STBG-M |
$9,731,498 |
$2,676,803 |
$2,616,442 |
$0 |
$60,361 |
$7,115,056 |
STBG-S |
$1,328,000 |
$1,660,000 |
$1,328,000 |
$332,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP |
$84,375 |
$93,750 |
$84,375 |
$9,375 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP-R |
$405 |
$450 |
$405 |
$45 |
$0 |
$0 |
NHPP |
$400,000 |
$500,000 |
$400,000 |
$100,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
TAP |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
CRRSAA-HIP |
$698,197 |
$698,197 |
$698,197 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Opr & Maint |
$0 |
$65,473,609 |
$0 |
$11,663,007 |
$53,810,601 |
$0 |
Totals: |
$12,242,475 |
$71,102,809 |
$5,127,419 |
$12,104,427 |
$53,870,962 |
$7,115,056 |
Highway Totals for FY 2023 |
||||||
Funding Source |
Est. Fed Revenue |
Programmed Funds |
Federal Funds |
State Funds |
Local Funds |
Federal Balance |
STBG-M |
$8,874,056 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$8,874,056 |
STBG-S |
$1,936,000 |
$2,420,000 |
$1,936,000 |
$484,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP |
$56,250 |
$62,500 |
$56,250 |
$6,250 |
$0 |
$0 |
HSIP-R |
$203 |
$226 |
$203 |
$23 |
$0 |
$0 |
NHPP |
$72,000 |
$90,000 |
$72,000 |
$18,000 |
$0 |
$0 |
TAP |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Opr & Maint |
$0 |
$66,128,345 |
$0 |
$11,779,637 |
$54,348,707 |
$0 |
Totals: |
$10,938,509 |
$68,701,071 |
$2,064,453 |
$12,287,910 |
$54,348,707 |
$8,874,056 |
Financial Summary of STBG-M Funds |
||
FY 2020 - 2023 TIP |
||
(Federal Funds Only) |
||
2020 |
||
Carryover Balance |
|
$7,706,357 |
Allocation |
+ |
$1,759,000 |
Total Funds Available |
= |
$9,465,357 |
Projects |
- |
$1,515,917 |
Remaining 2020 |
= |
$7,949,440 |
2021 |
||
Carryover Balance |
|
$7,949,440 |
Allocation |
+ |
$1,759,000 |
Total Funds Available |
= |
$9,708,440 |
Projects |
- |
$1,735,942 |
Remaining 2021 |
= |
$7,972,498 |
2022 |
||
Carryover Balance |
|
$7,972,498 |
Allocation |
+ |
$1,759,000 |
Total Funds Available |
= |
$9,731,498 |
Projects |
- |
$2,616,442 |
Remaining 2022 |
= |
$7,115,056 |
2023 |
||
Carryover Balance |
|
$7,115,056 |
Allocation |
+ |
$1,759,000 |
Total Funds Available |
= |
$8,874,056 |
Projects |
- |
$0 |
Remaining 2023 |
= |
$8,874,056 |
Financial Summary of Transit Funds |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
FY
2020 |
|
FY
2021 |
||||||
|
Federal
|
State |
Local |
Total |
|
Federal
|
State |
Local |
Total |
Anticipated Revenue |
$ 3,742,205 |
$ 479,606 |
$1,995,229 |
$ 6,217,040 |
$ 3,114,365 |
$164,007 |
$ 2,029,672 |
$ 5,308,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5307 - Operating |
$ 1,868,888 |
$ - |
$1,704,888 |
$ 3,573,776 |
$ 2,029,805 |
$ - |
$ 1,865,665 |
$ 3,895,470 |
|
5307 - Capital |
$ 257,000 |
$ 32,125 |
$ 32,125 |
$ 321,250 |
$257,000 |
$32,125 |
$32,125 |
$ 321,250 |
|
5307 - Acquisition |
$ 158,000 |
$ 14,000 |
$ 14,000 |
$ 186,000 |
$259,600 |
$32,450 |
$32,450 |
$ 324,500 |
|
5339 - Acquisition |
$816,242 |
$307,284 |
$118,019 |
$ 1,241,545 |
$ 305,460
|
$ 38,182 |
$
38,182 |
$
381,824 |
|
5317 - Operating |
$92,500 |
$46,250 |
$46,250 |
$ 185,000 |
$ 92,500 |
$ 46,250 |
$ 46,250 |
$ 185,000 |
|
5316 - Operating |
$30,000 |
$15,000 |
$15,000 |
$ 60,000 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
5310 - Acquisition |
$ 519,575 |
$ 64,947 |
$ 64,947 |
$ 649,469 |
$ 170,000 |
$ 15,000 |
$ 15,000 |
$ 200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Expenditures |
$ 3,742,205 |
$ 479,606 |
$1,995,229 |
$ 6,217,040 |
$ 3,114,365 |
$164,007 |
$ 2,029,672 |
$ 5,308,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
FY
2022 |
|
FY
2023 |
||||||
|
Federal
|
State |
Local |
Total |
|
Federal
|
State |
Local |
Total |
Anticipated Revenue |
$ 2,652,604 |
$ 124,328 |
$1,872,975 |
$ 4,649,907 |
$ 2,549,954 |
$124,328 |
$ 1,767,828 |
$ 4,442,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5307 - Operating |
$ 1,915,248 |
$ - |
$1,748,647 |
$ 3,663,895 |
$ 1,812,598 |
$ - |
$ 1,643,500 |
$ 3,456,098 |
|
5307 - Capital |
$ 259,600 |
$ 32,450 |
$ 32,450 |
$ 324,500 |
$ 259,600 |
$ 32,450 |
$ 32,450 |
$ 324,500 |
|
5307 - Acquisition |
$ 38,250 |
$ 3,375 |
$ 3,375 |
$ 45,000 |
$38,250 |
$3,375 |
$3,375 |
$ 45,000 |
|
5339 - Acquisition |
$ 170,000 |
$ 15,000 |
$ 15,000 |
$ 200,000 |
$ 170,000 |
$ 15,000 |
$ 15,000 |
$ 200,000 |
|
5317 - Operating |
$
120,756 |
$
60,378 |
$
60,378 |
$
241,512 |
$
120,756 |
$ 60,378 |
$
60,378 |
$
241,512 |
|
5316 - Operating |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
5310 - Acquisition |
$ 148,750 |
$ 13,125 |
$ 13,125 |
$ 175,000 |
$ 148,750 |
$ 13,125 |
$ 13,125 |
$ 175,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programmed Expenditures |
$ 2,652,604 |
$ 124,328 |
$1,872,975 |
$ 4,649,907 |
$ 2,549,954 |
$124,328 |
$ 1,767,828 |
$ 4,442,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
AND
THE JOHNSON CITY METROPOLITAN
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ORGANIZATION
REGARDING THE DEFINITION AND NEED
FOR AMENDMENTS I ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS IN
THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this Memorandum of Agreement
is to establish two categories of actions to meet Federal requirements and
streamline the maintenance of the Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program/Transportation Improvement Program (STIP/TIP). One category of action is a "STIP/TIP
Amendment" and the other is a "STIP/TIP Administrative
Modification."
As detailed in Title
23 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 450, the STIP is defined in Federal
regulations as “a statewide prioritized listing/program of transportation
projects covering a period of 4 years that is consistent with the long-range
statewide transportation plan, metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs, and
required for projects to be eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and
title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.” All projects and groupings in the STIP and TIPs
must list the eligible funding source(s) (e.g., FTA Section program, Surface
Transportation Block Grant, etc.). Approval authority over the STIP and all
STIP amendments lies with FHWA and FTA.
Per 23 CFR 450.218,
the State of Tennessee STIP shall include each metropolitan TIP for each MPO in
Tennessee, as approved by the associated MPO and TDOT (as delegated authority
from the Governor of the State of Tennessee). Per Federal regulations, TDOT can
elect to include the metropolitan TIPs in the STIP directly or by reference,
with specific expectations for each option:
•
Direct inclusion of the metropolitan TIP – in this situation,
TDOT’s STIP, as published and approved by FHWA and FTA, will include all projects
listed in the approved metropolitan TIP, regardless of project sponsor or
funding source. Accordingly, FHWA and FTA will match authorization requests for
all projects across the State of Tennessee to the latest approved/amended STIP.
•
Inclusion of the metropolitan TIP by reference – in this
situation, TDOT’s STIP, as published and approved by FHWA and FTA, will make
narrative reference to the metropolitan TIPs, as approved by the MPO and TDOT.
Accordingly, FHWA and FTA will match all authorization requests for projects in
metropolitan areas to the latest approved/amended metropolitan TIP, and all
authorization requests for projects in non-metropolitan areas will be matched
to the latest approved/amended STIP.
More information on
the amendment/administrative modification processes and authorization requests
is available below.
STIP/TIP AMENDMENT:
An amendment is a revision to the
STIP/TIP that involves major changes to a project or the overall program and
must meet the requirements of 23 CFR §450.216 and §450.326 regarding public
review and comment, re-demonstration of fiscal constraint, and transportation
conformity. An amendment is required when changes to the STIP/TIP include:
•
A
major change in the total project cost (excluding groupings) (see discussion on
project cost change thresholds with Table A); or
• Adding a new project or deleting a project from the
STIP/TIP; or
•
A
major change of project scope; examples include, but are not limited to,
changing the number of through-lanes, adding/deleting non-motorized facilities
(i.e. greenways, sidewalks, bike lanes, transfer stations, etc.), changing mode
(e.g., rolling stock or facility type for transit, such as light rail cars
instead of trolleys, vans instead of buses, etc. ), changing capital category
(i.e., transit funding added to a CMAQ funded project or CMAQ funding
substituted for transit funding), or changing termini; or
• Any change requiring a new regional air quality conformity
finding (including a grouping); or
•
Moving
funds between a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) TIP and STIP unless a
written agreement exists between the MPO and the Tennessee Department of
Transportation (TDOT) that such an action may be a processed as an administrative
modification; or
•
Moving
funds between an MPO’s TIP and another MPO’s TIP unless a written agreement exists
between each MPO and TDOT that such an action may be processed as an administrative
modification.
AMENDMENT
DOCUMENT AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES:
The STIP/TIP may be amended at any
time, but amendments require Federal approval and redetermination of STIP/TIP
fiscal constraint and air quality conformity, where applicable. TDOT will
review each TIP amendment, approve its inclusion in the STIP, and submit the
amendment to the appropriate Federal Agency. The Federal Agencies will independently
review and respond to a formal written request for amendment approval from TDOT
within 10 business days of receipt.
Documentation:
The MPO will send the following documentation to TDOT:
•
Electronic
correspondence describing the action taken and requesting review and approval
of the proposed amendment;
• A copy of the original and amended TIP pages;
• Documentation supporting:
o
Fiscal constraint,
o
Interested parties’ participation
(i.e., public involvement, stakeholder involvement,
and consultation),
o
Air quality conformity (in
non-attainment and/or maintenance areas only), and
o
Required MPO certifications,
including the MPO Self-Certification with a current date; and
o
The resolution adopting the
amendment.
For financial transactions, the MPO must identify in the
documentation the origin and destination of the funds being moved.
Regardless of whether the metropolitan TIP is included
directly or by reference into the STIP, both the MPO and TDOT (through authority
delegated by the Governor of Tennessee) must approve any TIP amendment
including State managed projects before transmittal to FHWA/FTA for inclusion
in the STIP. FHWA and FTA still retain authority over the inclusion of any
amendments into the STIP, whether the TIP is included directly or by reference.
In both cases, TDOT shall send the above-described documentation to FHWA/FTA
for review and approval of the TIP amendment, along with a current
Self-Certification for the STIP.
When FHWA or FTA approves an
amendment, the appropriate approving agency will send to TDOT and the MPO:
• The original amendment review request,
• The original supporting amendment documentation, and
• Letter documenting FHWA's or FTA's approval.
• For transit projects, the Multimodal office should work with
the Program Development and Scheduling office to ensure that any amendments are
included in the updated STIP.
Amendment documentation will conform to the correspondence
standards outlined in Appendix A.
STIP/TIP
ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATIONS:
A STIP/TIP administrative
modification is a minor change from the approved STIP/TIP. Administrative
modifications must be consistent with 23 CFR Part 450, but they do not require
public review and comment, or a conformity determination in non-attainment or
maintenance areas. STIP/TIP administrative modifications are defined as
follows:
• A minor change in the total project cost (see Table A)
• A minor change in project description that does not change
the air quality conformity
finding in maintenance and/or non-attainment areas; or
• A minor change in project description/termini that is for
clarification and does not change
the project scope such as a length change for reasonable
transition purposes or to correct minor clerical errors or discrepancies; or
•
Shifting
funds between projects or groupings within the STIP/TIP (i.e., funding sources
and projects already identified in the STIP/TIP) if the change does not result
in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see Table A) for the
total project cost of all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
• Adding an amount of funds already identified in the STIP/TIP
for the current or previous
year(s) if:
o
The
funds are currently identified in the STIP/TIP either in an existing project or
as available funds and
o
The
change does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold
(project cost change thresholds listed in Table A) for the total project cost of
all phases shown within the approved STIP/TIP; or
•
Moving
project phases or funding from year to year within an approved STIP/TIP, except
those that cross air quality horizon years of the project; or
•
Adding
any phase (if total project cost includes all phases), such as environmental or
location study, preliminary engineering, right-of-way, or construction to a
project in the STIP/TIP so long as such a change does not result in a cost
increase greater than the amendment threshold (see Table A) for the total project
cost of all phases shown within the approved/amended STIP/TIP; or
• Changes required to follow FHWA or FTA instructions as to
the withdrawal of funds or
re-establishment of funds withdrawn at the request of FHWA
or FTA; or
• Moving funds between similarly labeled groupings, regardless
of percent of change, or adding or removing a project(s) to or from an already
established grouping; or
• Adjustments in revenue to match actual revenue receipts; or
• Adding a project with 100% state or
non-federal funding for all phases that does not change the air quality conformity finding in maintenance and/or non-attainment areas; or
• Adding or changing a funding source, as long as the change
does not result in a cost increase greater than the amendment threshold (see
Table A);
ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION DOCUMENT
PROCEDURES:
Administrative
modifications do not require Federal approval. Accordingly, no interested
parties’ participation or air quality conformity is required. TDOT and the MPOs
will work cooperatively to address and respond to any FHWA and/or FTA
comment(s). FHWA and FTA reserve the right to question any administrative
action that is not consistent with Federal regulations or with this MOA. Administrative modifications made to
TDOT-sponsored projects in the TIP will be requested by TDOT through
notification to the MPO upon submission of the administrative modification to
FHWA/FTA. The MPO will make the changes
to funding tables, and project sheets as needed without the need for
distribution.
Documentation:
The MPO will send the following documentation to TDOT for
locally-sponsored projects:
• Electronic correspondence describing the action taken;
• A copy of the original and modified TIP pages.
For financial transactions, the MPO must
identify in the documentation the origin and destination of the funds being
moved. Administrative modification documentation will conform to the
correspondence standards outlined in Appendix A.
AUTHORIZATION:
FHWA and FTA match project authorization requests to the
STIP/TIP prior to approving a request for project authorization. Therefore, all
administrative modifications and amendments must be processed to completion
prior to TDOT requesting federal authorization approvals. For projects in MPO
areas TDOT must ensure FHWA and FTA receipt of documented notification that the
respective MPO has accounted for the administrative modification unless TDOT
has a formal agreement with the respective MPO stating otherwise.
In the FMIS authorization request, TDOT shall provide the
most recent amendment and administrative modification numbers affecting the
project in the "STIP Reference" field or in the "State
Remarks" if additional space is required.
PROJECT
COST CHANGE THRESHOLDS:
For changes to the cost of projects (excluding groupings and
reductions of any amount provided project length, termini, and description
remain the same), a sliding scale (see Table A) is outlined to determine which
category of revision is required. All measurements for these cost changes will
be made from the last approved STIP or STIP amendment/administrative
modification to account for incremental changes.
TABLE A
Total programmed funding within
the approved STIP/TIP |
Amendment |
Administrative Modification |
Up to $2 million |
≥75% |
< 75% |
$2 million to $15 million |
≥50% |
< 50% |
$15 million to $75 million |
≥40% |
< 40% |
$75 million and above |
≥30% |
< 30% |
PROJECT PHASE OVERRUNS AND UNDERRUNS:
Project overruns and underruns for
previously authorized phases of projects in a previous TIP will not be
programmed in the current TIP. If the phase of the project is in the current TIP then the rules of this document will apply; however, if
the phase of the project was authorized in a previous TIP no action will be
necessary within the current TIP. If a project programmed in a grouping incurs
an overrun or underrun from a previously authorized phase, no TIP action will
be needed. Any request for authorization of a new phase will need to follow the
rules within this document.
• If a project is being closed out but incurs an overrun, it
will not require an amendment or administrative modification.
PROJECT
GROUPINGS:
The use of project groupings is permitted
under 23 CFR §450.218(j) for projects located in the non-metropolitan portion
of the STIP and 23 CFR §450.326(h) for projects in an MPO's TIP. Projects that
are funded by such groupings are to be of a scale small enough not to warrant individual
identification and may be grouped by function, work type, and/or geographic
area using the applicable classifications under 23 CFR §771.117(c) and (d)
and/or 40 CFR part 93. Project groupings may only include projects that meet
the following conditions: non-regionally significant, environmentally neutral,
and exempt from air quality conformity. As appropriate, in instances where it
is uncertain if specific project(s) meet those conditions in air quality
nonattainment or maintenance areas, the sponsoring agency, in coordination with
the MPO, must consult with the appropriate Interagency Consultation group (IAC)
to determine whether the specific project(s) proposed to be included with the
grouping are subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 93.
The STIP/TIP will include a
description of all grouping categories, eligible activities, and sufficient
financial information to demonstrate the projects that are to be implemented
using current and/or reasonably available revenues. The MPO will develop the
grouping categories and eligible activities included within the STIP/TIP in
consultation with TDOT. All TDOT-sponsored projects located within an MPO area
must be included in the MPO’s TIP, including those projects that are eligible
for grouping. Therefore, projects eligible for groupings that are located
within the MPO planning area may be grouped within the MPO’s TIP or listed
individually in the MPO’s TIP, but may not be included in the STIP.
PROJECTS IN RURAL/URBAN AREAS AND PROJECTS IN TWO (2) OR MORE
MPOs
All projects that cross the MPO
boundary and include an area outside of the MPO boundary will be programmed in
the TIP only.
In instances where a project is in
two (2) or more MPO planning areas, the affected MPOs will consult and
coordinate as to which MPO is most impacted by the project, taking into
consideration project limits, air quality conformity requirements, regional
significance, etc. The MPO most impacted
will program the project in its TIP and include it in the demonstration of
fiscal constraint. The other MPO(s) will
reference the project in its TIP for informational purposes. In instances where
the MPOs are unable to reach an agreement, TDOT will facilitate a consultation
process with the affected MPOs, TDOT, and FHWA/FTA.
CONSULTATION PROCESS:
The MPO will consult with TDOT and
the appropriate approving agency (i.e., FTA for transit projects and FHWA for
highway projects) on the suitable category of action when the proposed change
to the STIP/TIP does not clearly fall into the category of a "STIP/TIP
Amendment" or a "STIP/TIP Administrative Modification" or the
proposed change involves extenuating circumstances. Consultations will suspend
the formal 10 business day review period for "STIP/TIP Amendments" until
a resolution is established. The MPO also will consult with the appropriate approving
agency prior to adding new non-formula or specialized federal funds (such as
BUILD program funds) to a project to determine if the addition of the funds
would warrant an amendment.
PROCESS REVIEW:
The MPO and TDOT will review this
agreement in conjunction with each Statewide Planning Finding or when STIP/TIP
management procedures are substantively changed (e.g., implementation of an
electronic STIP/TIP). The focus of the review is to verify the appropriate use
of the agreed-to amendment and administrative modification processes and
consistency with Federal regulations.
We, the undersigned, approve this
Memorandum of Agreement. This Agreement will become effective upon approval of
signature by all parties, and will remain in effect as long as each agency
agrees to and abides by the conditions set forth in this document. This
Agreement may be amended at any time, but revisions will require signature by
all parties. Any signatory to this Agreement may propose amendment to the
agreement at any time.
All prior agreements and correspondence related to the
definition and need for amendments or administrative modifications to STIP/TIPs
are voided with the execution of this agreement.
SIGNATURES:
_______________________________________________ ______________________
Jenny Brock, Chair
Date
Johnson City MTPO Executive Board
_______________________________________________ ______________________
Clay Bright, Commissioner
Date
Tennessee Department of Transportation
APPENDIX
A: CORRESPONDENCE STANDARDS
All amendment and administrative modification correspondence
will be submitted to TDOT’s Program Development and Scheduling Office. The MPO
will submit the correspondence and documentation to STIP.Requests@tn.gov and the Program Monitor in the Program Development and Scheduling
Office responsible for the TDOT Region in which the MPO is located.
Amendment Documentation:
Amendment documentation will be
grouped in a single electronic document with the naming convention,
"Amendment [X] ([Project#])'', where [X] identifies the amendment's
sequential identifier and [Project #] represents the unique project number(s)
of the program element(s) being amended.
Email correspondence will use the naming convention,
"Amendment [X], [Organization]" in the subject line where [X]
identifies the amendment's sequential identifier and [Organization] represents
name of the organization (MPO) submitting the amendment. The body of the email
or cover letter/project description within the packet will include all
applicable information as needed such as: amendment number, PIN, STIP/TIP ID,
project sponsor, location of project, route, termini, project description,
funding type (e.g., STBG, 5310), length, and description of amendment. Correspondence
will include ccs to the appropriate representatives within TDOT’s Long Range
Planning Division and/or Multimodal Resources Division.
Modification
Documentation:
Modification documentation will be
grouped in a single electronic file and use the naming convention,
"Modification [X] ([Project#])", where [X] identifies the
administrative modification's sequential identifier and [Project #] represents
the unique project number(s) of the program element(s) being modified.
Email correspondence will use the naming convention,
"Modification [X], [Organization]" in the subject line where [X]
identifies the administrative modification’s sequential identifier and [Organization]
represents name of the organization (MPO) submitting the administrative
modification. The body of the email or cover letter/project description within
the packet will include all applicable information as needed such as:
modification number, PIN, STIP/TIP ID, project sponsor, location of project,
route, termini, project description, funding type (e.g., STBG, 5310), length,
and description of amendment. Correspondence will include ccs to the
appropriate representatives within TDOT’s Long Range Planning Division and/or
Multimodal Resources Division.
Activities delivered from
TDOT’s statewide groupings are limited to work types that are:
1.
Located in non-metropolitan or rural areas – any located in a metropolitan
area must be programmed in the MPO’s TIP,
2.
Not considered to be of appropriate scale for individual
identification in a given program year,
3.
Environmentally-neutral as categorical exclusions under 23
CFR 771.117(c) and (d),
4.
Non-regionally significant, in non-attainment and
maintenance areas, and
5.
Exempt as defined in the EPA’s
transportation conformity regulations in 40 CFR Part 93, in non-attainment and maintenance areas.
Activities that do not
meet these requirements must be individually identified in the STIP or respective
MPO’s TIP. The following tables elaborate on the allowable work types for the
statewide groupings.
Grouping |
Function |
Allowable
Work Types |
Safety
Grouping TIP # 2090595 |
Any
strategy, activity or project on a public road that is consistent with the
data-driven State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and corrects or
improves a hazardous road location or feature or addresses a highway safety
problem, including workforce development, training and education activities. |
|
Safety
Grouping TIP #
2090595 |
Eligibility
of specific projects, strategies, and activities is generally based on: ·
Consistency with SHSP, ·
Crash experience, crash potential, or
other data-supported means, ·
Compliance with the requirements of
Title 23 of the U.S.C., and ·
State’s strategic or
performance-based safety goals to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on
all public roads. ·
Projects to upgrade railway-highway
grade crossings by eliminating hazards and installing protective devices. |
·
Intersection safety improvements ·
Pavement and shoulder widening
(including a passing lane to remedy an unsafe condition) ·
Installation of rumble strips or
another warning devices, if they do not adversely affect the safety or
mobility of bicyclists and pedestrians ·
Installation of skid-resistant
surface at intersections or locations with high crash frequencies ·
Improvements for pedestrian or
bicyclist safety ·
Construction and improvement of a
railway-highway grade crossing safety feature, including installation of
protective devices ·
The conduct of a model traffic
enforcement activity at a railway-highway crossing ·
Construction of a traffic calming
feature ·
Elimination of a roadside hazard ·
Installation, replacement, and other
improvements of highway signage and pavement markings, or a project to
maintain minimum levels of retro-reflectivity that addresses a highway safety
problem consistent with the SHSP ·
Installation of emergency vehicle
priority control systems at signalized intersections ·
Installation of traffic control or
other warning devices at locations with high crash potential ·
Transportation safety planning ·
Collection, analysis, and improvement
of safety data ·
Planning integrated interoperable
emergency communications equipment or operational or traffic enforcement
activities (including police assistance) related to work zone safety ·
Installation of guardrails, barriers
(including barriers between construction work zones and traffic lanes), and
crash attenuators. ·
The addition or retrofitting of
structures or other measures to eliminate or reduce crashes involving
vehicles and wildlife ·
Installation of yellow-green signs
and signals at pedestrian and bicycle crossings and in school zones. ·
Construction and operational
improvements on high risk rural roads. ·
Geometric improvements to a road for
safety purposes that improve safety. ·
Road safety audits. ·
Roadway safety infrastructure
improvements consistent with FHWA’s “Highway Design Handbook for Older
Drivers and Pedestrians” (FHWA-RD-01-103) ·
Truck parking facilities eligible for
funding under Section 1401 of MAP-21 ·
Systemic safety improvements ·
Installation of
vehicle-to-infrastructure communication equipment. ·
Pedestrian hybrid beacons. ·
Roadway improvements that provide
separation between pedestrians and motor vehicles, including medians and
pedestrian crossing islands. ·
Other physical infrastructure
projects not specifically enumerated in the list of eligible projects. ·
Workforce development, training, and
education activities. |
Grouping Category |
Function of Grouping
Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
Safety
Grouping (Section
130 or HSIP-R) TIP #
2090595 |
Activities
included as part of the Highway Railroad Grade Crossing program: |
·
Elimination of hazards of
railway-highway crossings, including the separation or protection of grades
at crossings. ·
Reconstruction of existing railroad
grade crossing structures. ·
Relocation of highways to eliminate
grade crossings. ·
Installation of protective devices. |
Grouping Category |
Function of Grouping Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
National
Highway System Infrastructure Grouping TIP # 2090560 |
Projects
for the preservation and improvement of the conditions and performance of the
National Highway System (NHS), including |
|
Grouping Category |
Function of Grouping
Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
National
Highway System Infrastructure Grouping TIP #
2090560 |
·
Rehabilitation, resurfacing,
restoration, preservation, and operational improvements, ·
Traffic operations, ·
Bridge and tunnel improvements, ·
Safety improvements, ·
Bicycle and pedestrian improvements,
and ·
Environmental mitigation. |
·
Minor rehabilitation, pavement
resurfacing, preventative maintenance, restoration, and pavement preservation
treatments to extend the service life of highway infrastructure, including
pavement markings and improvements to roadside hardware or sight distance. ·
Highway improvement work including
slide repair, rock fall mitigation, drainage repairs, or other preventative
work necessary to maintain or extend the service life of the existing
infrastructure in a good operational condition. ·
Minor operational and safety
improvements to intersections and interchanges such as adding turn lanes,
addressing existing geometric deficiencies, and extending on/off ramps. ·
Capital and operating costs for
intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and traffic monitoring, management,
and control facilities and programs: ·
Infrastructure-based intelligent
transportation systems (ITS) capital improvements. ·
Traffic Management Center (TMC)
operations and utilities. ·
Freeway service patrols. ·
Traveler information. ·
Bridge and tunnel construction (no
additional travel lanes), replacement, rehabilitation, preservation,
protection, inspection, evaluation, and inspector training and inspection and
evaluation of other infrastructure assets, such as signs, walls, and drainage
structures. ·
Development and implementation of a
State Asset Management Plan including data collection, maintenance and
integration, software costs, and equipment costs that support the development of
performance-based management systems for infrastructure. ·
Rail-highway grade crossing
improvements. ·
Highway safety improvements: ·
Installation of new or improvement of
existing guardrail. ·
Installation of traffic signs and
signals/lights. ·
Spot safety improvements. ·
Sidewalk improvements. ·
Pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities. ·
Traffic calming and traffic diversion
improvements. ·
Noise walls, ·
Wetland and/or stream mitigation, ·
Environmental restoration and
pollution abatement, ·
Control of noxious weeds and
establishment of native species. |
Grouping Category |
Function of Grouping
Activities |
Allowable Work Types |
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping TIP #
2090565 |
Projects
and programs for the preservation and improvement of the conditions and
performance of Federal-aid highways and public roads, including: |
Activities
previously authorized under the Surface Transportation Program (STP): |
|
Projects
and programs for the preservation and improvement of the conditions and
performance of Federal-aid highways and public roads, including: ·
Rehabilitation, resurfacing,
restoration, preservation, and operational improvements on Federal-aid
highways and designated routes of the Appalachian Development Highway System
(ADHS) and local access roads under 40 U.S.C. 14501, ·
Traffic operations on Federal-aid
highways, ·
Bridge and tunnel improvements on
public roads, ·
Safety improvements on public roads, ·
Environmental mitigation ·
Scenic and historic highway programs, ·
Landscaping and scenic
beautification, ·
Historic preservation, ·
Infrastructure projects for improving
non-driver access to public transportation and enhanced mobility, ·
Community improvement activities, |
Activities
previously authorized under the Surface Transportation Program (STP): ·
Minor rehabilitation, pavement
resurfacing, preventative maintenance, restoration, and pavement preservation
treatments to extend the service life of highway infrastructure, including
pavement markings and improvements to roadside hardware or sight distance ·
Highway improvement work including
slide repair, rock fall mitigation, drainage repairs, or other preventative
work necessary to maintain or extend the service life of the existing
infrastructure in a good operational condition ·
Minor operational and safety
improvements to intersections and interchanges such as adding turn lanes,
addressing existing geometric deficiencies, and extending on/off ramps. ·
Capital and operating costs for
intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and traffic monitoring, management,
and control facilities and programs: o Infrastructure-based
intelligent transportation systems (ITS) capital improvements. o Traffic
Management Center (TMC) operations and utilities. o Freeway
service patrols, o Traveler
information. ·
Bridge and tunnel construction (no
additional travel lanes), replacement, rehabilitation, preservation,
protection, inspection, evaluation, and inspector training and inspection and
evaluation of other infrastructure assets, such as signs, walls, and drainage
structures ·
Development and implementation of a
State Asset Management Plan including data collection, maintenance and
integration, software costs, and equipment costs that support the development
of performance-based management systems for infrastructure. ·
Rail - Highway grade crossing
improvements ·
Highway safety improvements: o Installation
of new or improvement of existing guardrail. o Installation
of traffic signs and signals/lights. o Spot safety
improvements. ·
Sidewalk improvements, ·
Pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities, ·
Traffic calming and traffic diversion
improvements, ·
Transportation Alternatives as
defined by 23 U.S.C. 213(B), 23 U.S.C.. 101(A)(29),
and Section 1122 of MAP-21. ·
Noise walls, ·
Wetland and/or stream mitigation, ·
Environmental restoration and
pollution abatement, ·
Control of noxious weeds and
establishment of native species |
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping For the
Johnson City MTPO TIP, these project awards will be in the TAP Grouping. TIP #
2020-09 |
·
Transportation Enhancement projects, |
Activities
previously authorized under the Transportation Enhancement Program: ·
Pedestrian and bicycle facilities,
safety, and educational activities. ·
Acquisition of scenic easements and
scenic or historic sites. ·
Scenic or historic highway programs, ·
Landscaping and other scenic
beautification activities, ·
Historic preservation, ·
Rehabilitation and operation of
historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities, ·
Preservation of abandoned railway
corridors, ·
Advertising, ·
Archaeological planning and research, ·
Environmental mitigation to address
water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife
mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity. ·
Establishment of transportation
museums, ·
Activities under the Tennessee Roadscapes grant program, including landscaping,
irrigation, benches, trash cans, paths, and signage. |
|
·
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
projects, |
Infrastructure
related activities: ·
Sidewalk improvements ·
Traffic calming and speed reduction
improvements ·
Pedestrian and bicycle crossing
improvements ·
On-street bicycle facilities ·
Off-street bicycle and pedestrian
facilities ·
Secure bicycle parking facilities ·
Traffic diversion improvements
approximately within 2 miles of a school location. |
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping TIP #
2090565 |
·
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
projects, |
Non-infrastructure
related activities: ·
Public awareness campaigns and
outreach to press and community leaders. ·
Traffic education and enforcement in
the vicinity of schools
|
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping For the Johnson City MTPO TIP, these project awards
will be in the TAP Grouping. TIP #
2020-09 |
·
Transportation Alternatives projects, ·
On- and off-road pedestrian and
bicycle facilities, |
Activities
previously authorized under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP): ·
Transportation Alternatives projects,
construction, planning, and design of on-road and off-road trail facilities for pedestrians,
bicyclists, and other non-motorized forms of transportation, including:
|
|
·
Transportation Alternatives projects, |
·
Construction, planning, and design of
infrastructure-related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for
non-drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with
disabilities to access daily needs ·
Conversion and use of abandoned
railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other
non-motorized transportation users ·
Construction of turnouts, overlooks,
and viewing areas |
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping For the Johnson City MTPO TIP, these project awards
will be in the TAP Grouping. TIP #
2020-09 |
·
Transportation Alternatives projects, |
Community
improvement activities, which include but are not limited to: ·
Inventory, control, or removal of
outdoor advertising. ·
Historic preservation and
rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities. ·
Vegetation management in
transportation rights-of-way to improve roadway safety, prevents invasive
species, and provides erosion control. ·
Archaeological activities relating to
impacts from implementation of a transportation project eligible under Title
23 of the U.S.C. |
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping For the Johnson City MTPO TIP, these project awards
will be in the TAP Grouping. TIP #
2020-09 |
·
Transportation Alternatives projects, |
Any
environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and
pollution abatement activities and mitigation to:
|
|
·
Projects for the creation,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of multi-use recreational trails. |
·
SRTS Program infrastructure-related
projects, non-infrastructure-related activities (such as pedestrian and
bicycle safety and educational activities advanced under the SRTS program),
and SRTS Coordinator positions. ·
Planning, designing, or constructing
boulevards and other roadways largely in the right-of-way of former
Interstate System routes or other divided highways |
Surface
Transportation Program Grouping TIP #
2090565 |
·
Recreational Trail Program projects, |
Recreational
Trails Program activities under 23 U.S.C. 206. ·
Maintenance and restoration of
existing recreational trails ·
Development and rehabilitation of
trailside and trailhead facilities and trail linkages for recreational trails ·
Purchase and lease of recreational
trail construction and maintenance equipment ·
Construction of new recreational
trails ·
Acquisition of easements and fee
simple title to property for recreational trails or recreational trail
corridors ·
Assessment of trail conditions for
accessibility and maintenance ·
Development and dissemination of
publications and operation of educational programs to promote safety and environmental
protection ·
Payment of costs to the State
incurred in administering the program |
Highway
Infrastructure Programs - Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental
Appropriations Act (HIP-CRRSAA)
Grouping |
·
Provide funding to address
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) impacts related to Highway Infrastructure
Programs: • Preventive maintenance on non-Federal-aid
highways; • Routine maintenance on any public road; • State DOT operations costs (not otherwise
Federal-aid reimbursed, such as indirect costs); • State DOT personnel costs (not otherwise
Federal-aid reimbursed, such as indirect costs); • Debt service payments for highway surface
transportation facilities (not otherwise Federal-aid reimbursed); • Transit operating costs for local public
agencies. |
· Preventive Maintenance as
discussed in 23 U.S.C. 116(e); · Routine maintenance. However, if
it is performed by contract, States and subrecipients must follow 2 CFR
200.317 and 1201.317. Routine maintenance may also be performed by State or
local forces through normal operations; · Operations costs may include,
but are not limited to, labor costs, administrative costs, costs of
utilities, and rent, for the highway surface transportation operations of
State DOTs or local governments; · Salaries of employees (including
those employees who have been placed on administrative leave) or contractors;
· The debt service costs allocable
to the highway surface transportation projects associated with the bond
issuance; · Funds for availability payments
related to highway surface transportation; · The State incurred a cost for
the identified “Special Authority” cost objective(s) and the State
demonstrates that a cost was incurred and is allocable to the identified
HIP-CRRSAA cost objective(s); · Projects with a public tolling
agency or ferry system, preferably through a subrecipient / subaward type
grant agreement between the entity and the State; · STBG Eligible activities in 23 USC 133(b); · Advance Construction conversion, obligation
and outlay for projects prior to incurrence of cost and which have been
included in a STIP. |
Highway Funding
Program Descriptions
Federal Highway Administration Funds are allocated to the state in numerous categories. The major funding categories are described below:
Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation (BRR) This program provides funding for bridge replacement, or to rehabilitate aging or substandard bridges based on bridge sufficiency ratings. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. The FAST Act continues that precedent with the elimination of a standalone funding category for BRR. All projects previously authorized under the BRR Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the BRR Program.
Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) The CMAQ program provides a flexible funding source to State and local governments for transportation projects and programs to help meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act. Funding is available to reduce congestion and improve air quality for areas that do not meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter (non-attainment areas) and for former non-attainment areas that are now in compliance (maintenance areas).
Funds may be used for transportation projects likely to contribute to the attainment or maintenance of a national ambient air quality standard, have a high level of effectiveness in reducing air pollution, and be included in the MPO's current transportation plan and TIP or the current STIP in areas without an MPO. Currently, all non-attainment and maintenance areas in the state are located within an MPO area, meaning that air quality conformity must be demonstrated in the MPO long-range transportation plans.
Some specific eligible activities are described below:
· Establishment or operation of a traffic monitoring, management, and control facility, including advanced truck stop electrification systems, if it contributes to attainment of an air quality standard.
· Projects that improve traffic flow, including projects to improve signalization, construct HOV lanes, improve intersections, add turning lanes, improve transportation systems management and operations that mitigate congestion and improve air quality, and implement ITS solutions and other CMAQ‐eligible projects, including projects to improve incident and emergency response or improve mobility, such as real‐time traffic, transit, and multimodal traveler information.
· Purchase of integrated, interoperable emergency communications equipment.
· Projects that shift traffic demand to non‐peak hours or other transportation modes, increase vehicle occupancy rates, or otherwise reduce demand.
· Purchase of diesel retrofits or conducts of related outreach activities.
· Facilities serving electric or natural gas‐fueled vehicles (except where this conflicts with prohibition on rest area commercialization) are explicitly eligible.
· Some expanded authority to use funds for transit operations.
· Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of CMAQ funds.
The time period for use of CMAQ funds is limited, specifically with the funds used for the operation of services and facilities. Previously, the operating assistance funds were allowable for use over a period of three years; however, those funds may now be used over the course of a five-year period in an effort to allow for an incremental reduction in assistance.
Demonstration Set Aside of the STP (DEMO) This program provides special funding for certain projects.
Enhancement Activity Set Aside of the STP (ENH) This program provides funding for pedestrian and bicycle facilities; pedestrian and bicycle safety and educational activities; acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; scenic or historic highway programs; landscaping and other scenic beautification activities; historic preservation; rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities; preservation of abandoned railway corridors; control and removal of outdoor advertising; archaeological planning and research; environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; establishment of transportation museums. Under the Tennessee Roadscapes grant program, types of work will include landscaping, irrigation, benches, trash cans, paths, and signage. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the ENH Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the ENH Program.
Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) This program provides funds for projects on Federal Lands Access Transportation Facilities that are located on, adjacent to, or that provide access to Federal lands.
A Federal Lands access transportation facility is defined as a public highway, road, bridge, trail, or transit system that is located on, adjacent to, or provides access to Federal lands for which title or maintenance responsibility is vested in a State, county, town, township, tribal, municipal, or local government. Funds are distributed by formula among States that have Federal Lands managed by the National Park Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division is responsible for administering the FLAP and serving the transportation engineering needs of these Federal Land Management agencies in Tennessee. Eligible Activities include but are not limited to: Transportation planning, research, engineering, preventive maintenance, rehabilitation, restoration, construction, and reconstruction of Federal Lands located on or adjacent to, or that: provide access to a Federal land (adjacent vehicular parking areas; acquisition of necessary scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; provisions for pedestrians and bicycles; environmental mitigation in or adjacent to Federal land to improve public safety and reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity; construction and reconstruction of roadside rest areas, including sanitary and water facilities); operation and maintenance of transit facilities.
Forest Highway/Public Lands (FH/PL) This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the Forest Highway Program and carry-over funds from SAFETEA-LU will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the Forest Highway Program.
High Priority Projects (HPP and HPP-L) This program provides designated funding to the state (HPP) and Local Agencies (HPP-L) for specific projects identified by Congress.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The FAST Act continues the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands. The HSIP requires a data-driven, strategic approach to improving highway safety on all public roads that focuses on performance. The FAST Act continues he overarching requirement that HSIP funds be used for safety projects that are consistent with the State’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and that correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature or address a highway safety problem. Under MAP-21, the HSIP statute listed a range of eligible HSIP projects. However, the list was non-exhaustive, and a State could use HSIP funds on any safety project (infrastructure-related or non-infrastructure) that met the overarching requirement. In contrast, the FAST Act limits HSIP eligibility to only those listed in 23 USC § 148—most of which are infrastructure-safety related.
High Risk Rural Road (HRRR) A HRRR is any rural major or minor collector or a rural local road with significant safety risks, as defined by a State in accordance with an updated SHSP. This funding program was eliminated as a separate program under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the HRRR Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the HRRR Program.
Interstate Maintenance (IM) This program provides funding to rehabilitate, restore, and resurface the Interstate System. Reconstruction is also eligible if it does not add capacity, and High-Occupancy-Vehicle (HOV) lanes can be added. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the IM Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the IM Program.
National Highway Freight Program (NHFP) The FAST Act established a new National Highway Freight Program to improve the efficient movement of freight on the National Highway Freight Network (NHFN) and support several goals. Generally, NHFP funds must contribute to the efficient movement of freight on the NHFN and be identified in a freight investment plan included in the State’s freight plan (required in FY 2018 and beyond). In addition, a State may use not more than 10% of its total NHFP apportionment each year for freight intermodal or freight rail projects. Eligible uses of program funds are as follows:
· Development phase activities, including planning, feasibility analysis, revenue forecasting, environmental review, preliminary engineering and design work, and other preconstruction activities.
· Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, acquisition of real property (including land relating to the project and improvements to land), construction contingencies, acquisition of equipment, and operational improvements directly relating to improving system performance.
· Intelligent transportation systems and other technology to improve the flow of freight, including intelligent freight transportation systems.
· Efforts to reduce the environmental impacts of freight movement.
· Environmental and community mitigation for freight movement.
· Railway‐highway grade separation.
· Geometric improvements to interchanges and ramps.
· Truck‐only lanes.
· Climbing and runaway truck lanes.
· Adding or widening of shoulders.
· Truck parking facilities eligible for funding under section 1401 (Jason’s Law) of MAP‐21.
· Real‐time traffic, truck parking, roadway condition, and multimodal transportation information systems.
· Electronic screening and credentialing systems for vehicles, including weigh‐in‐motion truck inspection technologies.
· Traffic signal optimization, including synchronized and adaptive signals.
· Work zone management and information systems.
· Highway ramp metering.
· Electronic cargo and border security technologies that improve truck freight movement.
· Intelligent transportation systems that would increase truck freight efficiencies inside the boundaries of intermodal facilities.
· Additional road capacity to address highway freight bottlenecks.
· Physical separation of passenger vehicles from commercial motor freight.
· Enhancement of the resiliency of critical highway infrastructure, including highway infrastructure that supports national energy security, to improve the flow of freight.
· A highway or bridge project, other than a project described above, to improve the flow of freight on the NHFN.
· Any other surface transportation project to improve the flow of freight into and out of an eligible intermodal freight facility.
· Diesel retrofit or alternative fuel projects under the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement program (CMAQ) for class 8 vehicles.
· Conducting analyses and data collection related to the NHFP, developing and updating freight performance targets to carry out section 167 of title 23, and reporting to the Administrator to comply with the freight performance target under section 150 of title 23.
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) The FAST Act continues the NHPP, which provides support for the condition and performance of the National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of performance targets established in a State's asset management plan for the NHS.
NHPP projects must be on an eligible facility and support progress toward achievement of national performance goals for improving infrastructure condition, safety, mobility, or freight movement on the NHS, and be consistent with Metropolitan and Statewide planning requirements. Eligible activities include:
· Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, preservation, or operational improvements of NHS segments.
· Construction, replacement (including replacement with fill material), rehabilitation, preservation, and protection (including scour countermeasures, seismic retrofits, impact protection measures, security countermeasures, and protection against extreme events) of NHS bridges and tunnels.
· Bridge and tunnel inspection and evaluation on the NHS and inspection and evaluation of other NHS highway infrastructure assets.
· Training of bridge and tunnel inspectors.
· Construction, rehabilitation, or replacement of existing ferry boats and facilities, including approaches that connect road segments of the NHS.
· Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, and preservation of, and operational improvements for, a Federal‐aid highway not on the NHS, and construction of a transit project eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, if the project is in the same corridor and in proximity to a fully access‐controlled NHS route, if the improvement is more cost‐effective (as determined by a benefit‐cost analysis) than an NHS improvement, and will reduce delays or produce travel time savings on the NHS route and improve regional traffic flow.
· Bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways.
· Highway safety improvements on the NHS.
· Capital and operating costs for traffic and traveler information, monitoring, management, and control facilities and programs.
· Development and implementation of a State Asset Management Plan for the NHS including data collection, maintenance and integration, software costs, and equipment costs.
· Infrastructure‐based ITS capital improvements.
· Environmental restoration and pollution abatement.
· Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species.
· Environmental mitigation related to NHPP projects.
· Construction of publicly owned intracity or intercity bus terminals servicing the NHS.
· Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of NHPP funds.
· Installation of vehicle‐to‐infrastructure communication equipment.
· Reconstruction, resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation, or preservation of a bridge on a non‐NHS Federal‐aid highway (if Interstate System and NHS Bridge Condition provision requirements are satisfied).
· A project to reduce the risk of failure of critical NHS infrastructure (defined to mean a facility, the incapacity or failure of which would have a debilitating impact in certain specified areas).
· At a State's request, the U.S. DOT may use the State's STBG funding to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an eligible NHPP project or group of projects.
National Highway System (NHS) This Program provides funding for major roads including the Interstate System, a large percentage of urban and rural principal arterials, the Strategic Defense Highway Network (STRAHNET), and strategic highway connectors. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the NHS Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the NHS Program.
National Scenic Byways Program (NSBP) This Program provides funding for roads having outstanding scenic, historic, cultural, natural, recreational, and archaeological qualities and provides for designation of these roads as National Scenic Byways, All-American Roads or America's Byways. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21. All projects previously authorized under the NSBP Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the NSBP Program.
Recreational Trails (RTP) This program provides funding for the creation, rehabilitation and maintenance of multi-use recreational trails. The FAST Act eliminated the RTP in lieu of replacing it and other programs with a set-aside of STBG funding for transportation alternatives. All projects previously authorized under the RTP and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the RTP.
Repurposed Funds (R) This acronym does not represent a specific funding program, but rather the re-designation of funds. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2016 allows States to repurpose certain funds originally earmarked for specific projects more than 10 years ago. The limitations in the provision are to ensure the projects are obligated promptly and used in the same geographic area as the original earmark to provide funding for other needed projects eligible under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program. In this STIP, repurposed earmark funds are designated with ‘R-‘preceding the funding code.
Safe Routes to School (SRTS) This program provides funding for empowering communities to make walking and bicycling to school a safe and routine activity. This funding program was eliminated under MAP-21, with eligibilities initially carried forward under the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). Under the FAST Act, SRTS activities are carried forward under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) . All projects previously authorized under the SRTS Program and carry-over funds will still be administered under previous rules and regulations of the SRTS Program.
Section 154 This Program provides funding to help save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce economic costs due to road traffic crashes, through education, research, safety standards, and enforcement activity.
State (STA) This program provides 100% state funding by the state for various projects on the State Highway System.
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG) The FAST Act converted the long-standing Surface Transportation Program into the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). The new STBG Program provides flexible funding that may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals. Eligible activities include, but are not limited to:
· Construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, resurfacing, restoration, preservation, or operational improvements for highways, including designated routes of the Appalachian Development Highway System (ADHS) and local access roads under 40 USC 14501.
· Replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, and anti‐icing/deicing for bridges and tunnels on any public road, including construction or reconstruction necessary to accommodate other modes.
· Construction of new bridges and tunnels on a Federal‐aid highway.
· Inspection and evaluation of bridges, tunnels and other highway assets as well as training for bridge and tunnel inspectors.
· Capital costs for transit projects eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, including vehicles and facilities used to provide intercity passenger bus service.
· Carpool projects, fringe and corridor parking facilities and programs, including electric and natural gas vehicle charging infrastructure, bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways, and ADA sidewalk modification.
· Highway and transit safety infrastructure improvements and programs, installation of safety barriers and nets on bridges, hazard eliminations, mitigation of hazards caused by wildlife, railway‐highway grade crossings.
· Highway and transit research, development, technology transfer.
· Capital and operating costs for traffic monitoring, management and control facilities and programs, including advanced truck stop electrification.
· Surface transportation planning.
· Transportation alternatives ‐ newly defined with set‐aside, includes most transportation enhancement eligibilities.
· Transportation control measures.
· Development and establishment of management systems.
· Environmental mitigation efforts (as under National Highway Performance Program).
· Intersections with high accident rates or levels of congestion.
· Infrastructure‐based ITS capital improvements.
· Environmental restoration and pollution abatement.
· Control of noxious weeds and establishment of native species.
· Congestion pricing projects and strategies, including electric toll collection and travel demandmanagement strategies and programs.
· Recreational trails projects.
· Construction of ferry boats and terminals.
· Border infrastructure projects.
· Truck parking facilities.
· Development and implementation of State asset management plan for the NHS, and similar activities related to the development and implementation of a performance based management program for other public roads.
· Surface transportation infrastructure modifications within port terminal boundaries, only if necessary to facilitate direct intermodal interchange, transfer, and access into and out of the port.
· Construction and operational improvements for a minor collector in the same corridor and in proximity to an NHS route if the improvement is more cost‐ effective (as determined by a benefit‐cost analysis) than an NHS improvement and will enhance NHS level of service and regional traffic flow.
· Workforce development, training, and education activities are also an eligible use of STBG funds.
· Create and operate a State office to help design, implement, and oversee public‐private partnerships (P3) eligible to receive Federal highway or transit funding, and to pay a stipend to unsuccessful P3 bidders in certain circumstances.
· At a State’s request, the U.S. DOT may use the State’s STBG funding to pay the subsidy and administrative costs for TIFIA credit assistance for an eligible STBG project or group of projects.
Similar to the past STP funding, STBG projects may not be on local or rural minor collectors. However, there are a number of exceptions to this requirement. A State may use up to 15% of its rural sub allocation on minor collectors. Other exceptions include: bridge and tunnel projects; safety projects; fringe and corridor parking facilities/programs; recreational trails, pedestrian and bicycle projects, and safe routes to school projects; boulevard/roadway projects largely in the right-of-way of divided highways; inspection/evaluation of bridges, tunnels, and other highway assets; port terminal modifications; and projects within the pre-FAST Act title 23 definition of “transportation alternatives”.
The FAST Act continues the MAP-21 set-aside of a share of each State’s STBG apportionment for use on bridges not on Federal-aid highways (“off-system bridges”). The amount is to be not less than 15% of the State’s FY 2009 Highway Bridge Program apportionment. The Secretary, after consultation with State and local officials, may reduce a State’s set-aside requirement if the State has insufficient off-system bridge needs. For wholly State/locally funded projects to replace or rehabilitate deficient off-system bridges, any amounts spent that are in excess of 20% of project costs may be credited to the non-Federal share of eligible bridge projects in the State.
Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) The FAST Act eliminated the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) and replaced it with a set-aside of Surface Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for transportation alternatives. These set-aside funds include all projects and activities that were previously eligible under TAP, encompassing a variety of smaller-scale transportation projects such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities, recreational trails, safe routes to school projects, community improvements such as historic preservation and vegetation management, and environmental mitigation related to storm water and habitat connectivity.
Generally, transportation alternatives eligibilities are the same as those under the prior TAP and consist of:
· Transportation Alternatives as defined in 23 USC 101(a)(29) (MAP‐21 1103):
o Construction, planning, and design of on‐road and off‐road trail facilities for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non‐motorized forms of transportation, including sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, pedestrian and bicycle signals, traffic calming techniques, lighting and other safety‐ related infrastructure, and transportation projects to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
o Construction, planning, and design of infrastructure‐related projects and systems that will provide safe routes for non‐drivers, including children, older adults, and individuals with disabilities to access daily needs.
o Conversion and use of abandoned railroad corridors for trails for pedestrians, bicyclists, or other non‐motorized transportation users.
o Construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas.
o Community improvement activities, including;
Inventory, control, or removal of outdoor advertising;
Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities;
Vegetation management practices in transportation rights‐of‐way to improve roadway safety, prevent against invasive species, and provide erosion control; and
Archaeological activities relating to impacts from implementation of transportation project eligible under title 23.
o Any environmental mitigation activity, including pollution prevention and pollution abatement activities and mitigation to;
Address storm water management, control, and water pollution prevention or abatement related to highway construction or due to highway runoff, including activities described in sections 133(b)(11), 328(a), and 329 of title 23; or
Reduce vehicle‐caused wildlife mortality or to restore and maintain connectivity among terrestrial or aquatic habitats.
· The Recreational Trails Program under Section 206 of Title 23.
· The Safe Routes to School Program under section 1404 of the SAFETEA‐LU.
o Infrastructure‐related projects ‐planning, design, and construction of infrastructure‐related projects on any public road or any bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail in the vicinity of schools that will substantially improve the ability of students to walk and bicycle to school, including sidewalk improvements, traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements, on‐street bicycle facilities, off‐street bicycle and pedestrian facilities, secure bicycle parking facilities, and traffic diversion improvements in the vicinity of schools.
o Non‐infrastructure‐related activities to encourage walking and bicycling to school, including public awareness campaigns and outreach to press and community leaders, traffic education and enforcement in the vicinity of schools, student sessions on bicycle and pedestrian safety, health, and environment, and funding for training, volunteers, and managers of safe routes to school programs.
o Safe Routes to School coordinator.
· Planning, designing, or constructing boulevards and other roadways largely in the right‐of‐way of former Interstate System routes or other divided highways.
· Ineligible Activities: Section 1103 of MAP‐21 eliminated the definition of transportation enhancement activities in section 104 of title 23 and inserted in its place a definition of transportation alternatives, which does not include eligibility for certain activities that were previously eligible as transportation enhancements:
· Safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicycles.
· Exception: Activities targeting children in Kindergarten through 8th grade are eligible under SRTS (an eligible activity under TAP funding).
Note: Some of these activities may be eligible under HSIP. Non‐construction projects for bicycle safety remain broadly eligible for STBG funds.
· Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites.
· Scenic or historic highway programs (including visitor and welcome centers).
Note: A few specific activities under this category (construction of turnouts, overlooks, and viewing areas) remain eligible under Section 101(a)(29)(D) of title 23.
· Historic preservation as an independent activity unrelated to historic transportation facilities. Note: Historic preservation and rehabilitation of historic transportation facilities are permitted as one type of community improvement activity; see Section 101(a)(29)(E).
· Operation of historic transportation facilities.
· Archaeological planning and research undertaken for proactive planning. This category now must be used only as mitigation for highway projects.
· Transportation museums.
The FAST Act allows an urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 to use up to 50% of its sub-allocated TA funds for any STBG-eligible purpose (but still subject to the TA-wide requirement for competitive selection of projects). Additionally, it eliminated TAP’s “Flexibility of Excess Reserved Funding” provision, which allowed the use of excess TAP funds for any TAP-eligible activity or for projects eligible under the CMAQ Program.
[1] The baseline is based on preliminary figures from early 2019. FHWA will determine the final figures in early 2020.
[2] The five-year rolling average is calculated by adding the number of fatalities for the consecutive five-year period, dividing by five, and rounding to the tenth decimal place.
[3] VMT – Vehicle Miles Traveled